1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Water and Blood

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by mman, May 15, 2005.

  1. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
     
  2. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    There you go again, bottling up theological concepts into packages of works: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, etc. How many works do you have to do to enter into heaven? The Bible mentions faith, and faith alone. However faith is not a work.

    First, confession and baptism have nothing to do with one another. Why you substitute one for another is beyond me. You accuse me of faulty logic, when you have only proved yourself to have the faulty logic. Baptism is symbolic. It is not necessarily a confession of anything. Yes, salvation is all of God, all of grace. There is nothing you can do but accept that gift by faith, and faith alone.

    No, one cannot say the same about confession and repentance, etc. Salvation is by grace through faith (Eph.2:8,9) What is wrong? Don't you believe the Bible? It is plain that baptism is a work, but salvation is "not of works" as verse 9 plainly says. Your arguement with God, not with me.


    Are you hung up on accusing people of "faulty logic" when you cannot harmonize the Scripture for yourself? The Bible says that salvation is by faith. Why do you deny this? Why do you reject the teaching of Eph.2:8,9? Repentance and calling on the name of the Lord, are all included in true Biblical faith. This is what you fail to understand. When Paul had called on the name of the Lord, at the same time he had repented and put his faith in Christ. What was the result of his salvation experience that took place on the road to Damascus. He obeyed the Lord, as a believer in Christ, and was later baptized, and then testified of Christ. He was obedient to Christ. Obedience didn't earn him salvation. Putting his faith in Christ gave him salvation. It was a gift of God.
    "faulty logic" You really need a bigger vocabulary!
    "ave excluded confession, repentance, and calling on the name of the Lord."
    This redundancy is getting boring. I have already explained this, I don't know how many times now.

    And baptism just gets you wet! That is why neither one gets you to heaven. By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of yourselves. It is faith in the saving grace of the Lord Jesus Christ. You still don't believe Eph.2:8,9 do you? When will you start believing the Bible?
    What you think happened and what actually happened, according to the Bible, are two completely different things. The water that you were baptized in got you wet. It did no more good for you than the waters of the Ganges River did for the Hindus in India. Your faith is misplaced and I feel sorry for you, that you have such a misplaced misguided pagan belief. Others have misled you into a non-Biblical doctrine--the doctrine of a cult. The only thing that washes away sin is the blood of Christ.

    1 John 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

    Hebrews 9:22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

    1 Peter 3:18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

    1 Peter 1:18-19 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
    19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
    DHK
     
  3. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since God’s grace has appeared to all men and it is all from God and nothing from man, then all men would be saved, if this were really true. I presume from you comments that neither you nor I believe that, so something IS required from man, else all men would be saved.

    The question is, what is required from man.

    I am only repeating what God said through his word. Why do you not believe Jesus when he said, “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, and he that believeth not, shall be condemned.”? Again, you could substitute, confession, repentance, or calling on the name of the Lord where you wrote baptism.


     
  4. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    In Acts 11 it is on the UNBAPTIZED person that the Holy Spirit falls AND GIFTS are given.

    In 1John 1:9 it is when we CONFESS that we are forgiven.

    In Romans 10 it is when we BELIEVE with the heart and CONFESS with the mouth that we are "saved".

    The point is clear in scripture - Baptism is the act of the saved, repentant, born-again believer in following Christ - in obedience.

    It is an outward sign of an already existing - inward change.

    It is evidence that the NEW CREATION (2Cor 5) already exists - and that having already been "justified" you HAVE "peace with God" Romans 5 and in that fellowship you are choosing to follow in obedience and undergo Baptism.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  5. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    In Acts 11 it is on the UNBAPTIZED person that the Holy Spirit falls AND GIFTS are given.

    In 1John 1:9 it is when we CONFESS that we are forgiven.

    In Romans 10 it is when we BELIEVE with the heart and CONFESS with the mouth that we are "saved".

    The point is clear in scripture - Baptism is the act of the saved, repentant, born-again believer in following Christ - in obedience.

    It is an outward sign of an already existing - inward change.

    It is evidence that the NEW CREATION (2Cor 5) already exists - and that having already been "justified" you HAVE "peace with God" Romans 5 and in that fellowship you are choosing to follow in obedience and undergo Baptism.

    In Christ,

    Bob
    </font>[/QUOTE]Bob - I am still curious at what point were the people in Acts 19 saved? What was their purpose of being re-baptized?

    Also, at what point did the people on the day of Pentecost (as only recorded in Acts 2)receive remission of sins?

    Finally, when did Saul of Tarsus have his sins washed away (Acts 9, Act 22, Act 26)?

    I John 1:9 is for those who are already in the light, not those in darkness trying to get into the light.

