1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Believer’s Communion with Restrictions: Not Closed, Close, or Open--But Biblical

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Pastor Tim S, May 22, 2017.

  1. Pastor Tim S

    Pastor Tim S New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2017
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Believer’s Communion with Restrictions: Not Closed Communion, Not Close Communion, Not Open Communion—But Biblical Communion.

    While canvassing the community for my church, I met a couple who were not interested in us because they believe in closed communion. This was even though they were not going to any church because they couldn’t find one suitable. This led to an intensive study of Scripture on my part and I learned a lot of new things I would like to share.

    1. Both ordinances of the church are about the Gospel. Baptism (by immersion) is focused on the work of Christ for our salvation (Romans 1:16, 1 Corinthians 15:2-8). It symbolically portrays our being co-crucified, co-buried, and co-risen with Christ (Romans 6:3-9).

    Communion is focused on the person of Christ (John 20:31). For salvation a person needs to get the work of Christ right (Romans 1:16) and the person of Christ right (John20:31). There are a number of verses that need to dovetail for how communion fits into this:

    A. John 6:29-58 Jesus says that a person needs to eat His body and drink His blood to receive eternal life. However, five times (verses 29, 35, 36, 40, 47) in this passage He states that eternal life is received by believing in Him. It is obvious that the eating and drinking are symbolic of belief. Eating and drinking represent believing from the heart, not just from the head, which was the problem with those in His audience. Communion is the public proclaiming of our already existing, saving faith by eating and drinking the elements. It acts out the message of John 6. As a mnemonic device, baptism acts out Romans 6 and communion acts out John 6. Both act out the Gospel.

    B. At the end of the meal in which Jesus gave the Last Supper/First Communion He prayed a lengthy prayer for the disciples and for those who would believe in Him through them. In John 17:21,23 of that prayer Jesus asked the Father to give us believers the same unity within those in the group of all believers that He and the Father have in each other, that we would all be one. This has nothing to do with ecumenical unity, in which many professing believers are actually false. By contrast, the Shepherd knows His sheep (John 10:14). It is a spiritual unity, one which every believer automatically has through the indwelling Holy Spirit with every other believer. God accurately knows the exact spiritual status of every person, even if we don’t. These verses teach that every true believer is in God and He is in all true believers. Communion symbolically portrays Christ in us because of our faith in Him and us in Him as we all make up the one bread (See 1 Corinthians 10:16-17 discussed next). Every believer possesses this indwelling and unity; it has nothing to do with local church membership.

    C. 1 Corinthians 10:16-17. Eating the bread during a communion service is participating in the body of Christ by physically acting out the eating of Jesus’ body in John 6 mentioned above. It represents salvation by faith by one who already believes its symbolism. Likewise, drinking of the cup is participating in the blood of Christ. It represents salvation by faith by one who already believes its symbolism.

    Verse 17 talks about how there is one bread which consists of all who believe in Christ, per John 17. That one bread, which symbolizes Christ, is to be taken by all believers present, as representing how Christ is present in every believer. Limiting this to a local church destroys the message Christ is trying to portray. Church membership is NOT a part of the Gospel. So, 1 Corinthians 10 has all believers in its perspective and has nothing to do with local church membership.

    2. 1 Corinthians 12:13 talks about how everyone who believes in Christ is baptized into the body of Christ at the moment of his salvation. It is at this time that he drinks of the Spirit (i.e., receives the indwelling Holy Spirit) and receives His spiritual gift(s). 1 Corinthian 12 relates the gift a person receives with his position in the body. Equating “body” in 1 Corinthians 12 with the local church leads to a false Gospel. Since a person is not saved unless he possesses the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:9), then he cannot be saved until he is placed in this body and receives the Holy Spirit. However, he cannot join a church until he has been saved and baptized. So, there are only two options: salvation, baptism, and church membership are simultaneous, mutually required events or 1 Corinthians 12 has nothing to do with church membership. A Gospel which requires all three as simultaneous events is a false Gospel, so 1 Corinthians 12 has nothing to do with church membership. The body of Christ in 1 Corinthians 12 refers to all believers, all who are in Christ per John 17:21.

