NY Times: Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father

We can love them but not support them, we can prosecute them, throw them in jail and still pray for them to know Christ (one day when their appetite for corruption and sin wains)

 

You mean like renigging on paying charity commitments to children’s cancer hospitals?

 

Right... they are advertising on amazon

https://www.amazon.com/Proof-Collusion-Trump-Betrayed-America/dp/1982116080

Maybe it will broaden your horizons

 

Dude, it's spelled reneging.

 

Funny you point that out. "Renigging" is actually a intentionally racist spelling of the word that is common in the south. Thus spelling is so commonly used that many people think it is the proper spelling.
Most common example. "Why did the basketball coach recruit? He was (improper spelling of the word)."

 

So, does this mean you are siding with Candace Owens regarding Christine Blasey Ford?
Candace Owens Calls for Jailing of Christine Blasey Ford: 'Lock Her Up'

 

Yeah, I thought the same, but according to Merriam-Webster, it is an acceptable alternate spelling of renege.

Definition of RENIG​

I do not doubt that some people use it that way when they think they can get away with it. I’ve never heard it, though, and have a hard time believing it is used that way in general settings. Have you ever seen it used in print or on air in this context? Any links? Without repercussions?

 

"Proof of Collusion: How Trump Betrayed America Hardcover – November 13, 2018"

...slated to come out AFTER the elections. If Dims fail to take control of the House I doubt if it will ever be published.

This is already out, #1 best seller, read the 1,241 customer reviews ,

The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump Hardcover – July 24, 2018

"#1 New York Times bestseller

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett reveals the real story behind Hillary Clinton’s deep state collaborators in government and exposes their nefarious actions during and after the 2016 election.

The Russia Hoax reveals how persons within the FBI and Barack Obama’s Justice Department worked improperly to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

When this suspected effort failed, those same people appear to have pursued a contrived investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.

The evidence suggests that partisans within the FBI and the Department of Justice, driven by personal animus and a misplaced sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously acted to subvert electoral democracy in our country.

The book will examine:

• How did Hillary Clinton manage to escape prosecution despite compelling evidence she violated the law?
• Did Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, and others obstruct justice by protecting Clinton?
• Why was there never a legitimate criminal investigation of Clinton in the Uranium One case?
• Are the text messages exchanged between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page evidence of a concerted effort to undermine the electoral process?
• Was there ever any real evidence of "collusion" between Trump and the Russians?
• Did Trump obstruct justice in the firing of Comey or was he legally exercising his constitutional authority?
• Did the FBI and DOJ improperly use a discredited "dossier" about Trump to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump associates?
• Should Mueller have disqualified himself under the special counsel law based on glaring conflicts of interest?
• Was fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn unfairly charged with making a false statement?

With insightful analysis and a fact-filled narrative, The Russia Hoax delves deeply into Democrat wrongdoing...."

 

What about this one? https://www.amazon.com/Proof-Trump-Russia-Collusion-Researched/dp/1548586994

Proof Of Trump Russia Collusion: All The Evidence Carefully Researched And Collected Into One Book Paperback – July 4, 2017

 

Truest book ever published. Filled with all the evidence of collusion.

 

That's the south..... they had the culture of slavery......I'm not from there, have no wish to be there, wont vacation there, and don't think like a cracker. Course I'm originally from Pennsylvania which sometimes resembles Kentucky (hence the name Pennsyltucky) but we are all just really coal crackers....Poles, Ukrainian's, Welsh, Germans, Italians, Slovaks, Irish, the labor force ya had to pay to go down the rat hole every day....and excuse me trump, ain't nobody doing well & the coal industry ain't king no more.

 

So, you are now calling us "crackers." I thought racial slurs were against board rules????? For the record, we don't miss you and are not in mourning because you don't grace us with your presence.

 

I should have pinpointed his taking money from Iran as well.

 

Calm down chief, nobody is calling you a cracker. If you took it that way, that's your problem.....one that I could care less about. BTW who is we........I take it your referring to southern people. that's OK, we don't want you up here either.

 

So, who were you calling a cracker? Due to the fact I am Native American, you have now racially insulted me by by calling me "chief." Honestly, considering the source, I don't care.

 

Who even reads these things?

 

I should have said that only a cracker would develop a word to purposely insult blacks......Those people are the Crackers.

OK, from now on I will call you "by by"

 

Thank you. Life will be much less annoying.

 

Guess again

 

Lol, this is what I mean:

Trump: No Plans To Fire Rod Rosenstein

"President Donald Trump told reporters he has no plans to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein during a planned conversation with him Monday aboard Air Force One.

“I get along very well with him,” Trump told reporters of Rosenstein while departing for a trip to Florida, adding that he does not plan to fire him...."

'Rosey' still has problems with congress though:

House Freedom Caucus To Rosenstein: Testify Or Resign