1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured John 3:16-18

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by SavedByGrace, Jan 24, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I suggest that you take a look at Acts 2.47 in the KJV and then in the Greek and then tell me that their translation is not biased and completely wrong
     
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So 1769 Kjv, which improved the perfect 1611 Kjv?
     
  3. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How so? (granted this is off topic)
     
  4. Dave G

    Dave G Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2018
    Messages:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    1,333
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I figure that 53 men, give or take ( many of whom were fluent in Koine Greek ),
    spent 7 years agonizing over whether or not the English was correct, then I doubt I'll find anything substantially wrong with it.;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    they were not infallible though, nor inspired!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Also true, but @SavedByGrace is just giving a shot in the dark. He should tell us what he perceives the error to be rather then sending everyone else on a goose chase.
     
  7. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Do you understand Greek? Because there is no doubt that it cannot read as it does in the KJV
    Check other versions
     
  8. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why not just tell us this supposed error?
     
  9. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My guess is that @SavedByGrace issue with Acts 2:47 in the KJV is the use of the word should which only shows he does not know the English language if that be the case.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  10. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Dr A T Robertson

    Those that were being saved (tou swzomenou). Present passive participle. Probably for repetition like the imperfect prosetiqei. Better translate it "those saved from time to time." It was a continuous revival, day by day. Swzw like swthria is used for "save" in three senses (beginning, process, conclusion), but here repetition is clearly the point of the present tense.
     
  11. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Acts 2:47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.

    That verse is perfect as it is. I can't doubt the word of God just because the verse is misused to teach heresy.
     
  12. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'd still like to know what in the world he thinks the issue is with the verse.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Acts 2:47
    [47]Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. KJV

    Acts 2:47
    [47]praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved. NASB
     
  14. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is literally no difference in meaning in those two translations. Not even a little.
     
  15. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Guess finding fault with the Lord being the One to add daily to the church, not the free will decisions of lost sinners now to get saved!
     
  16. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was the work of the Lord directly Himself either passage!
     
  17. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    1,158
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Except Esau ...

    [Mal 1:3 NASB] 3 but I have hated Esau, and I have made his mountains a desolation and [appointed] his inheritance for the jackals of the wilderness."
    [Rom 9:13 NASB] 13 Just as it is written, "JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED."

    [Mal 1:3 YLT] 3 Is not Esau Jacob's brother? -- an affirmation of Jehovah, And I love Jacob, and Esau I have hated, And I make his mountains a desolation, And his inheritance for dragons of a wilderness.
    [Rom 9:13 YLT] 13 according as it hath been written, 'Jacob I did love, and Esau I did hate.'

    [Mal 1:3 DBY] 3 and I hated Esau; and made his mountains a desolation, and [gave] his inheritance to the jackals of the wilderness.
    [Rom 9:13 DBY] 13 according as it is written, I have loved Jacob, and I have hated Esau.

    [Mal 1:3 WEB] 3 And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.
    [Rom 9:13 WEB] 13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.​

    (You seemed to think Young, Darby and Webster were important translations.)

    For those into the original language, the word in Malachi is H8130 שָׂנֵא sânêʼ, saw-nay'; a primitive root; to hate (personally) and the word in Romans is G3404 μισέω miséō, mis-eh'-o; from a primary μῖσος mîsos (hatred); to detest (especially to persecute).
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yeah I am really scratching my head on what @SavedByGrace thinks the problem is here.
     
  19. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    441
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is not finding any fault with the Bible but with the KJV using its theological bias in their rendering of the Greek, which is not what the Greek says
     
  20. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What do you think the problem is? There is literally no difference between the KJV and NASB other than updated language.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...