1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What is the purpose of Calvinism?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by doulous, Nov 8, 2008.

  1. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You may want to read what the actual signers of the 1689 London Baptist Confession meant when they wrote ""bishops or elders, and deacons". The recent Baptist fad of reinterpreting it to mean something akin to the Presbyterians' plurality of elders was definitely not what was meant by them.

    Here is how one explained the term elder:

    Benjamin Keach, 1697:
    “Query, Are there no ruling Elders besides the Pastor?
    Answ. There might be such in the Primitive Apostolical Church, but we see no ground to believe it an abiding Office to continue in the Church, but was only temporary.
    1. Because we have none of the Qualifications of such Elders mention’d, or how to be chosen.
    2. Because we read not particularly what their Work and Business is, or how distinct from preaching Elders; tho we see not but the Church may (if she sees meet) choose some able and discreet Brethren to be Helps in Government. We have the Qualifications of Bishops and Deacons directly laid down, and how to be chosen, and their Work declared, but of no other Office or Officers in the Church, but these only.”

    Benjamin Keach, 1701:
    “others think there were men ordained Elders, that were not gifted to preach, but to be helpful in Discipline, or in the Governement of the Church : but we reading neither of their Qualifications, or how to be chosen (nor of their peculiar Work, distinct from Pastors, nor any such elders chosen in any particular. church in the Apostles days) can see no ground for any such an Office, or Officers in the Church”
     
    #61 Jerome, Nov 12, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 12, 2008
  2. doulous

    doulous New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've heard this argument. Thank you.
     
  3. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    Acts 20:28. Paul is meeting with the elders from the congregation at Ephesus. He describes them as shepherds (pastors) and overseers (bishops). It seems that elders were the most spiritual and wisest men in the congregation. The Holy Spirit gave them the spiritual gifts which led to their roles as pastors and bishops.
     
  4. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    First, there are very few three pointers, and there are no six pointers. Second, they are all correct on the main thing which is unconditional election. That is the hinge. Beyond that, as in every group, there are intramural debates about certain issues.

    I don't think any of them are heresy, using the historic definition of heresy.

    No.


    Since I am not God, and not omniscient, I won't pretend to know. Apparently, you don't share that view with me and that is unfortunate. I would caution you to stop short of making proclamations about things that you know nothing about.

    We welcome you then. We as Calvinists believe the same thing.

    We Calvinists agree for the most part.

    Since you asked, I would call you a poor thinker, who has not sufficiently grappled with biblical revelation on the topic. You have bought into simplistic explanations of men.

    So? I appreciate these men's passion for the gospel, and I reject their explanations of it, at least the ones I have seen.
     
  5. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    John Piper adds a predestination to hell sixth point.
     
  6. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    That point (for those who believe it) has traditionally been included in the five points. It has never been considered a sixth point. I think Piper actually calls himself a seven point Calvinist.

    Those interested in Piper's view can see it here: http://www.desiringgod.org/Resource...en_he_says_that_he_is_a_sevenpoint_Calvinist/

    Note that it says he is not adding to the historical points.
     
    #66 Pastor Larry, Nov 13, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 13, 2008
  7. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    We tend to forget that the 5 points of calvinism was in direct refutation of the 5 points of arminianism, and not vice versa.

    Calvinism itself begins with the absolute sovereignty of God, and all the other teaching follows.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  8. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Wrong. As a non calvinist, my theology also begins with the absolute sovereignty of God. God is in control (sovereign) not controlling (calvinism).
     
  9. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Do you comprende enfrancais better than English? I can speak in French if you will understand what I say better.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  10. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    How does this make Jim's statement wrong? He didn't say anything about your belief. He said something only about Calvinism.

    What is the difference you see here?
     
  11. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I took "all other teaching follows" as referring to calvinism being the only true soteriology. If that was not Jim's intent, my apologies to Jim.
    God is in control of every action, including sin, but He is not controlling every action, including sin. He requires faith and repentance, He doesn't have faith and repentance for us.
     
  12. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am still not sure exactly what distinction you are making here.

    This is what Calvinism teaches, so that is certainly not an issue.
     
  13. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    The difference between being in contol and controlling.
    I was simply answering the question you asked.
     
  14. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Repeating your terms doesn't help me understand the distinction you are making. You say he is in control, but is not controlling. What do you mean by that exactly?
     
  15. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not in the mood for the circular game today, Larry.
     
  16. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's nothing circular about it. You haven't answered the question.

    I was simply asking you to explain what you see as the difference between God being "in control" but not being "controlling." So far (that I have seen) you haven't given an answer. I have no idea what that means.

    I don't see what this distinction is and I am simply asking you to explain what you mean. I am not sure I disagree with you. I might if I understood what you mean, or I might not.

    How is he in control of every action but not controlling every action.
     
  17. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    In many many cases the verbs associated with the action of God is passive. Not every action of God is active.
     
  18. golfjack

    golfjack New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    reply

    GolfJack,

    According to your profile you are not a Baptist. This is a Baptist Only section of the BB. Please restrict your posts to the sections of the BB that are open to all Christian Denominations.
     
    #78 golfjack, Nov 14, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 14, 2008
  19. MB

    MB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    262
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What isn't accrate is men being regenerated before faith.

    Since Grace is what we need to be regenerated or saved and Grace comes through faith a man must be convinced and convicted before Salvation. There isn't even one scripture that even hints at prefaith regeneration.
    MB
     
  20. doulous

    doulous New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, you're wrong.

    The gospel cannot be understood by the sinner because it is spiritually appraised. The words may be processed, but not the spiritual truth. It is the Spirit that gives understanding, and this is done during the ordo salutis.

    Nicodemus was able to understand the words of Jesus, but not the things of the Spirit. Why? Go back to 1 Cor. 2:14. Nicodemus was not regenerate. His heart was still cold to the things of God.

    Where do you see a work of man in this passage? The subject is God and the object is "us." God made us alive together with Christ, even while we were still dead in our trespasses and sins. Spiritually dead people can't believe because they are incapable of believing. Why? Again, back to 1 Cor. 2:14.

    Just because you say, "There isn't even one scripture that even hints at prefaith regeneration" doesn't make it so.
     
    #80 doulous, Nov 14, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 14, 2008
Loading...