1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Age of Accountability

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by mojoala, May 12, 2006.

  1. Me4Him

    Me4Him New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Like a lot of people you blame your sins on the flesh, but the flesh only "tempts" you to sin, the sin actually occur when you conscientiously give in to that lust, that's when your spirit (soul) sins.

    The flesh will never repent of it's sins, even after you're saved, the flesh will still continue to tempt you, but as long as the soul doesn't surrender to the lust, it won't sin.

    One sin make you a sinner, and that sin can be nothing more than an evil thought.

    So does being born in a body of sin, make you a sinner, or surrendering to the lust of that body??

    Would the spirit (soul) be pure until it committed that first sins, if it wasn't pure, then both Body and soul would have an appointment with death from birth, that's the law, death of the flesh first, then a "Second death" of the soul at the GWT, in this case, neither could be save, when God makes an appointment, it's kept, period, that why the appointment is only "ONCE" for man to die. (flesh/body)

    The law requires death for sin, and since the soul isn't condemned from birth, it has no sin at birth, else you would have a violation of the law.


    Nope, getting you out it. :D :D [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: They go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies.

    The soul, the person--body, soul and spirit, is condemned from birth. As soon as they be born they go forth speaking lies.
    Don't argue with me on this point. Your argument is with God. He stated it.
    The fact is we are born sinners. We are born with a sin nature. Thus the necessity of being born again, being born into God's family.
    DHK
     
  3. Helen

    Helen <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Likes Received:
    2
    The fact is, sir, that ALL sin was atoned for by Christ on the cross. Therefore the argument about the 'ability' of an infant to sin is moot. They are covered by Christ's blood as their sins are unintended/unintentional and the unthinking result of a sin nature ... if, indeed, it can be argued that infants sin (which I think Paul would disagree with, cf Romans 7:7-11 and on).

    Thus we are no longer under condemnation because of sin, for that condemnation was taken by Christ Himself out of love for us. Our condemnation is because of unbelief.

    Therefore, unless one is willing to say that an infant can deny Christ, that infant is not condemned. Indeed, as Christ as said, their angels always see the face of the Father in Heaven. And, heaven belongs to such as these.

    It is not a matter of there being an age of accountability. Of course there is. The argument would be about when it is.
     
  4. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  5. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree Helen and that is a pretty hard question. I think it depends on the person themselves for some mature much faster than others and then there are those who never fully develop in this life but thanks to God they will in the next.

    Blessings,

    BBob
     
  6. timothy27

    timothy27 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Helen if ALL sin is atoned for then there would never be need to repent, because we are covered by Christs blood. Using this I could argue that I am not accountable until I want to be accountable. But then according to you I have nothing to be accountable for because Christ took away ALL my sin. So if as you say the argument is about when the age of acountabilty would be, my question is why is Christ's blood powerful enough to cover my sins in infancy but not when I reach the mythical age of accountability.
     
  7. Gwyneth

    Gwyneth <img src=/gwyneth.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    When we have heard , and have understood the message of the Gospel - and still refuse to accept The Lord Jesus as our saviour - it is then that we are accountable .
    We will still sin, because of our sinful nature,but we will have heard and understood the Gospel. It is then that we should ask forgiveness and repent. We are accountable when we understand what we are to be accountable for. There will still be sin that we will commit that we do not realise is sin, and we should ask God for forgiveness for our lack of understanding, and ask for His help to understand more fully.

    [ May 24, 2006, 10:04 PM: Message edited by: Gwyneth ]
     
  8. Me4Him

    Me4Him New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jesus did in fact die for the sins of the whole world.

    1Jo 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

    But note what the following verse says.

    Joh 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

    If Jesus die for the sins of the whole world, then why is the "Might be" inserted in that verse, doesn't that exclude an "Automatic remission of sins"??

    If Jesus's death only brings man to the point that he "might be" saved, what's the final ingredent to change the might be into a "will be" saved, FAITH????

    Faith won't pay the wages of sin, that's why without Jesus there is no "might be".

    Just as Abraham's Faith in God was tried before righteousness was imputed to him, so is every one else, the plan has not changed,

    Heb 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried,

    Ga 3:6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.

    this is why Jesus can die for the sins of the whole world, that the whole world "MIGHT BE" saved, but any lacking "FAITH" in Jesus "WILL NOT" have his righteousness imputed to them.

    Ro 9:31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.

    32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith,

    And like Abraham, every person must decide whether to believe or not, God calls, but he doesn't force, few believe, few are chosen to be saved.
     
