#2: Why so much against KJB-only?

Be angry and sin not.

 

Why not be more correct and state that your god is limited to what your finite mind can understand and comprehend, per your own statements in the past?

 

No matter how heated the disagreement may get, I really don't see any reason to blaspheme God! God is neither limited nor "tenny-tiny."

 

If Robocop3
does that, than you
have to admit your tenny-tiny God
can only preserve His inerrant written
word in one and only one Book.
Robocop3's God can preserve His
inerrant written word in mulitple
places, just in the English language, let
alone many more in many more languages.

WOW! What a God that Robocop3 has!

God is bigger than the one version man
Bigger than Godzilla and the monsers on TV
God is bigger than the one version man
And He watches over you and me.

(with apoligies to certain unnamed
but implied veggies ) </font>[/QUOTE]Silly silly Ed. Man oh man are you cracking me up with your goofiness tonight.

First I like how you refer to Cranston (robycop) as "robocop", kinda makes it souond like he has been programmed by some man to act as he does, just like all other robos or robots.

Second, the difference between my god and Cranston's god is that my God is not limited to my finite mind. My God is Almighty and His way are not my ways, nor His thoughts, my thoughts. Cranston's god is limited to whatever it is that Cranston can understand with his finite mind, making his god's thoughts the same as his and his god's ways also the same as his.

The difference, my God is the God of the Bible, while Cranston's is someone else.

Another difference, Cranston's god is the author of and loves confusion and division among his people, which is why ke keeps seeing to it that there are a steady stream of new and conflictings bibles coming out, seemingly each year releasing another new one that is supposed to be the most accurate, yet still keeping all the older less accurate ones in the market also. Talk about a small god you mv "defenders" have. Why you would want such a god is beyond me.

You seem to have some knowledge of my God, and thats a good start. Hopefully you will progress and actually get to know Him.


Jim

 

"Hopefully you will progress and actually get to know Him."

Ed, I respectfully extend to you my apologies for this above comment. It was fully uncalled for and I should not have posted it.


Jim

 

Scott,
We will just disagree on the readability of the KJV. We neither want to budge, and so lets end that part of the conversation.
What you said about lost people going away lost because of the Spirit not giving them light, I agree with. I am glad we agree there. As the song says, "All is vain unless the Spirit of the Holy One comes down."
God's grace to you.

Roby,

I am sincere in saying I will not take the time to read all that stuff. But it is probably true that most of the reading material on the subject is pro-mvs, which mirrors the apparent majority of mv-pro people on this board. Plus, there are many new versions, and only one KJV, the mvs have a conspiracy I think. Dont worry to much ,Lord willing, I will be attending Pensecola Christian College in(or just after) August. So I will be hearing much about the versions debate at first at least. The only problem you would see with this is they support only the KJV.
The difference is Luke was speaking as he was moved by the Holy Ghost, Mary was speaking in and of herself.
Actually, I think the KJV has done Japanese people good. I am sure that at least some of the missionaries to Japan in the past and present and probably in the future have and will be saved from the KJV.
Please, produce proof than that the mvs are ok. And that using the KJV exclusively is wrong.
I am still enjoying the conversation(dialogue).

I hope we are all saved and know the same God.
We might not, but I hope so.

Bor. Ed,
I do not think it is limiting God to say the KJV is His complete, inspired, and inerrant Word in English.(And mvs are not) It is just disagreeing with mvs. No one said God cant, only that God has not, and will not.

 

I agree with you

Great!