1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search Results for Query: "Luke 2:14"

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 2, 14
Search Again
  1. TCassidy
    Post

    Do you believe in the scriptures being Infallable?

    And what does this have to do with my belief that the Byzantine Textform is superior? I believe δοξα εν υψιστοις θεω και επι γης ειρηνη εν...
    Post by: TCassidy, Sep 5, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  2. Revmitchell
    Post

    Do you believe in the scriptures being Infallable?

    I am no fan of the NIV but you need to understand your posts on this subject are foolish. You are treating the english translations as if they are...
    Post by: Revmitchell, Sep 5, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  3. Jordan Kurecki
    Post

    Do you believe in the scriptures being Infallable?

    Luke 2:14 KJB, NKJV - "on earth peace, GOOD WILL TOWARD MEN." NASB, RSV, ESV, NET - "on earth peace AMONG THOSE WITH WHOM HE IS PLEASED." NIV,...
    Post by: Jordan Kurecki, Sep 5, 2016 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  4. Van
    Post

    Why the ESV Falters

    Lets consider Luke 2:14, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!" (ESV). The coming of Christ...
    Post by: Van, Aug 24, 2016 in forum: Bible Versions & Translations
  5. Logos1560
    Post

    facts from 1804 Oxford KJV edition

    In this post, there is a summary of my comparison of the present-day Oxford KJV edition in the Scofield Reference Bible with an edition printed in...
    Post by: Logos1560, Jan 19, 2006 in forum: Bible Versions & Translations
  6. TexasSky
    Post

    Christians and violence

    I hate sin - That question you attribute to me is actually my quoting someone else's question. I also believe that Christ means for us to love...
    Post by: TexasSky, Aug 1, 2005 in forum: Polls Forum
  7. Sola_Scriptura
    Post

    Bible Translations

    You also demonstrate ignorance of the 2nd century church father Tertullian whose quotes reflect the underlying AV text. Here are some more church...
    Post by: Sola_Scriptura, Oct 28, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  8. Michael Hobbs
    Post

    NIV problem, part II

    Sure, if you can show me an example of where the KJV translators added non-italicized words to a verse. Wait a sec, is that fair? The big...
    Post by: Michael Hobbs, Oct 22, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  9. Johnv
    Post

    Mellowing out on the KJV

    If I'm not mistaken Johnv, there has not been one contradiction proven in the KJB. Here's a list of translation errors: Genesis 1:2 should read...
    Post by: Johnv, May 15, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  10. Faith Fact Feeling
    Post

    Perfect Bible

    Scott, You said: “Erasmus, uninspired and probably unsaved, took less than 10 imperfect mss and recreated the perfect original?”. This is...
    Post by: Faith Fact Feeling, Apr 22, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  11. HankD
    Post

    The phrase “believe the KJV is true”

    Thank You Chick, I too see a value for the Alexandrian type text. Even the Old Itala will agree with them on occasion (as they do with Luke...
    Post by: HankD, Apr 10, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  12. Chick Daniels
    Post

    The phrase “believe the KJV is true”

    Hi Hank, I appreciate your tone of brotherly love in this discussion. Regarding ‘sheer numerics’, I do disagree as to the value of numbers in...
    Post by: Chick Daniels, Apr 10, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  13. HankD
    Post

    The phrase “believe the KJV is true”

    To sum up, I believe my point is proven that in the face of sheer numerics the Traditional text greatly outweighs the WH reading of Luke 2:14...
    Post by: HankD, Apr 10, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  14. HankD
    Post

    The phrase “believe the KJV is true”

    Luke 2:14 Traditional Text Evidences Aleph - Corrector of the manuscript B - Three successive corrections K L P Delta Theta Xi Psi 053 f1...
    Post by: HankD, Apr 9, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  15. Chick Daniels
    Post

    The phrase “believe the KJV is true”

    What is 'Skewed' about it? Again, I have stated that textual critics are not W&H followers, no more than the engineers at Ford Motors get their...
    Post by: Chick Daniels, Apr 9, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  16. HankD
    Post

    The phrase “believe the KJV is true”

    Dear CD, "representative doctrine" or the W&H legacy... The Wescott and Hort legacy can be seen in Bibles which note certain passages and give...
    Post by: HankD, Apr 9, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  17. Johnv
    Post

    The "original" Autographs

    The KJV translators altered the doctrine in Daniel 3:25 to imply a reference to Jesus, when that reference is absent from the Hebrew text used by...
    Post by: Johnv, Mar 6, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  18. Johnv
    Post

    KJVO Walked Out on Me!

    Genesis 1:2 should read "And the earth became without form..." The word translated "was" is hayah, and denotes a condition different than a former...
    Post by: Johnv, Feb 18, 2003 in forum: 2003 Archive
  19. Chris Temple
    Post

    Mark 16:9-20

    I believe the section is canonical, although it may not be Markan. Schaff says this: See http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/hcc1/htm/i.XII.81.htm
    Post by: Chris Temple, May 27, 2002 in forum: 2000-02 Archive
Showing results 1 to 19 of 19
Search Again