  9. timothy27

    timothy27 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    So what happens to all the people in third world countries that never have the opportunity to hear about Christ, are they saved too? Are they not accountable for their sins? Paul says in Romans 1

    18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

    We have no excuse for our sins, and definitely do not have a "Sin for free until your twenty-three" card.
     
  10. Me4Him

    Me4Him New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Between those who have the law, and those who by nature, obey the law, and those who knew little being beating with few stripes compared to those who knew much, and God judging the "heart" rather than what we see/believe,

    I'd say it will be a Judgment/Justice based on "knowledge" far greater than man is able to comprehend.

    I'm glad I don't have to Judge them, and I wouldn't recommend it for anyone else either.
     
  11. mojoala

    mojoala New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gen. 17:12, Lev. 12:3 - these texts show the circumcision of eight-day old babies as the way of entering into the Old Covenant -

    Col 2:11-12 - however, baptism is the new "circumcision" for all people of the New Covenant. Therefore, baptism is for babies as well as adults. God did not make His new Covenant narrower than the old Covenant. To the contrary, He made it wider, for both Jews and Gentiles, infants and adults.


    Job 14:1-4 - man that is born of woman is full of trouble and unclean. Baptism is required for all human beings because of our sinful human nature.

    Psalm 51:5 - we are conceived in the iniquity of sin. This shows the necessity of baptism from conception.

    Matt. 18:2-5 - Jesus says unless we become like children, we cannot enter into heaven. So why would children be excluded from baptism?

    Matt 19:14 - Jesus clearly says the kingdom of heaven also belongs to children. There is no age limit on entering the kingdom, and no age limit for being eligible for baptism.

    Mark 10:14 - Jesus says to let the children come to Him for the kingdom of God also belongs to them. Jesus says nothing about being too young to come into the kingdom of God.

    Mark 16:16 - Jesus says to the crowd, "He who believes and is baptized will be saved." But in reference to the same people, Jesus immediately follows with "He who does not believe will be condemned." This demonstrates that one can be baptized and still not be a believer. This disproves the argument that one must be a believer to be baptized. There is nothing in the Bible about a "believer's baptism."

    Luke 18:15 – Jesus says, “Let the children come to me.” The people brought infants to Jesus that he might touch them. This demonstrates that the receipt of grace is not dependent upon the age of reason.

    Acts 2:38 - Peter says to the multitude, "Repent and be baptized.." Protestants use this verse to prove one must be a believer (not an infant) to be baptized. But the Greek translation literally says, "If you repent, then each one who is a part of you and yours must each be baptized” (“Metanoesate kai bapistheto hekastos hymon.”) This, contrary to what is argued, actually proves that babies are baptized based on their parents’ faith. This is confirmed in the next verse.

    Acts 2:39 - Peter then says baptism is specifically given to children as well as adults. “Those far off” refers to those who were at their “homes” (primarily infants and children). God's covenant family includes children. The word "children" that Peter used comes from the Greek word "teknon" which also includes infants.

    Luke 1:59 - this proves that "teknon" includes infants. Here, John as a "teknon" (infant) was circumcised. See also Acts 21:21 which uses “teknon” for eight-day old babies. So baptism is for infants as well as adults.

    Acts 10:47-48 - Peter baptized the entire house of Cornelius, which generally included infants and young children. There is not one word in Scripture about baptism being limited to adults.

    Acts 16:15 - Paul baptized Lydia and her entire household. The word "household" comes from the Greek word "oikos" which is a household that includes infants and children.

    Acts 16:15 - further, Paul baptizes the household based on Lydia's faith, not the faith of the members of the household. This demonstrates that parents can present their children for baptism based on the parents' faith, not the children's faith.

    Acts 16:30-33 - it was only the adults who were candidates for baptism that had to profess a belief in Jesus. This is consistent with the Church's practice of instructing catechumens before baptism. But this verse does not support a "believer's baptism" requirement for everyone. See Acts 16:15,33. The earlier one comes to baptism, the better. For those who come to baptism as adults, the Church has always required them to profess their belief in Christ. For babies who come to baptism, the Church has always required the parents to profess the belief in Christ on behalf of the baby. But there is nothing in the Scriptures about a requirement for ALL baptism candidates to profess their own belief in Christ.