    3. Sandwiched between 1 Corinthians 10 and 12, both of which talk about the universal body of Christ is 1 Corinthians chapter 11. There is no Scriptural basis to claim that the Corinthian church practiced closed communion as a basis for discounting the message of this chapter. The context of chapters 10 and 12 requires otherwise. This chapter explains how to conduct communion.

    The message here is very simple. Verse 11:28 says, “But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup.” This is the key, basic verse telling the proper procedure on how to conduct a communion service.

    First, an explanation needs to be given during a communion service that a person needs to make an honest evaluation of his spiritual condition. If he is not a believer in Christ as Savior and participates, then God takes severe offense of his public proclamation of believing when he doesn’t. If a person is a believer, he needs to examine himself to make sure that there is nothing between him and God and that there is not some sin that needs to be confessed. Otherwise, he is commanded to refrain. Once a person has made a satisfactory self-examination, he is free to participate. Then there is joy in publically acknowledging our Savior and identifying with Him and other believers in this proclamation. But, woe to the person that participates unworthily. God can judge him severely.

    The Biblical standard of a proper communion service is that first a person examines himself. This is a formal examination that needs to be led by the one who is officiating the service. Next, 1 Corinthians 11:18 says, “and so let him eat and drink.” The church is not to evaluate the self-judgment—God specifically declares that He Himself is the One to do this.

    As a Baptist, I believe in the priesthood of the believer. Closed communion denies the priesthood of the believer, it denies the protocol God established in this chapter, and it denies the oneness of all believers with all believers in Christ and Christ in all believers, as Jesus taught in John 17:21, 23. As such, it changes the message God wants conveyed and is to be shunned.

    4. The logic behind closed communion is mostly based on human reasoning, starting with all references to the church in the New Testament being of the local church, of the church being guardian over the service, and of communion being given for special, private fellowship of a local assembly. None of this stated directly in Scripture. It is only implied and requires a sequence of logically sounding steps based on human reasoning. Closed communion sets aside clear teachings of Scripture, placing human reasoning ahead of clear teaching. It changes the message from representing the Gospel and the universal relationship of all believers in Christ through the Gospel to one of special fellowship by a small subset of believers for their private benefit. This changes the message, cheapening it in the process. As such it should not be expected to please God.

    5. Church discipline can override communion privileges. However, that is a disciplinary issue, made in consequence to specific actions that need correction. Closed and close communion deny participation rights of some believers even when there have been no disciplinary actions taken. This is not the biblical standard as presented in these verses.

    This is a short synopsis of an analysis posted online at www.trbap.org/communion.doc
     
    #1 Pastor Tim S, May 22, 2017
    Last edited: May 22, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ONLY requirement of the Bible is one is to be saved, and to not have unconfessed/unrepenting sin activity going on at the time!
     
  3. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Welcome to Baptistboard.
    Some who believe in the local church only fence the table.
    You alluded to this in the last part of your article.
    I have been in both kind of churches and respect their view to keep it closed if they see thatBaptist board.
    I WILL offer more when I get to a keyboard.
     
  4. Pastor Tim S

    Pastor Tim S New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2017
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi Iconoclast,
    Thanks for your reply. If you have opportunity to read the full article linked at the end of the post before replying, it has ten times as much content as the post, literally. You might better understand why I believe closed communion corrupts the message God wants conveyed (acting out the inherent unity of all believers Jesus taught in John 17, which was presented during the same meeting in which the Last Supper was instuted). The potential significance of closed (and close) communion is discussed. Moses was disciplined for messing up the symbolism in the message God wanted communicated when he struck the rock twice at Kadesh instead of merely speaking to it. In response God kept him from entering the promised land.
    I believe closed communion corrupts the message God wants conveyed. As such, it is potentially a sinful practice. If you have comments based on the full analysis, that would be appreciated. If I have missed something, I would like to know about it. On the other hand, I believe it is serious enough an issue to warrant a full discussion.

    http://www.trbap.org/communion.doc is the link to the full article.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Youthguy

    Youthguy New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    At our church we practice close communion. It was discussed several years ago about going to open communion, but the leaders in the church were concerned that it compromised what we defined as how a person was saved. If we say that all are welcomed to participate that are saved, born again believers, does that men we accept salvation as, faith + baptism, or faith + speaking in tongues as salvation, or faith + church membership + baptism as salvation. We believe that Salvation is as defined in Romans 10:8-13 and Ephesians 2:4-10. God's grace and our faith saves us. The reason we do not offer open communion is there are so many different ideas of what the saving gospel really is.

