Featured HCSB to the CSB

It is interesting to note that in all the posts I have made in this thread comparing the CSB with the NIV --all of the NIV renderings are identical to the TNIV.

There is nothing, NOTHING, in the NIV/TNIV readings that encourages a feminist mindset, a blurring of gender distinctions, advocating women as pastors, or any of the myriad false claims made by Y1. People claiming to be Christians need to be truth-tellers.

 

So the CSB is more than just a name change to the "Hard Core Southern Baptist" translation?

 

I think its the new, not so hard core SBC version.

 

All the posts I have made lately in this thread comparing the CSB with the NIV very significant. Those passages are fundamental in understanding the roles of men and women -- husbands and wives. If someone would like to prove from those passages that the NIV is somehow promoting feminism and blurring the line between men and women is clearly lying.

 

I find it kind of interesting that Holman and Lifeway had a kitty cat when the NIV 2011 was announcing it was going more gender neutral and this CSB has done the same with 'brothers and sisters" and other neutral wording. I think the only safe version out there is the AV. Although I do not see any gender tampering anytime soon with the NASB. I wouldn't be to surprised though if the ESV does though since they are gaining more readers and the fact they are already in the translation footnotes.

 

What verse has the CSB gone "gender neutral" for the sake of appeasing some group or agenda as opposed to becoming more gender accurate, which was the intent?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

Good Morning. I'm heading out the door this morning, but if you have a copy of them both I would take time to compare. I said what I did about Holman and Lifeway because both profusely stated they would not cave due to political correctness. If you read Holman's translation page it states "people having agendas" or something to that effect to make gender neutral language. I do not believe it had anything to do with being gender accurate or they would have updated way before this. I'm all for accuracy as long as that is the intention.

 

I have a digital copy of the CSB and a couple paper copies of the HCSB. You accused the CSB of Gender tampering. The responsibility to provide evidence would be on you, since you have made the "gender tampering" charge. Many have read articles online that claim such,and repaeated those claims. But know one has given specific evidence of the CSB gender tampering. Only thing seen so far is the CSB becoming nore gender accurate and reflecting who the words were originally spoken to and/or about.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

All of the above applies to the NIV and people such as Y1 who make unfounded, sinful accusations against it.

 

I still remember Albert Mohler famously stating "this is an important thing for Southern Baptists to do — if for no other reason than that we will have a major translation we can control." People have short memories, apparently. Doesn't seem like much control here.

 

Can you demonstrate the error in the CSB for us to see? Where do they commit "gender tampering"?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

Compare Bible Translations - CSB

 

Is that link supposed to show where the CSB goes to far with gender language....goes towards "gender tampering "?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

 

Apparently he is just blowing smoke - throwing out accusations that he is unwilling to defend or prove.

Sent from my SM-S120VL using Tapatalk

 

Y1 has been making false allegations against the NIV for nearly 84 months. He does not believe in truth-telling.
He doesn't have it in him to document any of the lies he spews. He can't back up false charges anyway. Whether it's the NIV or CSB he will continue down his sad path never repenting of his ways.

 

Its to show that where the Niv and Csb have their differences, the Csb had the better renderings.

 

You quoted TC's request as to where the CSB went "too far" with respect to inclusive language.There is no evidence in your link to back up your charge whatsoever.

You still haven't proven your false claims that the HCSB,ESV and NIV have "gone too far."

All of your posts that contain your lies about these various versions are mounting up to volumes of books that would fill a library.

 

So Fr Grudem, Dr Moehler, and all of the Lutherans are all wrong?