    Acts 16:33 - Paul baptized the jailer (an adult) and his entire household (which had to include children). Baptism is never limited to adults and those of the age of reason. See also Luke 19:9; John 4:53; Acts 11:14; 1 Cor. 1:16; and 1 Tim. 3:12; Gen. 31:41; 36:6; 41:51; Joshua 24:15; 2 Sam. 7:11, 1 Chron. 10:6 which shows “oikos” generally includes children.

    Rom. 5:12 - sin came through Adam and death through sin. Babies' souls are affected by Adam's sin and need baptism just like adult souls.

    Rom. 5:15 - the grace of Jesus Christ surpasses that of the Old Covenant. So children can also enter the new Covenant in baptism. From a Jewish perspective, it would have been unthinkable to exclude infants and children from God's Covenant kingdom.

    1 Cor. 1:16 - Paul baptized the household ("oikos") of Stephanus. Baptism is not limited to adults.

    Eph. 1:1; Col. 1:2 - Paul addresses the "saints" of the Church, and these include the children he addresses in

    Eph. 6:1 and Col. 3:20. Children become saints of the Church only through baptism.

    Eph. 2:3 - we are all by nature children of wrath, in sin, like all mankind. Infants are no exception. See also Psalm 51:5 and Job 14:1-4 which teach us we are conceived in sin and born unclean.

    2 Thess. 3:10 - if anyone does not work let him not eat. But this implies that those who are unable to work should still be able to eat. Babies should not starve because they are unable to work, and should also not be denied baptism because they are unable to make a declaration of faith.

    Matt. 9:2; Mark 2:3-5 - the faith of those who brought in the paralytic cured the paralytic's sins. This is an example of the forgiveness of sins based on another's faith, just like infant baptism. The infant child is forgiven of sin based on the parents' faith.

    Matt. 8:5-13 - the servant is healed based upon the centurion's faith. This is another example of healing based on another's faith. If Jesus can heal us based on someone else’s faith, then He can baptize us based on someone else’s faith as well.

    Mark 9:22-25 - Jesus exercises the child's unclean spirit based on the father's faith. This healing is again based on another's faith.

    1 Cor. 7:14 – Paul says that children are sanctified by God through the belief of only one of their parents.

    Exodus 12:24-28 - the Passover was based on the parent's faith. If they did not kill and eat the lamb, their first-born child died.

    Joshua 5:2-7 - God punished Israel because the people had not circumcised their children. This was based on the parent's faith. The parents play a critical role in their child's salvation.
     
    #51 mojoala, Jun 1, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 1, 2006
  12. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Acts 2:39 - Peter then says baptism is specifically given to children as well as adults. “Those far off” refers to those who were at their “homes” (primarily infants and children). God's covenant family includes children. The word "children" that Peter used comes from the Greek word "teknon" which also includes infants.

    (How do you get out of that it meant the children at home ) :confused: :confused:

    38: Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
    39: For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.

    (I have 3 children they are 40, 41 and 42, think it might of meant mine?)

    Need I go on!!
     
    #52 Brother Bob, Jun 1, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 1, 2006
  13. mojoala

    mojoala New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay then let's go back to the Old testament:

    Infant Circumcision eliminated the need for the child to hear/believe the Scriptures, or personal trust/faith in GOD, and that's a choice each individual must make, not Mommy, Not Daddy, Not God, but "YOU
     
  14. whatever

    whatever New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,088
    Likes Received:
    1
    So our sins are covered but our unbelief is not? And we are not accountable unless and until we have heard and understood and rejected the gospel?

    And people say that Calvinism is built on human logic. Sheesh.
     
  15. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    No kidding.


    Then know one in lost jungles will go to hell since they never heard or understood the gospel.
    For that matter, many americans won't go to hell because they never heard the gospel.
    I got it! Let's stop preaching the gospel so we won't have to make people reject and thus go to hell!
     
  16. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Care to back that up with the Bible rather than emotion?
     
  17. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Again, lets not tell people they are sinners and what sin is so that they won't go to hell.
     
  18. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    MOre emotion and nothing to back it up.

    BB, please use the Bible and not your emotions to make your points.
    What part of "born dead in tresspasses and sins" do you not understand?
     
  19. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did you just make that up or what? I would rather you use your emotions than make something up!!
     
  20. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    I apologize, I was away from my Bible when I posted that one.
    I got two verses mixed up:

    Eph 2:1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
    And
    Ps 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

    We inherit a sin nature and are even after birth even until the time of salvation.

    There is never an age of "innocence"

    Eph 2:1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

    Eph 2:5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)


    We are conceived in sin and we are dead until we are regenerated or "quickened" so what is the point where we first die? I don't see the distinction
     
Loading...