    In Romans 10 it is when we BELIEVE with the heart and CONFESS with the mouth that we are "saved". - This is not all that God has said on this subject. If it were, I would agree 100 percent with you. For example, Jesus said, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved." Was Jesus giving conflicting instructions? No. Was Jesus kidding? No. Was Jesus mistaken? No. The truth never contradicts itself. These passages are in complete harmony with each other.

    I appreciate your kind attitude and sincerity, attributes that we all need.

    As I asked DHK, would you mind using the passages dealing with baptism to explain what happens in baptism. You are not going to discover the purpose of baptism by going to passages where it's not mentioned. You'll have to go to what the Bible says about baptism to determine the Bible doctrine of baptism. I have done this and nowhere is it described as an outward sign of an already existing inward change.

    When I list them, there is no explaination necessary.

    To list a few:

    Mark 16:16 -He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. (No commentary necessary)

    Acts 2:38 - Then Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
    (No commentary necessary).

    Rom 6:3-4 Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? 4Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. (No commentary necessary)

    Gal 3:26For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. (No commentary necessary)

    Acts 22:16And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.' (No commentary necessary)

    Col 2:12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead. (No commentary necessary)

    I Pet 3:21 There is also an antitype which now saves us--baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, (no commentary necessary)

    Acts 16:30 And he brought them out and said, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" 31 So they said, " Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved , you and your household." 32Then they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all who were in his house. 33And he took them the same hour of the night and washed their stripes. And immediately he and all his family were baptized. 34Now when he had brought them into his house, he set food before them; and he rejoiced, having believed in God with all his household. (No commentary necessary)

    Any other verse that deals with salvation does not negate these verses, it only compliments them. No doubt we are children of God through faith. That is exactly what the bible teaches in Gal 3:26-27, listed above.
     
  6. Eric B

    Eric B Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2001
    Messages:
    4,838
    Likes Received:
    5
    And I explained this somewhere already. "Baptism INTO Christ" is a SPIRITUAL concept with a PHYSICAL application to show the spiritual. So it is ONE baptism, not TWO. You are confusing two different MODES for separate acts called baptism. They were originally to be the same. But you still have to separate the spiritual aspect from the physical in dealing with what actually saves us. "REJECT" the "other"? You seem to make it all about the water, in which case a person could just be dunked without the ["second" baptism of] the spirit, and they would still be in Christ.
    When they received the Spirit (v.6). Many had heard of Jesus, and "believed" what they heard, but still were not yet born again (note the Jews in John 8, who "believed"; yet He goes on to call them children of the devil). Especially now, that the Holy Spirit was first starting to be given out to people.
    We're also "immersed" into the Body of Christ.
    We discussd that already too. IT is both BY the Spirit, and WITH the Spirit. The Spirit is both initiator of spiritual baptism, as well as agent.
    Through faith.
    This "it makes no sense to me but I believe it by faith" proves nothing. You're having faith in the wrong thing, and it does seem to make a lot of sense to you (all the examples you have given that you think prove your view). It makes A LOT of sense to man that "I do this, and then God gives me that (salvation)". That is one of man's lifelong problems, as we see in the Israelistes, and many cults and religions today.
    What makes no sense to you is how baptism is spiritual and the water ceremony is a public sign of it that does not in itself save, but this is what the NT teaches, and you should believe in by faith.

    Once again, the examples you gave, including from Heb.11 are all from the OT, which was more works oriented (because part of it was that God was writing the lesson in history that works were not what saves; though some --and only relatively a few-- were faithful). You even try to deny that there was any "earning" involved in those examples, but the way God set those things up, they were still in a sense earning something, and this is CONTRASTED with faith for today!
    Just look at what is the point Heb.11 is making for us: how this "faith" translates to us, ther eaders. v3: "through faith, we UNDERSTAND (believe) the worlds were framed by the Word of God). Then, carrying on in the next chapter, we are told how all of this is to motivate us to "run the race" set before us, looking to Jesus. Nothing about baptism. While running the race would be manifest in works, still, it is faith that is the subject here; not the individual works that may manifest it, like those in the OT examples. We could never do works consistently enough to measure your definition of "faith", and thus salvation by. IT is faith that justifies WHEN (not even if) we fail.
    You're interpreting "become" mechanically, to mean that He gives us some "power" that enables us to work our way to becoming a Son of God. But once again, do you do everything perfectly? Yes, this would make sense, if we saw people who actually became literally perfect (NEVER committing a single sin again, and this includes false doctrine!) through some power. But actually, "power" is misinterpreted as well, as the Greek word really means "privilege". Becoming declared a son of God is a right that is given to a person instantly upon faith, not some title we work our way up to.
     
