Obama 2016

We saw this documentary at one of the best theaters in Indianapolis in the summer before the election.

It is the number one documentary of all time and it earned a profit of thirty million dollars.

However, in a blatant political move, Obama had the author and producer, Dartmouth educated Dinesh D'Souza arrested last week on a felony charge of campaign law violations in New York. He is now freed on a half-million dollar bond.

A similar violation under Bush was considered a misdemeanor, so we can see Obama's hate at work here.

D'Souza is currently working on another film to be released the Fourth of July.

Obama is turning this country into Nazi Germany, as you can see.

Here is a link to the D'Souza arrest for political reasons:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ted-cruz-defends-dinesh-souza-article-1.1593758

 

Thanks Judith. I just now finished that documentary --quite revealing. But I've been putting two and two together on him for a long time.

 

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1845589#post1845589

He's a puppet, a Marxist puppet, it was a Marxist entity that groomed him and created him and put him where he is and accompanied him to Washington and still yet surrounds him now.

He literally is 'the tip of the iceberg'.

 

You sound a bit Ponchoesque!

 

You went over my head there Rippon.

Note the link I provided, my sources are from the 'horse's mouth'.

 

I just meant that you sounded like Poncho in your post.

 

My point is Islam is NOT the real issue with this guy, it's Marxism. The Muslim connection is a diversion from his real origins. If I sound like Poncho by asserting this, then so be it.

I happen to like ol' Poncho.

 

We now know that Obama has no defense against the truth of this documentary because of his using the New York courts to bring felony charges against Dinesh D'Souza and the levying of a half-million dollars bond for what would normally be a misdemeanor.


Dinesh D'Souza website: http://www.dineshdsouza.com/

 

The announcement from the U.S. Attorney's office in New York's South District claimed the "violation" was discovered in a "routine review" of campaign contribution records. Really?

A routine review? A "review" of a Senate race between Kirsten Gillibrand and Wendy Long in New York? An election that Long lost to Gillibrand by forty-five points (72% to 27%)??? First, why would the U.S. Attorney bother "reviewing" such a race in the first place? Then ask why would D’Souza try to push illegal contributions in the low five figures and risk criminal prosecution in a race where tens of millions of dollars were spent (but only $1 million by the challenger), where that challenger was utterly doomed? For that matter, why use straw men when D’Souza could have just bundled for Long instead, or set up a PAC?

2016: Obama's America got way too close to the truth of the Ignoble Traitor's political and socioeconomic convictions, in my opinion, but to indict him last year, even after the election, would have looked to suspicious. D'Souza's attorney gave what amounts to an admission of guilt after the indictment, which in itself is suspicious, but then, Long was a "long" shot (no pun intended) and any effort to buy her election surely would have been of a much greater scope and intricacy than a contribution $15,000 over the limit. So this appears to be selective prosecution, and the $500,000 bond is punitive in light of the fact the illegality of the contribution is five percent of the bond total. Something is rotten in the Bronx, and it isn't the Yankees this time.

 

Never liked the guy from day one of his appearance on the presidential political scene.
Don't like him now.
To me he is an exact representation of what they say in New York about the guy who will most likely "off" you: with a pat on the back and a smile on his face.
Don't know nothin' about him as a politician except that he wasn't there, and then he was there.
From which I got this gut instinct that he ain' gon' be up to no good.