1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

America Is A Christian Nation And Founding Fathers

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by Ralph III, Jun 15, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,997
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The only one that God established was ancient Israel and it no longer exists. God never established one among Gentiles nor do I read anywhere in His Word that He will ever do so among Gentiles or among Jews ever again.

    Therefore, yes, it is a terrible idea in the 21st century and will continue to be so until this present earth no longer exists.
     
  2. Ralph III

    Ralph III New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello All,
    It will be Thursday or Friday before I can spend any time on this but will clarify just a few things.


    Numerous of those quotes came from the National Archives. Here are just a few more.


    Now for some factual things: 1) One of the first acts of the first Congress was to appoint a Christian Chaplain. 2) Once again Thanksgiving was introduced as a day to give thanks to God. 3) Not only did they say prayers before beginning sessions of Congress but they also held Church services within the hall for 40+ years. In which Jefferson and others attended. Then in the late 1800's allowed a congregational Church have services within the hall. 4) Ten commandments are in the Supreme Court and other official buildings, 5) The entrance to Congress has a large biblical reference(sorry I will find later). 6) Congress re-enacted the Northwest Ordinance. Article 3 states "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged! This was ratified BEFORE the 1st ammendment and served as bases for it. 7) As I outlined, the Decleration of Independence was as important an document along with the Bill of Rights. The Constitution was signed in the day of our Lord.... Say what you want but Only Christian Nations would sign as such. Not secularists, Muslim, Hindu, atheist. 8) Washington appointed and Congress approved, John Jay first Chief Justice of Supreme Court, whom said
    etc, etc, etc, etc


    Call it whatever you want but this is furtherest from secularism. It has become much more secularist no doubt however. Christian Nation just means founded by Christians, where overwhelming majority of people were Christian(significantly higher diversity today), and on Christian principles. With reverence to God. It was meant to be a Nation for all people with equality.

    This does not mean other works or philosophies did not play a role. I have stated it was not founded as a Christian Theocracy. But they declared by all their personal and public words, actions, policies, prayers and legislation that God was to have a role. Look at your own State Constitution Preamble. Jesus said a "house devided cannot stand". I mention this because there are those who are Hell-Bent(sorry) on changing(continuing), America from a God revering Nation to a completely secular Nation. Watch the effects! A few of these people hate you as a Christian and America as such. Start this subject on a secular site and see what you get.



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Once again don't take my word for these things. Just look at what the Supreme Court said in "Holy Trinity Church v. United States" 1892, last half. They give an accurate account of America's heritage and the way it had always been looked upon until last 50+ years or so. This is just factual.

    Anyhow I will go into it a little more later. Sorry it is so long and jaged. Y'all have a good one:wavey:
     
    #22 Ralph III, Jun 20, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 20, 2006
  3. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    You are presenting some good arguments for your case - this is not one of them. "The year of our Lord" is now abbreviated "A.D." and it is just a date. No matter how you try to stretch it - God is NOT in our constitution.

    Stick to some of your other points, they do have merit and are at least thought provoking.
     
  4. Bro. James

    Bro. James Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    3,130
    Likes Received:
    59
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Christian" Founding Fathers

    The term "Christian" has been generalized and stereotyped to the point that a true definition does not exist--it has been lost in the hallowed halls of secular ecumenism.

    In 1776 we find founding fathers(mostly landed gentry) who are deists, theists and agnostics. Many of them are followers of GAOTU--including George of Washington.

    Fifty years later we find another "Christian" group--LDS on center stage-left. They have millions of followers today--some in high office--outside Salt Lake City. But they are not "Christian" according to other "Christians".

    Do we see the ambiguity?

    Where are the real followers of Jesus, the Christ, the Son of the Living God? Jesus said he would never leave nor forsake them.

    Selah,

    Bro. James
     
    #24 Bro. James, Jun 20, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 20, 2006
  5. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    True, C4K. This is like saying that we worship Thor because we call a day Thursday.
     
  6. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    It does show a Christian influence. It does NOT mean that the people writing it meant it. Just as Bob Riley meant nothing religious with his display at the capitol that contained the Ten Commandments.
    However, it also does not mean that they DIDn't mean it either.

    Oh, and we just way A.D now? It still means the same thing but of course most people don't know that, I would doubt.
    I wonder when and why we changed?
     
  7. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    And no matter how you try to deny it, there was a great Christian influence on the founding of the 13 states.
    It came from the Great Awakening which was one of the greatest revivals in our counrty's history.
     
  8. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    And you have never seen me deny that. A Christian influence that had the GOd- given wisdom not to try and form a Christian nation full of people who may or may not be Christian.

    Praise God for the total religious liberty which was so important to our founding fathers that they did not try to force God on the nation.
     
  9. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    We have never had total freedom though. Mormons were not allowed to marry multiple wives.