  7. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, talk about mental gymnastics. 2 different modes of the same baptism? They were originally to be the same? What happened? Are they the same or different? Baptism of the Holy Spirit was a promise from Jesus, not a command. Water baptism was instructed to be carried out by man for the remission of sins.

    In Acts 8:12But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized. 13Then Simon himself also believed; and when he was baptized he continued with Philip, and was amazed, seeing the miracles and signs which were done. 14Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, 15who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit. 16For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.

    What was the purpose of water baptism in this case?

    So they received water baptism first then spriritual baptism? 2 Modes of the same baptism? Do you have any scripture to back up what you think concerning this? Right now, I am just trying to understand your position.

    No arguements here. The scripture does teach this. I Cor 12:13, Acts 2:38, 41, 47.

    Interesting concept. Any scriptures? When did this occur in Acts 2? How about Acts 8? How about Acts 16? When does this occur? When you accept Christ? Before water baptism? After Water baptism? Again, I am trying to understand what your position.

    The question is how do we get into the light or into Christ or come in contact with his blood? Your answer was, "Through faith." I have laid out how the scriptures say we come in contact with the blood. I accept your answer based on God's definition of faith, doing what he said.


    God's word is truth. The truth is what makes us free. Whether I accept it or reject it has no bearing on what is truth. Jesus said, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved." Mark 16:16. Regardless of what anyone thinks or believes, this statement is still true. No, this is not all that the bible says about being saved, but it is certainly included. No other verse negates this verse. If you were in the crowd in Acts 2, even asking the question in verse 37, what would you have done to receive the remission of your sins? If asked the question in Acts 2:37, what would your answer be?

    So what you are saying is that one is spiritually baptized and following that there is a water ceremony as a public sign. Is that correct? Do they occur at the same time or does the spiritual baptism preceed the water baptism. You said, in Acts 19, the spiritual baptism occurred in verse 6. They were baptized in water (for a second time) in verse 5. What was their water baptism a public sign of?

    First of all, they are not my examples, they are God's. Without faith, it is impossible to please God. What kind of faith? Obedient faith as demonstrated in Heb 11. Yes, God has revealed things and I accept them through faith. In 6 days, the Lord created the heavens and the earth and all that is in them. I accept that by faith. I accept that I have a human spirit, by faith. I also accept his instructions on how to have the remission of my sins. I do this by faith. By faith, I confessed his name (Matt 10:32), by faith I repented of my sins (Acts 17:30, Acts 2:38), by faith I was buried with Christ in baptism, (Col 2:12, Acts 2:38, Acts 22:16, Mark 16:16) by By faith I become a child of God, by doing what he said to do. This is clear in Gal 3:26-27. According to the scriptures, I can only find one way INTO Christ. Once I'm a child of God, with my sins washed away by the Savior's blood, I begin my new life (Rom 6:3-4). I walk by faith. Will I walk perfectly? NO! I John 1:7-8. Will I earn any part of my salvaiton? NO!!! Will I sin? Yes. Am I continually covered by the blood as long as I walk in the light? Yes - I Jn 1:7.
     
  8. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    In Acts 11 it is on the UNBAPTIZED person that the Holy Spirit falls AND GIFTS are given.

    In 1John 1:9 it is when we CONFESS that we are forgiven.

    In Romans 10 it is when we BELIEVE with the heart and CONFESS with the mouth that we are "saved".

    The point is clear in scripture - Baptism is the act of the saved, repentant, born-again believer in following Christ - in obedience.

    It is an outward sign of an already existing - inward change.

    It is evidence that the NEW CREATION (2Cor 5) already exists - and that having already been "justified" you HAVE "peace with God" Romans 5 and in that fellowship you are choosing to follow in obedience and undergo Baptism.

    [/QUOTE]

    They were saved at the same time Christ's OWN disciples were saved - pre-cross when they "believed". They then were "Baptized" just as the Apostles James and John -- by John the baptizer.

    But in Acts 19 they "receive the special outpouring" of the Holy Spirit - including the gift of tongues.

    So in terms of salvation it is the SAME as the Acts 1l event AND the Romans 10 teaching showing without question - it is at the point of "BELIEF" that one is born-again, justified 'saved'. And then the BELIEVER follows on in the obedience of baptism.

    Here again the instruction is to hear, REPENT and believe - and then be baptized AS a born-again saved believer.

    snipping the text out of the Bible to "Stand alone" will not work.

    I notice you are avoiding Acts 11.


    In Romans 10 it is when we BELIEVE with the heart and CONFESS with the mouth that we are "saved".


    Lets take a look "At the details".

    Whosoever Believes – is saved.

    Romans 10
    saved - salvation to those who believe. The fact that one who believes and is saved will continue to read and study and obey - does not abolish the fact of salvation just as stated above - at the time we believe.
    Salvation comes to the one who confesses and believes. Then we go on to follow in the works of obedience – including water Baptism

    In Acts 11 the entire subject is about the validity of Baptism -- for non-Jews.

