1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured How "No Creed but the Bible" Subverts the Bible

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Martin Marprelate, Feb 16, 2019.

  1. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    163
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Seems to miss the main point of distinction that Baptists historically have made between a "creed" (which tends to supersede the Bible) and a "confession" (which seeks to explain a faith-based interpretative stance by means of a general guideline for those affirming such).

    I worry more about an SBC seminary professor suggesting we should move more into heavy-handed creedalism than simply remaining united in our historically based confessional stance.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ziggy, did you read the article? it was the catch phrase for the Liberal and Modernists who took control of the Northern Baptist Convention and Seminaries.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Timothy George of Founders Ministries:

    Baptist Press • Dockery, George call for renewed study of Baptist history

    "George raised the question of whether Baptists are creedal people. He said Baptists have never advocated creedalism, in that they have always been ardent supporters of religious liberty and have never elevated any human-created statement above Scripture."

    "'Baptists have never canonized any of their confessions, but rather have held them all to be revisable in the light of the Bible, God’s infallible, unchanging revelation,' George said."

    "But a minority of Baptists has historically believed that creeds and confessions are useful statements of faith. 'Still, for all their value, confessions must be used with great wisdom and care,' George said. 'Confessionalism -- like creedalism and traditionalism -- can stultify and choke, as well as undergird and defend.'
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Perhaps it is a difference between the UK (where I live) and the USA, but to me a confession is nothing else an extended creed. Perhaps you will explain how your 'historically based confessional stance' (I would prefer it if it were 'Biblically based') differs from a creed. Does your confession not identify with the 'Apostles' Creed?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Subjectively speaking, the two can be synonymous. Functionally, confessions such as the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith, Westminster Confession of Faith, ad the Belgic Confession are more systematic in addressing specific points of doctrine. Creeds tend to be more narrow in scope. Then again, one person's creed is another person's confession and vice versa.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The problem with this is that Timothy George himself has sold the pass to some degree by his discussions and cooperations with the Church of Rome. I would say that he might be a good example of what happens when one abandons creeds and confessions.
    This is true, of course. The very first article of the 1689 Baptist Confession says, The Holy Scripture is the only sufficient, certain and infallible rule of all saving knowledge, faith and obedience' (1:1). If it can be shown that an article of a Creed or Confession is not according to Scripture, it must be altered or dumped.
    Anything can be misused, including the Bible itself, but the fault does not lie with Bible, confession or creed, but with the people who apply them.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Martin Marprelate, I see your pet obsession the Salters' Hall Synod is the focus of an entire conference at Oxford University next month:

    Centre for Baptist History & Heritage/Baptist Historical Society Conference on the Salters’ Hall Debates of 1719
    How exciting. Sounds like it's right up your alley. Will you be attending?
     
  9. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How fascinating! Of course the event was exactly 300 years ago, in 1719.
    I had not heard about the conference, and some of the speakers seem a bit suspect, but I'll consult my diary.
    Thanks for the heads up. :)

    For those who would like to know what on earth the Salters' Hall Synod was about, but who can't get to Oxford that particular day, read this:
    Learning The Lessons of History (1)
    Learning the Lessons of History (2)

    :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A point of history:

    As used by the Modernists\Liberals in the Nothern Baptist Convention, it referred to the push by conservatives to require missionaries and others getting Convention funding to agree to the New Hampshire Confession.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think the main issue here is that we still have agreement that only the scriptures are inspired and infallible to us for all doctrines and theology, but that the Confessions would be really good summary statements of what the scriptures hold with as being true.
     
  12. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think the issue is regarding if Confessions of faith such as 1689 one means denying sola scriptura, and your articles point and mine would be that they do not!
     
  13. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you believe Jesus "descended into Hell"?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I read it and was not impressed. No creeds does not subvert the Bible. People with creeds and without creeds subvert the Bible.

    How ironic that 2 Tim. 3:16 is referred to in an article on creeds. The Bible does not encourage creeds. In fact Jesus spoke against the accretion of misguided tradition when He said "You have heard that it was said ... but I say unto you". And also He spoke of the "traditions of men that make the Word of God no effect". No, they were not called creeds, but they were quite similar.

    The creeds and the Church Fathers are what the Roman Catholic authorities flung in Luther's face when he had the novel, heretical (to them) schismatic teaching of justification by faith.

