1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dispensationalism - yea or nay.

Discussion in 'Other Discussions' started by Wesley Briggman, Sep 11, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    John of Japan would be the person to ask. He teaches the subject at the college he is part of.
     
  2. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don't think that Scofield/Darby are wrong until they advocate the pre-tribulation rapture. The Blessed Hope is that Jesus will rescue us from the false prophet, the beast, and the Anti-Christ and bring to an end the great tribulation. The second advent, taught historically.
     
  3. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I was pre-trib for many years and in fact I still entertain the thought but I'm not so sure anymore.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I never was taught it so I never signed on to it. Almost 100 years ago Canadian Pastor Oswald J. Smith wrote a short comment on the question:

    htts://www.trumpetsounds.net/library/the-rapture/
     
  5. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This could turn into an essay if I'm not careful, but I'll try to be brief. :Coffee There is actually not a whole lot of differences between the two.

    Classic dispensationalism (Scofield, Chafer, etc.) defined a dispensation as an age, but the revised version (Ryrie, Pentecost, etc.) defines it as "a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God's purpose" (Dispensationalism, by Ryrie, p. 35). In other words, a dispensation is a task given to mankind by God, a way of running God's household.

    There are other detailed differences: the church age as a parenthesis (classical), a "dualistic purpose for redemption" (heaven & earth--Dispensationalism, by Michael J. Vlach, pp. 9-10; classical), etc. By the way the little book by Vlach is short and inexpensive, but an excellent intro to the theology.

    More to the point, hyper (ultra) dispensationalism and progressive dispensationalism are quite different from the classical/revised model. Hyper believes nothing before Acts is for us, among other things, and progressive is radically different, being a compromise with covenant theology.

    Clear as mud?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    For the covenant theology view, I've found Louis Berkhov's Systematic Theology to be helpful on the covenant side. He discusses the covenant of works beginning on p. 230 of the pdf, and the covenant of grace beginning on p. 288. (The hard copy version has different pagination.) You can find a pdf of it here: http://downloads.biblicaltraining.org/Systematic Theology by Louis Berkhof.pdf

    Important things to watch for: (1) covenant theologians use allegorical interpretation, and (2) they differ on the number (2 or 3?) and nature of the covenants.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    John, Which of these teachings do you see as correct?
     
  8. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My theology is revised dispensationalism.
     
  9. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Berkhof was a great teacher, but it's important to remember that he was a Presbyterian and a paedobaptist. As others have pointed out, there are significant differences between Baptist Covenant Theology and its Presby counterpart. As well as the 1689 Federalism site already mentioned, I recommend The Divine Covenants by A.W. Pink. It's available somewhere on line.
    BTW, JoJ, would you like to give an example of Berkhof's 'allegorical interpretations,' please? I'm interested to know what you regard as being allegorical.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I regard the application of OT prophecies to a nebulous, "invisible" or "universal" church as being allegorical or "spiritual" interpretation. Berkhov does this in "General Eschatology, 1. The Second Coming of Christ" (starting on p. 695 in the print edition). The literal interpretation of prophecies to Israel is a sine qua non of dispensationalism. One cannot be a dispensationalist and deny this. (So I don't consider the progressives to be true dispensationalists.)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thank you, JoJ :) Personally, whilst I see a universal Church very clearly in the N.T. as well as a spiritual Israel, I don't see either of your examples as being 'allegorical.' I would call seeing the Beast out of the Sea as being anti-Christian Gov't, and the Beast out of the Earth as being false religion as being allegorical (I agree with both of those :Cool).
    However, I'm not sure if this is the right thread to tackle these questions. I leave that up to you.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The word "Israel" occurs 11 times (twice in one verse) in Romans (all in 9-11), and every single time is clearly the nation Israel. So, I don't see how it can be other than allegorical when not interpreted literally, as the nation Israel, in the NT.

    Yeah, I'm not sure how far we can go in this direction and keep to the OP. :Coffee
     
  13. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    706
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I came from a Dispensationalist background having only ever been taught that. But what helped me the most was Romans 11. Paul says God removed the unbelievers from Israel. And will reattach any who believe. So, Jesus (Abraham's seed) and believers in him are Israel under the new covenant. And the broken off Jews are not. So in view of this, when Paul says “For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.” (2 Corinthians 1:20), it nullifies today's state of Israel's claim to the promises. And makes them just another nation of the world.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And that is in regards to who is part of the church. It in no way negates God's promises to be fulfilled to physical Israel in the future. Israel and the church are not the same.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    706
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus IS Israel along with those who believe in him. All the promises are Yes in Him. Today's state of Israel is just another secular nation with nothing in common with Biblical Israel except for their borrowed name.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Uh no His promises toward Israel are eternal
     
  17. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    706
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is true. But Israel IS Jesus and all related to him by faith. The church = the congregation of the Lord in the OT. Used over 300 times. Under the New Covenant, God removed all of the unbelievers from the congregation, leaving only believers in Christ (YHWH). In Romans 11, God will reunite any broken off from Israel through faith in Christ.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No Israel is Israel. Jesus is Jesus. Calling Jesus Israel is heresy not just a secondary issue. I suggest you be very careful on this board with such heresy. If you want to stick around that is.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    706
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus is Israel “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, And called my son out of Egypt.” (Hosea 11:1) compare to; “And (Jesus) was there (in Egypt) until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.” (Matthew 2:15)
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well I'm sure you won't be too shocked to discover that I don't believe that all those references to Israel are referring to the nation of Israel. If we take the very one you mentioned: 'For they are not all Israel who are of Israel' (Romans 9:8), we can see that not everyone who is a physical descendant of Israel (aka. Jacob) is an Israelite. This is in line with Romans 2:28-29 and Philippians 3:3.

    As it is written, 'I have reserved seven thousand in Israel, all whose knees have not bowed to Baal......' (1 Kings 19:18; Romans 11:4). Only a remnant of Physical Israel will be saved, and that by grace (Romans 9:15) through faith (Romans 11:5). The rest are not of Israel QED.

    Yet, 'And so all Israel will be saved' (Romans 11:11:26). 'All Israel' is the believing Jews plus the believing Gentiles. The 'middle wall of separation' has been broken down, 'that He [Christ] might reconcile them both [Jew and Gentile] to God in one body through the cross.......'(Ephesians 2:14-16). There is now only one people of God, and that's not 'replacement theology,' it's Inclusion Theology! 'For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call on Him. For "Whoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved"' (Romans 10:12-13; Joel 2:32).

    If that's allegory then I'll be an allegorizer and proud of it!
    Fair enough. Perhaps we can look at Revelation 13 on another thread.

    May I add that it's always a pleasure to discuss with you, John, however sharp our disagreements. You take the Scriptures seriously and that counts for a lot with me. I'm always happy to defer to your knowledge of the Biblical languages, though not always your interpretation of those languages. :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...