    Followers of Islam are not allowed to kill "infedels" which would include Christians.

    What they were smart enough to do was not allow one Christian denomination to rule another.
    They also did not prohibit other religions as long as they did not harm anyone.
    But the definitions of "harming" people came from a Christian perspective.
    For instance, sodomy was and is illegal in most states.

    one thing to remember is that at the time we were 13 independent states and many states had a state church, but the federal government did not want one state church to become thefederal church.
    Most state constitutions were even more clear in their acknowledgements of God.
    I think part of where we are having trouble here is what we think of as a Christian nation.


    I believe that we were a Christian nation because we were founded by men who believed, in general in the God of the Bible.

    I am NOT arguing that we had an official religion because in order to do that you have to have an official denomination which we do NOT need.

    All I contend is that we should and did have a very limited government that only invloved itself in a limited number of situations and enforced laws based on Christian principles.

    Government has very clear responsibilities in Romans 13.
    enforcing religion is not one of them
    However, they are GODs ministers and as such are obligated before God to carry out HIS law and create laws in harmony with God's law.
     
  10. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    To this I would agree
     
  11. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    The thing is, governments Biblical role is so limited, we wouldn't have most of the CHurch/State problems if they would just stick to punishing the evil doer.
    My dad was discussing this with an atheist once and he said that when we were a Christian based, everyone was free. Now that we are secular humanist, no one is free.
     
  12. Ralph III

    Ralph III New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very good points. This Nation is great because of it's Christian foundations and beliefs.


    Also some of you are looking at America strictly in today's terms! America was a Christian Nation long before the Revolutionary war and Founding Fathers. Early on it was much like Old Europe where "established Church" was the case. However, over time we indeed became our own Nation and people. Which believed people had certain rights in regards to their faith(Christian). I note Christian because, with exception of Native Americans, that is what it was. They looked skeptically, politely put, at people of no faith or of "false" faiths as seen. There is overwhelmingly more diversity today, then there ever was then if at all. Indeed, they would have found atheistic or secularistic policies, or even views, as a danger to our Nation. They encouraged Native Indians to become Christian in an sincere attempt to minister to them about the Lord. In addition as advice, so the Native Americans would maintain a place in America.

    Also the Founding Fathers were more religious than some try and portray them as. I will not debate the depth or whether you beleive them "true" Christians, but they were not the deists etc, as some have been made out to be. Many were quite reverent and personal with their relationship with God! Such can be seen alone with their prayers as they often and fervently asked God to intervene on their behalf.

    In regards to atheism and as a representation of such. Here are some of their remarks in regards to Thomas Paine's "age of reason". Often referred to as the atheist bible as was a general attack on religion and evangelical Christianity in particular. Most ALL the Founding Fathers vehemently denounced the work!

    Benjamin Franklin:
    Samuel Adams:
    John Adams:

    others:
    John Quincy Adams;
    Elias Boudinot:
    Patrick Henry:

    Etc>>>>

    Thomas Paine's died an outcast though he was no atheist by today's standards. He was buried in a farm field because no American cemetery would accept his remains. Dictionary of American Biography, s.v. "Thomas Paine."

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Benjamin Franklin: in describing America to people while in France.
    [

    America is a Christian Nation and always has been! Everyone is given equal protection under the law etc and are equaly American, irrespective of their beliefs. Only minority views and rights have superseeded the views and rights of the majority; and traditional values of this Nation. This is just factual and is not what was intended. They can teach atheistic/paganistic/secularistic stuff, while removing all Christian influence, in schools and other public places????? The Founding Fathers would flip and this is factual. :Fish:
     
    #32 Ralph III, Jun 22, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 22, 2006
  13. Ralph III

    Ralph III New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0

    Well I take this as an overall compliment. The History of this Country is irrefutable whereas it being a Christian Nation. It also is irrefutable that the Founding Fathers did not intend on God having a place in our Government, as they did. They relied on God, truly believed he supported this Country through the Revolutionary war, and had a hand in it's founding. History completely shows this!

    Whereas "Lord" in the Constitution is concerned, this is factual, and it is not just a rubber stamp. Most documents were simply dated even without A.D.. They typically only dated documents in the "year of our Lord" which they held to have importance! Therefore, there is some reverence to it and not just a rubber stamp. In addition only Christian Nations dated a such.

    Again, the Constitution simply established the form government. The Decleration of Independence contained the hopes and aspirations, as granted by God as they saw it! The Bill of Rights was more a legal issue as some thought unnecessary, because we already had the Declerations! Their debates show all of these things.

    A) The Nation celebrates its' birthday Fourth of July 1776! B) They wrote the swearing in ceremonies as such in "the presense of Almighty God, that I will support the Constitution of the United States. So help me God".