    It can hardly be claimed that "this is not a passage that mentions baptism".

    In Romans 10 the entire section is about the subject of "WHEN is a person saved". Ignoring the chapter as if it "had nothing to say about that" is not a valid approach to scripture.

    In Romans 6:1-10 it most certainly IS described as an outward symbol of our being WITH Christ in HIS death and HIS resurrection.

    (assuming of course you did not go back in time "literally" at your baptism).

    The argument you are using tries to wrap a somewhat myopic view of scripture (selecting some texts while avoiding others) into a wooden definition that is unsupportable. Everyone (at least those who accept believer's baptism) agree to the point that in Baptism we identify with Christ's work on the cross for us - and it is in that work (and our identification in His death and resurrection) that accomplishes the removal of sin.

    But you "take it to extremes" claiming that we are not born-again, not justified, not saved, not a new creation, still in the old wicked "flesh" at the time of belief, repentance and baptism.

    Nothing could be farther from the truth of scripture.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  9. chadman

    chadman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    DHK said
    Oh, 'Cmon, Give me a little break here DHK. I could ask you or anybody else the same thing. Wouldn't you agree you are just a tad inflamatory, even to Evangelicals like yourself?

    The sinners prayer? It saves those who ask Jesus to save them, calling on His name, just as the Bible teaches. Yes I know ultimately under the theological covers, by Grace through Faith not of works. I know that. It is a rite of passage.

    Where did I get that idea? Billy Graham and Bob Ryan,your brother in arms, both say the sinner's prayer (sincere) will save you. Look at Bob's post point number 2. Is Bob Ryan wrong?

    you said
    It does not you are correct, but it CAN be, and is Biblical to state the obvious.

    No --- the Sinner Prayer, it is not in the Bible explicitly, you know that and we all know that. It is the manifested act of faith that fullfils the offer to 'believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord', or to 'call upone His name'. See that? Confess with your MOUTH? There is nothing wrong with that, it is Biblical. If you ask Jesus to save you, come into your life, He promises that He will not turn away anyone who comes to Him. So if you call on Jesus, He will save you. You say it so well, I think I'll quote you to yourself now...

    "If you care not to believe it you put yourself in direct contradiction to the Bible, and have started to believe a false gospel as well.If you don't believe that, then you are in danger of believing a false gospel. This is why many are not really saved when they think they are."

    Is that not an absolutely edifying statement? I know it made ME feel good when you said it. :)

    Anyways, you never answer many of my questions so I had antother one for you that I was personally curious about in agreement with you on, so I'll make another post, so it does not get overlooked.

    In fact I have noticed on this board, that maybe 90% of peoples questions are skimmed over, and never addressed? Are we asking each other questions as debate points, or are we actually trying to learn something from each other? I don't get it.
     
  10. chadman

    chadman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, I have not studied the use of 'eis', so I am out on this discussion but found it very interesting. I think MMAN asked the question in response to DHK (I think). Hehe, and this is the one that caught my real attention, but I don't remember a response.

    I guess this confuses me too. Anyone care to tackle this one? He makes a good point, and a linguist might agree with him here, based on an established pattern of usage and context. Why is this the case? For my own comfort please? The only thing I can think is you have two differnt authors, maybe two different usages?
     
  11. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
     
  12. ituttut

    ituttut New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen again. This is the Christian message, of which was not known until after Damascus Road. Since God had hidden this information from the beginning until Saul/Paul, how can you justify saying Moses, David, or any of the Law and the prophets came to the Father through faith in Jesus Christ? They didn’t even know His name, and Jesus had not shed His blood, so it was impossible for them to come as we today. Those all had to endure until the end. We today are saved immediately upon believing on name of the Lord Jesus Christ for our salvation.

    Our dispensation, or generation from the gospel of Paul is the only one that is not required to do a work. Noah had to do a work; Abraham had to get away from His idol worshipping people, and had to be circumcised as did every male Israelite, and proselyte from then on. They had to live under the law and do as it said, or at least try. And when prophesy picks up where it left off, works will again be required of Gods national Israel, and any that tag along on their coattails.

    In this dispensation, why are we not required to do one thing? Jesus Christ did all of the work for us, and offers us the free gift, if we will only take it. The kingdom of Christ must be getting close to what He has been promised by His Father. When it is full, we will be caught up to Him in the air, to be with Him forever, and will be as He, and then will the Jew earnestly and fervently be praying, Our Father, Which Art in Heaven……….give us our daily bread………deliver us from evil.Christian faith, ituttut Galatians 1:11-12
     
  13. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reply to ituttut

    Jesus said in Mark 16:15-16, "And He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. 16He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned."

