32 ?!?

And you just added one more.
Gina

 

Yes, many of us do have other things to talk about, in addition to the movie.

You could probably have made an intelligent contribution to one of those many topics in the time you took to count the "Passion" threads, though.

 

Wow Jim, that was a really "passionate" reply!
Gina

 

We could start another thread on KJV-onlyism if you'd like.

 

Let's make it more complicated and ask free will KJVO's if they would read MacArthur's KJV study version.
Gina

 

Ya think? The underlying problem appears to be with some of the naysayers of the film. They won't settle for simply having people see it if they want to, and not seeing it if they don't. Indeed, it's the opponents of this film, not the proponents, that have made this movie a big deal. A few naysayers will go to extremes to get people not to see the film, to the point where they'll imply that people seeing and approving this film are of Satan, not of God.

It's the Bruce Almighty topic, all over again.

 

it's the Bruce Almighty thing on steroids....

 

Saucer of milk anyone?

 

33...

34...

35...

 

I don't see anything wrong with 79 threads, if that's what people want to talk about.
Believe me, it will soon be replaced by the usual anti Left Behind threads since book 12 is coming out next month and by the usual Easter basket = sin threads. They're fine, too.
On a discussion board, of course topics are going to ebb and flow.

As far as Passion threads, I thought posting multithreads had to do with one person posting the same thread in multiple forums, not different people exploring different aspects. That clear?

Those who are frequent posters, in my opinion, need to take care not to make new posters feel unwelcome. Quite often a passionate topic is what will bring new posters and new lurkers/potential posters. And then those who have thousands of posts will complain about the number of posts. Yet we congratulate each other on our individual numbers of posts even when a lot of those posts may not say anything.

Karen

 

You forgot about all those Peroutka/ Constitution Party threads in Politics and Current Affairs!

Yours in Christ

Matt

 

Gina said:

MacArthur has a KJV study version? Mine is the dreaded NKJV Study Version!

 

Let's talk about men with ponytails, women who shave their heads and people who think Dan is NOT a double poster.

 

Just looked, mine is the NKJ one too. My mistake!
I used it as a prop once so I should have remembered, if the page was still on the internet I'd show ya...did a spoof type webpage and took some pictures for it at a certain college and church in Indiana. Part of it was that we were pretending to have been chased off the property for having materials not allowed there, and the picture showing how we dropped the items and escaped was of MacArthur's Study Bible and my sandal laying on the cement.
Gina

 

Multiple threads on KJVO, The Passion, and the Constitution Party remind me of the Shakespeare play "Much Ado About Nothing".

There seems to be a consistent trend: The less important the topic, the greater the conversation.