John Kerry Sued By POW Group

If they were not lying, then the suit is not laughable and they were defamed. If they were lying, then Sherwood should recoup his money. In the meanwhile, he is using these suits as fundraising points, probably successfully.

Sure, it's possible, but I don't know how likely as they are not his minions.

What nonsense! Sherwood and this incarnation of the Swift Vets could stop it if they chose.

Perhaps, I don't know.

 

It's not so much that they were used as how they were used.

Dr. Campbell's suit doesn't mention any pictures taken from "The New Soldier".

NewsMax was also a defendant in Bjornson's suit. Were they reporting on the SwiftVet thing while an interested party?

 

I agree with Joseph. Have Kerry countersue and sign the form. Let's get the truth.

 

How convenient.</font>[/QUOTE]Say what? How is it "convenient" that Dr. Campbell's suit doesn't mention the pictures you implied were at the heart of his suit?

If he is recognisable in the clip(s) of him, while the narration accuses the soldiers of fraud with the implication that that refers to the soldiers shown at and around that moment, then he may have a case against Sherwood et al, but none against Kerry as you had advised.

Dr. Bjornson's picture is used.

Yeah, right. Wonder away.

My point. They paid to have it shown at the same time as they were covering the story? Isn't that crossing the line?

Kerry's campaign rightly pointed out that broadcasting it for free, uninterrupted just before the election would be a significant and material contribution to the opposition.

 

How come draft dodger Bush gets a pass? I spent eight years in. My daddy couldn't get me a pass.

 

He's not a draft dodger, Brother James. I don't know what the name is for what he did, but it is not "draft dodger". He may not have served in Vietnam, but he did join the Texas National Guard (cutting ahead of 200 or so men in line) and serve on a political campaign, so no dissing the prez.

 

Both Bush AND Kerry served, and AFAIK, got honorable discharges. That's where it begins, and ends, for me.

 

Having served in Veit Nam the very mention of John Kerry turns my stomic. I well remember arriving at the San Fransico air Port and having to pass through a type of dog run to board our buses. On the other side of the fence were hundreds of kerry & Fondas pals spitting on us and calling us all baby killers & murderers. I am so thankful that the good Lord saw fit to prevent him from becoming commander and chief.

 

Which is yet another problem I have with the current president. Let's not forget that last year, one of the main proponets of silencing freedom of speech for the Swift Vets and Vietnam POW's was none other than George W. Bush.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Playing politics against freedom of speech and Vietnam Vets and POW's doesn't seem logical. He could have just kept his mouth shut althogether and stayed above the fray. Or, he could have said that they don't represent him and his POV if he thought they were wrong. But, he crossed the line when he encouraged silencing them.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Page-3 warning: This thread will be closed no sooner than 4:30 a.m. ET by one of the Moderators.

Lady Eagle,
Moderator

 

She's a bit of an idjit.

She should know.

She seems to indulge her own self in this diatribe.

No one is stopping her from proclaiming truth, fiction & hyperbole....what in the world is she on about?

 

Closed.