    Notice, it was one gospel. Notice it was to be preached to the whole world (would include Gentiles). Notice, the person who believes and is baptized shall be saved. Notice, those who do not believe will be condemned.

    This began on the day of Pentecost. It is the gospel of Christ, not John the Baptist. Where did that come from??? Not from scripture.

    Matthew records in Matt 28:18-20, "And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." Amen"

    They were to go to all nations (this would include Gentiles) and teach the same thing (teach, baptize, teach) to everyone who then were taught to go and teach what they had been taught (to go teach, baptize, and teach). These instructions began to be carried out on the day of Pentecost, in Acts 2.

    In Acts 1:8, Jesus said, "But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth." (to the end of the earth would include Gentiles).

    Acts 2:38-39 Then Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call."

    This promise was for the Jews and Gentiles.

    Paul makes it plain that the law was what seperated the Jews and the Gentiles.

    Eph 2:14-18 For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, 16and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity. 17And He came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near. 18For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father.

    The middle law was put to death, no longer valid, upon the death of Jesus on the Cross. No longer two different ways, but the SAME way to Christ.

    Eph 3:3-6 how that by revelation He made known to me the mystery (as I have briefly written already, 4by which, when you read, you may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ), 5which in other ages was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to His holy apostles and prophets: 6that the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel,

    It had been revealed also the the other apostles and prophets how God would make the Gentiles fellow heirs by the same gospel.

    Paul then goes on to say in Eph 4:5, "one Lord, one faith, one baptism;" Not two faiths, one for the Jew and one for the Gentiles, not 2 baptisms one for the Jews and one for the Gentiles. Jesus had taken away what separated them when he died on the cross.

    Paul also said in Col 1:19 For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, 20and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross. 21And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled 22in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight-- 23if indeed you continue in the faith, grounded and steadfast, and are not moved away from the hope of the gospel which you heard, which was preached to every creature under heaven, of which I, Paul, became a minister.

    THE gospel was preached to every creature under heaven (Jews and Gentiles). The same gospel. Not two different ways for the Jews and Gentiles to be saved. Jews and Gentiles were reconciled by the blood of His Cross since the law that separated them was removed.

    Col 2:12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead. 13And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, 14having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.

    Again, the law was taken out of the way at the cross, it was nailed to the cross. Baptism is described as a burial and being raised. Baptism is done through faith, whether Jew or Gentile.

    Or as Paul told the Galatians, "22But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. 24Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. 26For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

    Notice verse 26, that we might be justified by faith. Verse 27, For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. Who are the "we" and the "many" who entered into Chirst? Vs 28, Jews, Greeks, slaves, free, males, females - I think that covers all mankind.

    This ties back to Acts 2:38-39 and also compliments Eph 2:8-9.
     
  14. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no doubt that the Holy Spirit was given to those in Acts 10 and as retold in Acts 11, prior to their baptism in water. Let's look at the circumstances. I think everyone understands these were the first Gentile converts. Until this point, the gospel had been preached to the Jews.

    Notice what God told Cornelius, Acts 11:14 "and he will speak words to you by which you will be saved, you and all your household."

    When Peter began to speak (vs 15), the Holy Spirit fell on them. This baptism of the Holy Spirit reminded Peter of what had happened to the Apostles in Acts 2 (verse 16). Does this occur today or was it to let Peter and more importantly those with Peter know for certain that the Gospel was for the Gentiles also (Acts 10:45-47). If water baptism is an outward sign of something inward, why would water baptism be given to those who had outward signs? Surely nobody today recieves the Holy Spirit like Cornelius and his household. Can people today speak in foreign languages that they have not previously known when some start to tell them the gospel? Acts 2 and Acts 10 are the only recorded places that specifically mention people being baptized with the Holy Spirit. The first time, the Jews were added to the Church, the second time, the Gentiles.

    Why did those believers in Acts 19 not receive it the same way as Cornelius? If you read Acts 18, Apollos most likely taught them concerning Jesus, but he only knew John's baptism (which was no longer valid). Therefore, these believers were asked if they received the Holy Spirit when they believed (Acts 19:2). What a strange question if it happens automatically. Did the inspired Apostle not understand about baptism of the Holy Spirit? They were baptized again in water, because their first baptism was not valid. Obviously, their baptism was more than just getting wet.

    When they answered they had not even heard of the Holy Spirit, Paul asked, "And he said, "Into what then were you baptized?" Notice, he did ask if they were baptized? Paul understood that baptism is part of belief or as he later stated a part of faith (Gal 3:26-27). Their baptism was not an outward "sign" of anything.

    Paul then laid hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit, and they began speaking with tongues and prophesying.