    This is my first post on this site and have been following this site for about a year. Just now brave enough to get my feet wet.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Pastor Tim S

    Pastor Tim S New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2017
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi Youthguy.
    I am new at this, too. Yesterday was my first post.

    The problem from my perspective is that the arguments you present make complete sense rationally, but contradict Scripture, at least from how I understand it. The Biblical standard is that a formal time of self-examination precede the distribution of the elements. This self-examination is a witnessing opportunity to any unsaved present. It presses home the issue of, "What are you going to do with Christ? Reject Him? Recognize His holiness and authority and repent of anything between you and Him? It needs to be made clear that God evaluates a person's response, whatever it is, and that the response has eternal consequences for everyone, saved and saved alike. It concerns the level of eternal rewards for believer and the level of condemnation for the unbeliever. I do not have the ability to judge whether a person is qualified to take communion. I do not want a person to think that if he manages to pass my evaluation that everything is OK between him and God.

    God does not ask me to judge the requirements for participation. This is His responsibility according to 1 Corinthians 11. The Biblical procedure is clear:

    1 Corinthians 11:28 "But let a man examine himself [this is the formal time of examination mentioned above] and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup [after the self-examination, the church is to let the one who still desires to participate to do so]. Disciplinary issues are different. But, discipline is to be done to those who have committed some action worthy of it. Closed communion effectively disciplines Godly believers on the basis that maybe they are not actually Godly.

    I would suggest you get the complete article into the hands of your church leadership. See if there are weaknesses in the analysis or if it makes sense. The goal of all of us (hopefully) is to be faithful before God, not man.
     
    #6 Pastor Tim S, May 23, 2017
    Last edited: May 23, 2017
  7. Felipe Rios

    Felipe Rios Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2017
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    24
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is my quick answer: If the ordinance is for the local church then that would mean that each local church partakes of this ordinance privately, meaning closed. At our church, we do not call it "closed" but "covenant" communion. Only those who have made the "covenant" to be faithful to Christ and his "local" church are able to partake of the Lord's Supper.
    The idea of open communion comes from the teaching of a Universal Church. If the Church is universal, then open communion makes perfect sense. But biblically, the "church" is always local (at least here on earth), so open communion would not make sense. How can the "body" of that local church examine itself (1 Cor.11:28) if there are people there (visitors) who are not members of the body? Why should the non-members be allowed to partake of something given to the "body of Christ?"
    This is a short version of why the Lord's Super is "closed" and not "close or open."
     
  8. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks for sharing. I had to do a quick read with distractions, so I may have missed some succinct points. Will hope to read the entire linked piece later (I did glance at it as well).
    That's interesting, considering that there is a least one Baptist Church in Greenville that practices closed communion.

    What in the text leads you to conclude that self-examination is a formal part of the service? By formal do you just mean that the one officiating calls on participants to examine themselves? Is there a formal verbal or outward acknowledgement by each participant that he or she has performed the self-examination?

    Do you agree with the GARBC statement "that the Biblical order of the ordinances is baptism first and then the Lord’s Supper, and that participants in the Lord’s Supper should be immersed believers" -- that is, is the examination and supper only offered to immersed believers? (It may just be my quick read, but I wasn't sure if you are arguing for that.)

    Finally, one thing that can confuse a discussion on the limits of the Lord's supper is that different people bring different backgrounds and different definitions to terms such as close communion and open communion. For example, some who use the term "close communion" define it to mean anyone possessing immersion baptism and church membership in any Bible-believing church.

