1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Matt 18 and Matt 6 Disprove OSAS

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by BobRyan, Dec 6, 2013.

Top Posters
Page 6 of 14
  1. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    [FONT=&quot]32 ""Then summoning him, his lord said to him, "You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]33 " Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?'[/FONT]

    The circular argument that says that the king was lying - and the man was never forgiven in the first place and so had every reason not to forgive others JUST as he had NOT been forgiven himself - makes nonsense of the entire warning of Christ "SO shall my Father do to each one if you IF you do not...".

    Even DHK gets this Bible detail easily...

    No wonder people are so anxious to avoid the 3 easy Bible questions based on Matt 18 and Matt 6.

    Were we all simply "not supposed to notice"???

    in Christ,

    Bob
     
    #101 BobRyan, Dec 9, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 9, 2013
  2. prophet

    prophet Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    2
    Turning someone over to tormentors is not = sending them to Hell.
    This is established, you have agreed with me, so this eliminates Matthew 18 from any discussion of 'OSAS'.
     
    #102 prophet, Dec 9, 2013
  3. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    A hypothetical is not a lie -

    Were we all simply "not supposed to notice" your deflection of the facts???
     
    #103 steaver, Dec 9, 2013
  4. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    The king did not say "hypothetically I forgave you all that debt" as we all know.

    [FONT=&quot]32 ""Then summoning him, his lord said to him, "You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]33 " Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?'[/FONT]


    Even DHK gets this Bible detail easily...

     
    #104 BobRyan, Dec 9, 2013
  5. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    It is hell -- when the analogy is between a King and His servants -- vs God and His people.

    An even though there were no flames on the cross or in the Garden of Gethsemane -- And yet on the cross Christ paid for the full debt of sin "For OUR sins and not for OUR SINS only but for the SINS of the WHOLE WORLD" 1John 2:2.

    So the fact that God uses flames "Fire and brimstone" in fact to accomplish that torment and suffering in the "second death" the "Lake of Fire" does not take away from the fact that the full debt was paid by Christ and that as GOD says in Matt 18 the full debt is paid by the wicked for their own debt of sin.

    What part of these "Bible details" is supposed to excuse those who wish to turn a blind eye to the teaching of Christ in Matt 18 and in Matt 6 that does not compliment OSAS??

    What part of these "Bible details" leads you to ignore the 3 easy Bible questions based on Matt 18 and Matt 6?
     
    #105 BobRyan, Dec 9, 2013
  6. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I am reminding those who keep ignoring these 3 easy questions (taken from the texts in the opening Post )-- of just what it is they are ignoring.
    ================================

    I am asking you to respond to the details IN the text.

    1. First this one -- where we see an ALREADY FULLY Forgiven servant expected to forgive AS HE WAS TRULY forgiven.

    [FONT=&quot]32 ""Then summoning him, his lord said to him, "You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]33 " Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?'[/FONT]

    2. Then THIS ONE

    Where we see forgiveness revoked - full debt returned.

    [FONT=&quot]34 ""And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until he should repay all that was owed him.


    3. Then THiS ONE
    [/FONT]
    Where Christ applies the lesson to His listeners - which is obviously OUTSIDE of the parable.

    [FONT=&quot]35 "" My heavenly Father will also do the same to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart.'' [/FONT]

    Which is what we also see with Matt 6. (Which is obviously OUTSIDE of a parable)
    15 But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions.

    So yes that would be "Sola scriptura" testing of your man-made tradition if you can actually address "the Bible details".

    Obviously - ducking the these Bible details does not count as addressing them.

    ======================

    Those who think they are responding to these three specific and easy points -- please post your response that pays attention to the Bible details listed -- or else post the link to such a post so we can see if it is fact or myth.

    But be careful because as we all know and agree -- "Bible details matter".
     
    #106 BobRyan, Dec 9, 2013
  7. prophet

    prophet Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    2
    Non answer.
     
    #107 prophet, Dec 9, 2013
  8. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I think this is the part where you say - "This is you quoting you". Yes, Bob likes to quote himself also.

    Maybe he thought "nobody notices"
     
    #108 steaver, Dec 9, 2013
  9. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    It has all been answered and your interpretation refuted.

    Maybe folks are - "not suppose to notice".

    Now maybe there is someone out there you could present that preaches this as you do - anybody?? Or is it an exclusive BobRyan tradition??

     
    #109 steaver, Dec 9, 2013
  10. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Are you trying to say in some clever way that Jesus Christ went to hell, the lake of fire. If so then say so and once again demonstrate your ignorance of Scripture.