    The rulers in John 12:42 who believed but would not confess would be saved under the new law, right?

    On the day of Pentecost, (Acts 2:37) these people believed. If they didn't believe they would have gone about their business, continuing to think the Apostles were drunk, and paid them no mind. It was obvious from their question that they believed, hence it would have been pointless to tell them to believe.

    If they were saved when they believed, why did Peter tell them to do anything? Why didn't he instruct them in the "sinners prayer"? Why do you suppose he gave them instructions to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins if their sins were already remitted? If at the point of belief one is saved, then repentance is not required, because that was instructions given to them past their point of belief. Clearly, their baptism was "for the remission of sins" just the same as Jesus blood being shed for many "for the remission of sins" (Matt 26:28)

    Later in Acts 2:44, it describes those who had believed, repented and been baptized, simply as "those who had believed". Now substitute these believers (and what they did that is summed up as believed) into a verse like John 3:16 and John 3:36, "He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him." (NASV)

    The same is true for those in Act 16:31 They said, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."
    32And they spoke the word of the Lord to him together with all who were in his house.

    33And he took them that very hour of the night and washed their wounds, and immediately he was baptized, he and all his household.

    34And he brought them into his house and set food before them, and rejoiced greatly, having believed in God with his whole household.

    Summary, told to believe, spoke the word of the Lord to them, baptized, rejoiced having believed.

    I am not ignoring anything. Romans 10 fits perfectly with everything I have described. When you have the proper understanding of belief and faith, it all fits perfectly. Romans 10 does not negate the conversion examples in Acts, it only compliments them.

    If you say a person is saved at the point of belief (mental assent), then that is in direct contradiction with what Jesus said in Mark 16:16, "He that believes and is baptized shall be saved..." Yet if you understand "believed" in Acts 2:44 and Acts 16:34, then it all fits.

    I'm not sure I understand what you are accusing me of. The bible teaches that we are a new creation at the time of our belief, repentance and baptism.

    II Cor 5:17 says, "Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come."

    How do we get into Christ? The waters of baptism. Why are we baptized? Faith.

    You can search the bible, cover to cover, and you can only find one way INTO Christ, and that is baptism (Rom 6:3-4, Gal 3:26-27). When do we have newness of life? Romans 6:4 says,"Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.

    Spirit baptism is not a burial and resurrection, but our baptism in water is. When does the new life begin? When we are raised from our watery grave.

    I do not need to repeat that the power is in the blood and not the water. Read my original message for a further discussion on that.
     
  15. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess this confuses me too. Anyone care to tackle this one? He makes a good point, and a linguist might agree with him here, based on an established pattern of usage and context. Why is this the case? For my own comfort please? The only thing I can think is you have two differnt authors, maybe two different usages? </font>[/QUOTE]You are a mystery to me. You are a very intriguing individual.

    A question we all need to ask ourselves, is do I study God’s word to get the truth or to prove what I already believe? People should NOT believe what I say, just because I said it. We need to be like the Bereans in Acts 17:11 who, were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

    I encourage people to study it for themselves, not to prove what you already believe, but to take God at his word. There is no one passage that is exhaustive, telling all a person must do to be saved. It has to be studied and rightly divided.

    Jesus’ statement in Mark 16:16 is so plain a child can understand it, yet it has been twisted and re-arranged by people trying to make it fit everything else they believe. Some will say the same thing about me not believing Eph 2:8-9, which is an outright lie. I have explained time and time again how perfectly this fits together with the rest of the scripture. No, it will not fit if you use your own definitions of faith, but when you use what the scripture has provided, it fits perfectly, no twisting required.

    I don’t expect any answer to the Acts 2:38 and Matt 26:28 question. I can assure you, any attempt will require some serious mental gymnastics.

    You know, I think baptism is the ultimate act of faith. You look at how much resistance there is to it. People belittle it’s importance, change it’s meaning, say it’s spiritual and not in water, call people names and label them with titles who believe it, accuse them of works salvation, accuse them of believing the power is in the water and not in the blood, and so on.

    When done in faith, wash and be clean – what could be simpler?
     