    No, we have the Word of God to guide us. If we leave that we quickly come on to shaky ground. Creeds and Confessions are mostly correct and they do have value for studying. But the Bible is totally correct. If we misapply it it is our fault.

    The creeds are mostly correct but in a few areas, like eschatology - or assumed eschatology - they are wide of the mark. Also their description of the nature of Christ and His kingdom.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,850
    Likes Received:
    1,084
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Both creeds and confessions set out beliefs. Technically, creed is often used to describe the so-called ecumenical confessions (Apostles, Nicene or Nicene-Constantinopolitan, Chalcedonian, and Athanasian) that outline essential orthodoxy and confession usually refers to a statement of faith of a movement or denomination.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Campbell would be part of that no creed movement. People following him did not know what they believed or why they believed it. The teaching of doctrine, the defense of the faith and giving everyman an answer, fell into decline in the nineteenth century "to avoid division", commensurate with the rise of the cults. The SBC has the Faith and Message to meet that need. They wisely finesse a strict eschatology and the rape and incest questions of abortion. Now if they can just stand against the heresy that homosexuality is natural as well as the heresy that Islam is something other than demonic.
     
  17. Rob_BW

    Rob_BW Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    4,320
    Likes Received:
    1,242
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Informative as always, Martin. I've been reading a bit lately on the creep of Unitarianism.
     
  18. MartyF

    MartyF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2018
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    194
    Faith:
    Baptist
    He has a number of problems. First, he lists only "particular" creeds which shows his slant on things. The author is trying to push Calvanism and eject any belief that runs counter to that. He is unable to do that with the Bible, so he is using a creed to try to do it.

    Second, there is a reason why many avoid creeds.

    First, words get redefined, created, or simply divorced from their original meaning. Regenerate does not carry the same meaning to me and born-again or obtaining a new heart. My definition of grace doesn't agree with that of the New Hampshire or London confessions. I believe in predestination too, but my definition for the word is completely different. With the bible, I can see a clear context to the meaning of the words. With a creed, I have no context. The creed is basically meaningless. This is why many say we may use the same words, but we use different dictionaries.

    Second, once you announce your creed, it is very hard to go back on that creed. The creed literally becomes an addendum of the Bible people will fight to defend fiercely for. One local church has the Rapture in the creed. (Another word not in the Bible.) Now they will as fiercely defend their belief in the Rapture as the death and resurrection of Jesus.

    Third, formal statements of religious beliefs have denounced believer's baptism for a millennium. Should there be any other reason why Baptists should avoid creeds? These statements of religious belief have fought against and still fight against one of the cornerstones of what it means to be Baptist - believer's baptism. Lutherans, Presbyterians, Methodists, Anglicans, Catholics, Orthodox, etc. all support infant as oppose to believer's baptism. All of the founders of Baptist churches rejected the creeds of the churches of which they were originally members.

    Only scripture was also the battle-cry of the founding Baptists. It's how Baptists got started.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  19. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No I do not. I think that particular part is based on a faulty understanding of Ephesians 4:9 and 1 Peter 3:19. When my church recites this creed we use a more modern version of it which speaks of our Lord as 'descending into the place of the dead' (i.e. the tomb) from which he arose on the third day. This is in line with what I wrote in post #9.
    However, the Apostles' Creed (not written by the Apostles, but quite ancient) is extremely helpful. It sets out the deity of our Lord, His incarnation, humiliation, passion, resurrection and personal return in glory at the end of the age. It is good for congregations to be reminded of these basic truths from time to time.

    I understand that you may not like Creeds and Confessions. They were written to protect churches from those who would undermine the basic doctrines of the Faith (2 Thessalonians 2:1-2; 2 Timothy 4:2-3; Jude 3-4).

    Jeremiah 6:14. 'This is what the LORD says: "Stand at the crossroads and look; ask for the ancient paths, ask where the good way is, and walk in it, and you will find rest for your souls." But you said, "We will not walk in it."'
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That verse is not referring to anything outside of God's Word. The context shows that the ancient paths are God's Word. See vss. 10 and 19.

    I see what you did. You describe your creed as 'ancient'. Then you quote this verse as it has anything to do with my aversion to creeds.

    This is what creedalists do. 1. They promote creeds and confessions to the point where they crowd out Scripture - if not surpass It altogether.

    2. They eisegete passages in order to justify their inordinate respect for what is basically the traditions of men
     
    #20 asterisktom, Feb 17, 2019
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2019
    • Winner Winner x 1
Loading...