1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Are denominations Biblical?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by TaliOrlando, Mar 25, 2008.

  1. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    "18 For you have not come to the mountain that may be touched and that burned with fire, and to blackness and darknes and tempest,

    19 and the sound of a trumpet and the voice of words, so that those who heard it begged that the word should not be spoken to them anymore.

    20 (For they could not endure what was commanded: "And if so much as a beast touches the mountain, it shall be stoned."

    21 And so terrifying was the sight that Moses said, “I am exceedingly afraid and trembling."

    22 But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels,

    23 to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect,

    24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel."

    One of the key words in the Book of Hebrews (where these verses are taken from) is "better than." Paul is contrasting this NT dispensation to the OT dispensation that was under the law. It is better than the law. It is better than what they had under Moses.
    Think about it. He was addressing "Hebrews." Thus the title of the book. Some of those "Hebrews" were thinking of going back into Judaism, and thus the comparison throughout the book of why the NT covenant is better than the OT covenant. What is he saying here.

    1. Israel came to a mountain that burned with fire, and yet they couldn't touch it. (Neither could these in a NT dispensation).
    2. At Mount Sinai, a trumpet was sounded; a voice was heard; but the words they could not understand.
    3. The laws at Mount Sinai were harsh, insurmountable and God was unapproachable. If anyone would but touch the mountain he would die. (vs.20)
    4. Even God's prophet, Moses, was afraid of approaching God.

    BUT: YOU (believers in Christ) have come to Mount Zion (not the physical Zion of Jerusalem, but the spiritual--heaven---the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. This is a picutre of heaven. Paul has turned his attention to the believers' Zion which is heaven.
    In the OT, the nation of Israel gathered as an assembly]/b] at Mount Sinai.
    On this side of the cross, all believers will gather as an assembly in heaven, the only place where it is possible to do so.

    to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect,
    --Where will this great assembly be? It will be in the only place that all believers can assemble together, and that is in heaven--where the angels are (vs.22), where we are registered in heaven, where the God, the Judge of all is. All believers will be assembled as an assembly in heaven. The word "church" means assembly. It has no other meaning in the NT.

    The church (assembly) on this earth is always local, always means assembly, and still means assembly even as it is translated assembly here. It still means assembly here, as we will be gathered together as one assembly in heaven. This is a heavenly scene.
    There is no such thing as an unassembled assembly. It is a contradiction in terms.
     
  2. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    I have told you the truth Mike. I have asked you questions that to this day you have not been able to answer, but instead had dodged and iferred that I have lied, whereas you have been completely dishonest.

    Concerning the passage you just quoted. It was from 1Cor.3.
    Why take it our of context? That is typical.
    The context is Paul writing to the believers at the church in Corinth addressing them as a carnal church, and the problems that they were having. He was not addressing any nebulous so-called, non-existent univiersal church. That is a man-made doctrine unknown in the Scriptures. The people at Corinth knew that these words in chapter three were addressed to them. It was a letter addressed to them. It was not addressed to "all believers in the world." It was addressed to them, the Corinthians. Why do you take it out of its historical context?
     
  3. D28guy

    D28guy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    1
    DHK,

    You failed in your attempt to adequatly prove how God can refer to His "Church" as being all whos name are "registered in heaven", (the universal church...all the christians worldwide), yet actually mean christians who are in a gathered assembly.

    Here is an excerpt from a good commentary...Matthew Henry's...regarding this topic.

    From the passage in question, from Hebrews 12...

    http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/MatthewHenryComplete/mhc-com.cgi?book=heb&chapter=012

    Grace and peace,

    Mike
     
  4. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Matthew Henry did a convenient job of allegorizing that entire portion of Scripture. I do not subscribe to the allegorical method if interpreting the Scriptures. It is totally unwarranted here, and does not fit the context. There is a parallel to be sure. There is a contrast between two assemblies: the OT assembly (Israel) that assembled in the wilderness, and the NT assembly of believers that will assembly in heaven. The language in the passage is replete with heavenly phrasese--an innumerable company of angels, the city of God, the heavenly Jerusalem, etc. These are not earthly terms. It is referring to an assembly gathered in heaven, the only possible place where a universal assembly can gather.

    I do not subscribe to MH's allegorical method of interpretation, and if you want a duel of commentaries I can give you just as many commentaries that give a similar view as I have stated above.
     
Loading...