  16. Eric B

    Eric B Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2001
    Messages:
    4,838
    Likes Received:
    5
    "modes" was a bad word. But for lack of better terminoliogy at the moment. Still; there is one spiritual baptism evidenced by water baptism. No "two' baptisms.
    You can argue that that promise was based on a command to keep commandments (John 14:15-17). And Jesus' "spirit baptism was contrasted with John's water baptism. If we are to take your "this is two baptisms logic" then that would show that the one baptism of the NT is spirit only, and water ("for the remission of sins" Mk.1:4) has been superseded. But that is not true; is it? This shows that the two forms are one baptism.
    Better yet; what was the purpose of them receiving the Spirit after being baptized; since it's the baptism that puts them in Christ and saves them? I think this makes it pretty clear that baptism is not efficacious in itself.
    As you yourself just elaborated, the Holy Spirit was just being given out to gentiles. So they went ahead and obeyed and were baptized, but the spirit still did not come to them until then. Afterwards, the Spirit would comedurung baptism. But we can see here that when they are separated; which one it is that regenerates.
    2 baptism & repentance at same time

    8(mid) as was just said; when the Spirit fell on them after baptism

    8(end) baptism & repentance at same time

    19 baptism & repentance at same time. It's purpose was because they had only been baptized by John "for remissions of sins". But the ministry of John was only until Christ; just as the animal sacrifices. these things would not be recognized in the NT. So they had to be baptized into Christ; spiritually, and shown through water baptism in Jesus' name (not John's).

    16 he was saved when he believed, as Paul said; the he was baptized at the same time as his family, after they were preached to. (IT doesn't say he wasn't saved until then).

    So we see in all of these cases; it is not the dunking in water that saves. It was to be done at the same time one preofessed Christ, if possible. But it was clearly faith that saved, and baptism would only be a PART of faith; not the very dfeinition of faith itself, as you have been using it!
    But it's still the faith that saves, not the works done to show tht faith.
    They were given a test of faith. If you believe in Jesus now, you must show it somehow. If you don't believe; it doesn't matter what you do. "Believe" is clearly the subject in Mk, not the showing of it. Remember, Jesus said "whoever confesses me before men, him shall the Son of man confess before the angels of God. But whoever denies me before men shall be denied before the angels of God" (Luke 12:8,9)
    So for them to refuse baptism would be seen as a denial of Christ "before men". That is why salvation seems so tied to baptism in those passages. But it clearly is not, even as your own example in Acts 8 shows.
    But you're using them for your argument, and they don't match.
    To repeat, baptism is to be apart of faith, not the very definition of "saving faith" itself!
    And what is "walking in the light"? Just "trying"? Failing, but God only covers you as long as you "keep trying"? This is what all of you works-righteousness advocates do not understand. Noe of us even walks in the light perfectly. Where does God draw the line? Or do we get to draw it for Him? Just be baptized and join the true Church, and try to live good, then God will overlook your flaws. This is basically what Jews and Muslims believe (minus the baptism; --or is that the only reason they are lost?)
    So if faith is "why"; that is WHY we are saved. (and the waters only symbolize whatis going on in the spirit; they do not equal faith or bring salvation or a person into Christ themselves.
    So we are right back to where we started. This "burial and resurrection" is SPIRITUAL, and only SYMBOLized with water. You claim this makes two baptisms, but that was disproven above.
    And you're quoting these passage to prove what you believe, and not to get the truth. You start with the assumption that your CofC teaching IS the truth, so how could you do otherwise? Once again, "he who believes and is baptized shall be saved" is based on thepremise that baptism would be a public confession (Lk.12) of Christ. Without belief, it would not matter whether you were baptized or not. There is no twisting on our side. You twist it to make BAPTISM the subject, and means of salvation, but clearly it is not.
    The washing is spiritual, so the agent of the actual washing would be the Spirit! What could be simpler?
    Once again, it's not like we all are too lazy to go and be baptized; or we are rationalistic skeptics who think it is some stupid little thing that makes no sense. Most of us here have been baptized. So we have no reason to resist it-- unless it is being made into something that contradicts the Gospel: a work that brings salvation!
     
  17. chadman

    chadman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    MMAN you said -

    Well I agree most people, those on this forum more than normal, break all the pieces of the Bible up to get it to fit the 'gospel' theology they have been taught. I won't disagree here, just read any of these posts carefully.

    Here is one sincere observation above all others I have seen on this board.

    Many of us Evangelicals simply refuse to believe what our non-evangelical brothers are saying that they believe. Then we pound them with the same ol arguments hoping it will somehow 'sink in' without 'dealing' with what they have told us they really believe. It is simply to traumatic to our frail confidence in our interpretations, to believe that anyobdy could possibly know what we know, and honestly have a different interpretation. A ghastly thought!

    This is an objective raw observation that surely others would agree to if they were honest.

    Another observation I see here, is a complete arrogance in some, not personally distinguishing or acknowledging between their Interpretation and the Bible as it stands apart from their interpretation. They speak as if their Interpretation IS the Bible.

    There is simply, from a educated intellectual standpoint, no credibility to such folks who make these type of assumptions, even if they are blind to them. They come across as hard, inflexible, unreasonable, and frankly inept, hopefully by intentional design, and not by sheer ignorance to the situation. Because unfortunately, if the latter case, then apptitude can be impossible to penetrate with sound reason.