    I think we could be better off discarding the terms -- not altogether, since they are in use. But discarding the terms when discussing who should participate and asking what restrictions do the Bible place on participation. (Any Bible-believing church believes there are some restrictions. There are possibly full-fledged ecumenists and universalists that deny the exclusivity of salvation in Christ who argue there are no restrictions.)
     
  9. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree. In my opinion there are only two viable choices. Open and Closed.

    "Close" is a misnomer. If a door is "almost closed" it is still open. It can be open a little or open a lot but it is still open.

    Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 5:8 that it is our responsibility to refuse fellowship to those living in sin and that, in reference to the Lord's Supper, they are "not to eat."

    As the Lord's Supper is a Unity Feast, to partake with someone we don't know, and allow them to set the criteria of whether or not they eat, is to allow an outside influence control our church and who we unite with in the Lord's Supper.

    So we have two options. Open, allowing people we don't know determine who we unite with, or Closed, limiting participation to our own, known, church family.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think we basically agree on this, although I think even "open" (unrestricted) is something of a misnomer if we are talking churches that have any semblance of Bible belief.

    I have come to think of it something like this. The door is closed. Those who approach give the doorkeeper their password and if they have the right password they can come in. In some churches the "password" is "I'm a believer." In others it is "I'm a baptized believer." In others it is "I'm a baptized believer who is a member of a Bible-believing church." And in others it is "I'm a member of this church." There are views that fit in between some of these. To me, though, this should help people who advocate open communion to see that even they are putting some restriction on participation in the supper even while often thinking they do not.
     
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The bilical requirements for communion seem to be saved by God, and not in open rebellion against Him, correct?
     
  12. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    10,544
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Faith:
    Baptist
  13. tyndale1946

    tyndale1946 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    11,001
    Likes Received:
    2,396
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The church I grew up in was Primitive Baptist Old School and our communion was closed and only opened to those who were of our same faith and order... These other churches were know as sister churches and as TC stated they were of our church family... Our communion was open only to our church family, even the Lords supper and feet washing... There are other who have stated for open and some for close and others for closed... Each body of believers have their own way of how they conduct communion in their churches, I told you mine... Whenever and by what mode we take communion we must keep in mind one thing, the reason for it... Brother Glen:)

    1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:

    11:24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

    11:25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

    11:26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.

     
  14. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Got some bible to support that?
     
  15. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    26,995
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi Pastor Tim and Youthguy,
    Welcome and you both started well, honestly and clearly presenting your views of biblical doctrine.

    My view is Paul leaves participating in communion up to the professing believer. It is up to him or her as to whether to eat the bread and drink the cup in remembrance of Him. Nothing wrong, as Paul did, in explaining who should or should not participate. Basically it comes down to this, could a person with a flawed understanding of salvation doctrine be born anew by the grace of God. My answer is yes.
     
  16. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I know my position is rather idiosyncratic. As I stated above, I go with close (member of a church of like faith and order) with the exhortation during the service for participants to examine themselves. I came to my position due to a couple of factors:
    • My home church regularly has visitors from outside the area. Last Sunday we had folks from other states, Scotland, and Northern England (Newcastle-on-Tyne).
    • I view the service around the Lord's Table as a time of commemoration and fellowship.
    • Unless they are fairly spiritually mature nobody comes to San Francisco to go to church. So, there's a bit of a self selection factor in play.
    I can understand other churches having stricter criteria. I would support the same if:
    • the visitors came from the surrounding community.
    • the visitors were in the main church hoppers.

     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, paul states to us that the person taking it needs to be in a saved relationship with Jesus, and not to have unconfessed.unrepentent sinning in their lives at time of the partaking.
     
  18. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Got some bible to support that?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My problem with closed communion is that there is some fear factor of polluting the assembly, and or some outside the faith might bring rebuke to the assembly.

    Perhaps it would be good to have those supporting closed communion to give Scripture support for their view, just as the op did in support of that view.
     
  20. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Communion is closed to only being partook of by real Christians....
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
Loading...