    They prayed often and called for many days of National Prayers during this period, asking God for guidance, help, and giving thanks etc. The Constitution could easily be seen as a prayer with amen at the end; "In the Year of our Lord". The Founding Fathers would have found that statement to be very accurate.:praise:
     
    #33 Ralph III, Jun 24, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 24, 2006
  14. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you see anywhere in the Old or New Testaments where it is said that he would not ever establish one again? If not, then you are arguing from silence which is illogical. God is sovereign and will do as he pleases.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  15. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Assuming to know what all God intends to do is a good way to be wrong :)
     
  16. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    I never claimed to know that. Read what I wrote.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  17. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,997
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amen. :praise:
     
  18. Ralph III

    Ralph III New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Fromtheright" thanks for the input. I know you were not debating some of the following but I would like to clarify a few things. For myself and others who may not be quite familiar.

    A: You are correct, 1) Jefferson should not be taken as the authority on the First Amendment. As it was other's involved with it's creation, debates, and ultimate language. Also he was in France during the time. 2) The Danbury letter and Jefferson letter, which had the wall of separation metaphor, took place 14 years after the Bill of Rights and First Amendment had been ratified. The letter was basically a reassurance to the Danbury Baptists they would enjoy religious freedom and equality with other Christian denominations.

    The problem is, in the last 50 plus years people have twisted or used the “wall of separation” metaphor, to attack Christianity in the public arena. They have in effect re-written the First Amendment by ignoring historical facts and 150 years of correct interpretation. The result has been some grossly inaccurate Court rulings which have snowballed into other court rulings. Justice Rehnquist outlines this in Wallace v. Jaffree(1985). Pointing out the mess such bad interpretations has created which the Court now has to contend with. A link can be found at bottom for his statements.


    B: In regards to the Jefferson quote "It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg...for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god." The two sentences are actually back-wards but he was speaking of religious freedoms within Virginia. Which along with the Declaration of Independence were his self-proclaimed greatest accomplishments. His views were not quite in line with the other Founding Fathers. IE: He called for no public days of Thanksgiving to God while Congress and other Founders/Presidents did so regularly. His later bid for Office was very contentious with being called an atheist or sympathizer of such, none of which was true.

    His “Notes on Virginia” 1781, also dealt with wildlife/politics/geography in addition to religion. In regards to religion and continuing from the above quote Jefferson went on to say:
    I just thought this may serve to clarify a few things.



    You mistook me here. I was referencing Engel v. Vitale(1962) in regards to removal of voluntary school prayer. As noted, they admit nothing in the Constitution or history called for it to be stricken. So they used language found in cases such as Everson(1947), which is what I noted.

    Everson was a landmark in which they basically re-defined the First Amendment. By misinterpreting the Jefferson metaphor of separation, as you so eloquently stated. It should have never been used in the first place. Rehnquist offers some excellent insight on the problems such has caused with the courts. He also give some excellent insight in regards to the First Amendment and Constitutional history. It is a little long but worth printing out and highlighting the major points. http://www.tourolaw.edu/PATCH/Wallace/

    Rehnquist:
    He goes on to briefly explain why Jefferson and his metaphor is a poor source, by explaining Other's prominent role with the First Amendment, the process, and factual events. One doesn't really need his opinion as a Mass of History shows all this and more.

    Rehnquist:
    This in regards to the the Bill of Rights/First Amendment.


    Continuing:
    Rehnquist goes on to explain the problems with such bad interpretations and problems it puts upon the Court. For those who are interested you should read.

    Y'all have a great upcoming Fourth of July. God Bless America. :thumbs: Ralph
     
    #38 Ralph III, Jun 25, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2006
  19. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand and I agree with you.
     
  20. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ralph,

    Thanks for the reply.

    As to Jefferson's role, I think your first point is stronger. I agree that contemporaneous exposition is the more reliable but I think we should be very careful about drawing the circle too tightly as fourteen years is a relatively short period of time.

    A couple of other good sources, besides Rehnquist's dissent, are (1) an American Enterprise Institute monograph (Religion and Politics: The Intentions of the Authors of the First Amendment, by Michael J. Malbin) studying the writing and ratification of the religion clauses (the author studies each of the two religion clauses separately) and (2) Robert Cord, in his Separation of Church and State (an excellent book, BTW) includes an excellent chapter on that subject.

    Yes, I turned them around for brevity and clarity's sake since nothing was lost in doing so.

    There was another reason for his refusal to do so, IIRC correctly. He argued that as Congress had not authorized it, the separation of powers prohibited him from doing so on his own. Further, he had no problem issuing such a proclamation as Governor of Virginia.

    Thanks, too, for the excellent resource of the quotes in response to Thomas Paine. His influence with the French Revolution, in light of his religious views, is all the more evidence against the view that the French and American Revolutions were similar. Of course, very ironic given his incredibly important role in the American Revolution.
     
    #40 fromtheright, Jun 27, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 27, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...