    I am really not here to hack on my own brothers in Christ. But folks, there is somewhat of a serious problem here, when we cannot acknowledge even that our own sytematic theologies are based on subjective interpretation. Unless Jesus or the twelve Apostles themselves handed it to us in person and tutored us on every book, then what we have now, is a subjective interpretation. No matter how true or pure that interpretation may be, it is that very thing. An interpretation. Which when coupled with our current splintered versions of what the gospel really is, makes our intpretations ultimately a probablity among many instances of the same.
     
  18. chadman

    chadman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    EricB said to mman
    Hey Eric, they guy is COC, so is it possible he believes that during the commanded act to be baptized (in his view baptism is not man work but Gods work), Being taken into the water in obedience, that at that moment, and having faith in Christ, that he is spiritually baptized while in the water, the two being perhaps inextricably linked? This would make every verse of baptism, faith, works, and all the texts fit together without trying to use 'eis' in multiple modes in his view.

    Just an overservation and thought...Isn't that sort of what Catholics believe?

    It has always been hard for me as a Baptist to explain deeply what is happening, but I like the work recapitulation when describing a person recieveing Christ, being reborn. We say it happens in the very midst of a prayer of faith, calling on Jesus in an instant in time.

    So then, the COC or RCC, they believe this very same thing happens during the very act of water baptism? This does not seem difficult to comprehend what they are saying they believe. If that is in fact, what they are saying, I don't fully know.
     
  19. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Eric, they guy is COC, so is it possible he believes that during the commanded act to be baptized (in his view baptism is not man work but Gods work), Being taken into the water in obedience, that at that moment, and having faith in Christ, that he is spiritually baptized while in the water, the two being perhaps inextricably linked? This would make every verse of baptism, faith, works, and all the texts fit together without trying to use 'eis' in multiple modes in his view.

    Just an overservation and thought...Isn't that sort of what Catholics believe?

    It has always been hard for me as a Baptist to explain deeply what is happening, but I like the work recapitulation when describing a person recieveing Christ, being reborn. We say it happens in the very midst of a prayer of faith, calling on Jesus in an instant in time.

    So then, the COC or RCC, they believe this very same thing happens during the very act of water baptism? This does not seem difficult to comprehend what they are saying they believe. If that is in fact, what they are saying, I don't fully know.
    </font>[/QUOTE]I have no idea what the RCC teaches concerning baptism. I know they baptize infants, who can not believe, repent, or confess which is certainly contrary to examples and instruction in scripture.

    Chadman, I would not have used those words, but that is not too far off. For clarificaiton, the power is in the blood, not in the water. Jesus said in John 3:5, "Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." Also stated in I Cor 12:13, "For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body,". The body is the Church (Eph 1:22-23, Col 1:18).

    When we go back to Act 2 to see how people entered the church, lets start with a verse I'm sure everyone is familiar with by now, Acts 2:38 which states, "Then Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

    Verse 41 states, "Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them."

    Verse 47 says "praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily those who were being saved."

    When looked in total, those that received his word were baptized for the remission of sins and the Lord added the saved to the church.
     
  20. mman

    mman New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reply to Eric B:

    Is there anything I could really say or show you to change your mind?

    You say you've proved it was not water baptism. I'm sorry, I have missed the proof.

    I Pet 3:21 is clearly water baptism. If it is not water baptism, then his whole example of Noah is meaningless. The last word in verse 20 is water.

    I Pet 3:21, "There is also an antitype which now saves us--baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,"

    Antitype of what? His example he just gave how Noah was saved through water.

    What is an antitype? If you walk in the sand, how does you foot compare to the footprint left in the sand? One is the type, the other is the antitype.

    Noah was saved though water (How?, By faith he did what God said and was saved (Heb 11:7)) His was a physical saving. There is an antitype that saves us, immersion. There is no cleansing power of the water itself, it is knowing that you are obeying God.

    Rom 6 is talking about immersion also. It is a burial and resurrection. One cannot be buried in the spirit then raised out of the spirit in which they were immersed. In verse 17, they had obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine. What form? As described in vs 3-4, the death burial and resurrection and this was done in baptism.

    Acts 8:35, the Philip preached Jesus. In the very next verse, the eunuch was asking about water baptism. Preaching Jesus includes water baptism.

    OK, since I will be accused of believing in works salvation, water regeneration, and believing in some ancient Hindu practice, etc. - Let me state, none of these are true. Anyone who would assign beliefs to me that I do not have does not understand what I am saying. I fully believe in Eph 2:8-9. I am a child of God by faith (Gal 3:26-27). Baptism is not a work of merit but an action of faith, the same as confession and repentance, all things you "do".
     
Loading...