    The prophet is correct as I have stated the same elsewhere.
     
    #110 OldRegular, Dec 9, 2013
  11. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I have an idea! Let's put a call out to all the viewers of this thread and ask them if they have noticed if all of your questions have been thoroughly addressed or not!

    Ok, Is there anybody out there who believes Bob's questions to the details of the text have not been answered?
     
    #111 steaver, Dec 9, 2013
  12. prophet

    prophet Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    2
    1 vote for they've been answered and ignored.
     
    #112 prophet, Dec 9, 2013
  13. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    In my post I suggest that those who wish to fictionalize events that did not take place - provide the link to a post where they deal with 'the details" in the 3 questions.

    Response??? ...crickets...crickets...

    ======================

    I am reminding those who keep ignoring these 3 easy questions (taken from the texts in the opening Post )-- of just what it is they are ignoring.
    ================================

    I am asking you to respond to the details IN the text.

    1. First this one -- where we see an ALREADY FULLY Forgiven servant expected to forgive AS HE WAS TRULY forgiven.

    [FONT=&quot]32 ""Then summoning him, his lord said to him, "You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]33 " Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?'[/FONT]

    2. Then THIS ONE

    Where we see forgiveness revoked - full debt returned.

    [FONT=&quot]34 ""And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until he should repay all that was owed him.


    3. Then THiS ONE
    [/FONT]
    Where Christ applies the lesson to His listeners - which is obviously OUTSIDE of the parable.

    [FONT=&quot]35 "" My heavenly Father will also do the same to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart.'' [/FONT]

    Which is what we also see with Matt 6. (Which is obviously OUTSIDE of a parable)
    15 But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions.

    So yes that would be "Sola scriptura" testing of your man-made tradition if you can actually address "the Bible details".

    Obviously - ducking the these Bible details does not count as addressing them.

    ======================

    Those who think they are responding to these three specific and easy points -- please post your response that pays attention to the Bible details listed -- or else post the link to such a post so we can see if it is fact or myth.

    But be careful because as we all know and agree -- "Bible details matter".
     
    #113 BobRyan, Dec 9, 2013
  14. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Me Too!:laugh:
     
    #114 OldRegular, Dec 9, 2013
  15. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    They have 12 pages here to look through and can go here for the same subject http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=90233

    I'm sure they won't find an adequate response to your objections lacking. It is your "game" to play "let's pretend nobody answered" and just keep clipping and pasting the same questions as if "nobody is noticing".

    I'm not sure that method of doctrinal debate is working as well as you may have first imagined it would for you.

    Reminds me of a school boy putting his hands over his ears and shouting "I can't hear you!"
     
    #115 steaver, Dec 10, 2013
  16. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Some offer only the Bible-vacuous post after Bible-vacuous post.

    Some flee the 3 easy Bible questions specific to the "Bible details in the chapter".

    Those who think they are responding to these three specific and easy points -- please post your response that pays attention to the Bible details listed -- or else post the link to such a post so we can see if it is fact or myth.

    But be careful because as we all know and agree -- "Bible details matter".

    This is usually where "the gamers" step in.

    in Christ,

    Bob
     
    #116 BobRyan, Dec 10, 2013
  17. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    That is a snotty remark, Ryan, and a sorry attitude about the Word of God. Would you be so disrespectful of remarks by the founder of SDA, Ellen White? I think not. When you sign out, In Christ, does that really mean "in Ellen White"?

    Ryan

    Scripture does not conflict with Scripture. Sufficient Scripture has been presented to show that your interpretation of the passages you repeatedly post from Matthew is not correct. If that doesn't make you happy you will just have to live with it.
     
    #117 OldRegular, Dec 10, 2013
  18. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Vitriol noted:

    However the point remains from my former post --

    Those who think they are responding to these three specific and easy points -- please post your response that pays attention to the Bible details listed -- or else post the link to such a post so we can see if it is fact or myth.

    But be careful because as we all know and agree -- "Bible details matter".

    This is usually where "the gamers" step in.
     
    #118 BobRyan, Dec 10, 2013
  19. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    I thought you believed that Bible posts were vacuous!
     
    #119 OldRegular, Dec 10, 2013
  20. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Nope "Bible vacuous" means no Bible in those posts - just rant... vitriol...acrimony...diatribe.... ad hominem.

    You know -- 'the usual and customary' at least for a few.
     
    #120 BobRyan, Dec 10, 2013
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 6 of 14
Loading...