7 Is Exploding

The whole premise of this tinfoil hat scenario is that "No steel building has ever collapsed as a result of fire". This is false.

http://www.haifire.com/presentations/Historical_Collapse_Survey.pdf

 

The other ridiculous assertion is the mythilogical announcement of building 7 as haven fallen before it actually did. What these nuts with an agenda fail to mention is that reports of building 7 was actually that the building was on fire and had begun to fall, or is falling. There was one female reporter who announced that it had fallen but in such times of emergencies reporters have mispoken such as this. One reporter with an inaccurate report does not make a conspiracy. I am embarrased for them as well all who continue their lunacy. Really this is beyond ignorant.

 

Idiots all.:laugh:

 

Anyone who buys into it as humans not races. Nice try though.

 

what agenda? just curious

 

Hard to say. But they have been on this kick ever since it happened. It is weird how the Italians have such an interest in proving this wacko lunacy. It is most certainly driven by something other than the truth. This is to easy to debunk.

 

Maybe you should read the link.

 

I'm sure I'm a little slow, sometimes, but what 'in blazes' (pun intended,) is 'Building 7' to begin with?"

Ed

 

For once I agree with 2 Tim. This is the stuff of tin foil hatism!

 

Well, I would suggest that you read some interviews with Thaddeus Crapster, if you can find them. He was interviewed on TV at the time. The buildings were partially designed that we to limit the damage to other buildings that would occur if the building fell over.

Also, building sometimes have design flaws, either in the original design or the implementation. One example is a building in NYC that is built over a church and is on three legs. It was designed to withstand hurricane force winds. But, during the implementation, rivets were used instead of bolts (or vice versa; I haven't seen the documentary in a while), and that counteracted part of the design. It withstood the hurricane, but the alteration was corrected afterward.

One thing that most conspiracy theory types like to throw around is the melting point of steel. All that needed to happen in any of the buildings, even building 7, is to heat the steel beyond the point where it loses structural integrity. If it used welds instead of rivets or something such as that, then the collapsing would begin, and it would continue at the rate of gravity.

It's a safety feature.

 

The only way that building could collapse at the rate of gravity would be if the entire structure failed simultaneously. Like in a demolition.

 

{sigh}

What the wackos are not willing to take into consideration is that several skyscrapers were destroyed all in the same day in the same area which is unprecedented.

Let us not forget that airplanes did in fact hit the two buildings and then crumbled to the ground around the others which most certainly would have destroyed the foundation of the other buildings to some degree.

Now, what you want to to is put your tinfoil hat on and convince everyone that the media is hiding the murder of thousands of people making them accomplices to who knows who or what.