Are KJVonly Truly Fundamentalist?

You are so right, Michelle. There is a sickness within the church. It is a man-made doctrine of lies, called "King James Version Onlyism".

The Scriptures are infallible and innerrant, Michelle. Unfortunately, the KJV is not. Note, I did not say that the KJV is not Scripture, but that it is not infallible or inerrant.

"The Scriptures" as I and most other conservatives define them would be the original autographs, the ones that the authors wrote themselves. You and your KJVO buddies define the Scriptures as the King James Version of the bible, a lowly translation, as the ONLY Scripture.

KJVO is a cancer, Michelle. Do you know what cancer is? Cancer is when cells of the body change and begin growing differently than the body needs and begin attacking the body. So, you see, KJVOism is a cancer, Michelle. A man-made one at that.

In Christ,
Trotter

 

--------------------------------------------------
"The Scriptures" as I and most other conservatives define them would be the original autographs, the ones that the authors wrote themselves. You and your KJVO buddies define the Scriptures as the King James Version of the bible, a lowly translation, as the ONLY Scripture.

--------------------------------------------------

The origional autographs do not exist, but only in the figment of many christians vain imaginations. Once you realize this fundamental truth, and realize that God has providence and power to preserve HIS words of truth, and believe God's promises concerning them, then you will understand. YOu fight against a false man made label, designed to blind many from the truth. The King James Bible, is the name, or label attached to the actual words of God, or scriptures in our own language, from the origional languages. Once you understand this, and stop approaching this through the eyes of a false man made label, and understand that it is the scriptures within this label of KJB, then you will understand. God's word of truth are inerrant and infallible, and they are only found today in our language in the KJB. Your fighting is in vain. If people were to believe you, and many others fighting against the truth, then none of us would believe we have the infallible and inerrant words of God. This is not a very good predicament for one to be in. As then, no one would be absolutely 100 % sure that they could believe every single word in the scriptures. This sadly, is what is happening today. Every one does and believes, what is right in their own eyes. This is the cancer of christianity.

If you were conservative in your faith, then there is absolutely no way you could nor would condone alterations of the scriptures, as you do.


love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

Sorry Trotter but you struck out.

However, you can get one base by giving us the verse that says ONLY the orginals are the only Scriture that is infallible and innerrant.

Jim

 

Michelle, Jim,

Show me one scripture that says the KJV is inerrant or infallible. Or that it is God's only word in English.

While you are at it, show some scripture that tells us which revision of the KJV is the right one, seeing as each one is different and all.

Oh, and how about some to show us that the compiled manuscript Erasmus churned out it infallible and inerrant. I mean, since the KJV is translated from it, surely it must be as inerrant as the KJV?

I'll be waiting...

In Christ,
Trotter

 

--------------------------------------------------
While you are at it, show some scripture that tells us which revision of the KJV is the right one, seeing as each one is different and all.

--------------------------------------------------


Spelling, typeface, or printing errors do not constitute changes in the way of altering or corrupting the word of God, nor does it constitute the same difference as to the mv's being different. We have the scriptures completely in our language 100% as evidenced in the KJB. The mv's have proven otherwise, as much scripture has been altered, and omitted from the scriptures. Mv's only contain the scriptures, in part, but not in it's entirety.

I have already, and many others have given abundant scriptural support regarding the preservation and inerrancy of the scriptures. You continue again, to focus upon the label, rather than the actual scriptures themselves within the label. This is really sad, and to what is blinding you.


love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

Give some Scripture to back it up, Michelle.

I have already, and many others have given abundant scriptural support regarding the preservation and inerrancy of the scriptures.

Which applies to every translation ever known to man, or yet to be translated, Michelle. Proves squat. Try a little harder.

The scriptures say nothing about your pet doctrine/lie. It does condemn idolatry, however...

Prove that other transaltions contain only part of the word of God, Michelle. Stating that they differ from the KJV doesn't mean anything, as the KJV is a translation like the rest. What proof do you have that anything other than the KJV only contains part of the word of God?

In Christ,
Trotter

 

Gnosticism at its best.

I can see how KJVO must be a fundamental...not.

In Christ,
Trotter

 

When I compare the testimony of Dr. Clearwaters with that of anyone suffering from KJOism, the difference is so great as to be nearly incomprehensible. Dr. Clearwaters had an unmistakable love for God and His word. Those suffering from KJOism have an unmistakable love for lies and deception and a manifest repugnance for the truth. I have spent much time sharing with Mormons and J.W.’s, and although they teach a very false doctrine, they do not resort to the slanderous lies and deceptions that the KJOists do. That anyone, under these circumstances, could be seduced by the KJOists is proof that Satan is very much alive and evil beyond words.

 

Anyone with half of a noodle knows that. So does that leave the KJV as the only source of truth?

 

Amen

 

This thread is in violation of BV/T Forum Guideline # 8

It is now closed.