1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

A modern textus receptus

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Deacon, Apr 22, 2018.

  1. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The New Testament in the Original Greek: Byzantine Textform 2018 [LINK]
    by William Pierpont (Author), Maurice A. Robinson (Editor), and John Jeffrey Dodson (Contributor)

    "The present volume displays the Greek New Testament according to its historically dominant transmissional form, known as the Byzantine Textform. In view of the significance of this text throughout the centuries, this compact edition should be of value to student and scholar alike for academic, personal, and ministerial purposes.

    Most modern critical editions of the Greek New Testament present an eclectic form of text that primarily represents the localized Alexandrian-based manuscripts. Other available editions exhibit forms of the so-called Textus Receptus or the lectionary-based Patriarchal (Antioniades) version of the Greek Orthodox Church. In contrast, the present edition reflects the regularly utilized consensus found among Greek continuous-text manuscripts that span the extensive geographic realm of the Byzantine Empire throughout at least its thousand-year history."

     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Okay. What's your point?
     
  3. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    706
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This looks like a great asset and I just found the 2005 version in Logos. I have a couple of the Nestle-Aland versions, but always check them against my KJV interlinear. Thanks for the tip!
     
  4. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The New Testament in the Original Greek: Byzantine Textform (2018) by William Pierpont (Author), Maurice A. Robinson (Editor), and John Jeffrey Dodson (Contributor) "the present edition reflects the regularly utilized consensus found among Greek continuous-text manuscripts that span the extensive geographic realm of the Byzantine Empire"


    The New Testament In The Original Greek Byzantine Textform (2005) by Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont
    Robinson and Pierpont have applied many of the same methods of textual criticism to their task, but without the anti-Byzantine bias. Their method of "reasoned transmissionalism" is based on the wider scope of manuscript transmission throughout history.

    Differing methodologies in the texts.
    The 2005 text would be a critical text 'without a Byzantine bias', the 2018 text is a consensus text (preserved families of texts).

    It would be an interesting study to observe the differences between the two texts base.

    Rob
     
  5. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    163
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Rob: "The 2005 text would be a critical text 'without a Byzantine bias', the 2018 text is a consensus text (preserved families of texts)."

    How would that be? The 2005 text and 2018 texts are almost totally identical, and both clearly have a pro-Byzantine bias, as reflected in their common titles ("Byzantine Textform" whether 2005 or 2018). It is granted, however, that a consensus text would similarly be Byzantine in overall character, but as I understand it, the manuscripts of other text-types (e.g. Alexandrian, Western, Caesarean) were _not_ utilized in the production of those editions.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
Loading...