1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Are you a Landmark Baptist

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Salty, Jan 13, 2009.

?
  1. Yes, I am totally Landmark

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Yes, for the most part

    1 vote(s)
    2.4%
  3. I hold to some positions

    6 vote(s)
    14.6%
  4. No, I am not landmark at all

    31 vote(s)
    75.6%
  5. I'm not sure

    2 vote(s)
    4.9%
  6. Other answer

    1 vote(s)
    2.4%
  1. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,720
    Ratings:
    +660
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Do you consider yourself a Landmark Baptist
     
  2. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Ratings:
    +0
    I have what I call Landmark tendencies.

    I'm not ready for the whole package, but I hold to a lot of the ecclesiology.
     
  3. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Ratings:
    +0
    I had two professors in seminary who were landmarkists.

    Yes.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  4. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,466
    Ratings:
    +69
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If there was one shred of evidence or even common sense, I might not think the whole teaching was man-made nonsense.

    In other words, NO :tongue3:
     
  5. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Ratings:
    +1
    I had to vote "unsure" since I don't know what Landmark is. I've heard it referred to here, but know nothing about it. Since I know nothing about it, I'm probably not one, but had to vote "unsure" since I don't know what it is!

    Can someone give a brief overview?
     
  6. annsni

    annsni Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,479
    Ratings:
    +1,004
    OK I don't feel so dumb now! LOL I have no clue what it is either. I was thinking of posting....

    HUH??

    But knew I'd have to come up with some other text to get it to post. :D
     
  7. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Ratings:
    +0
    In essence we trace our history back to the New Testament times........with some variations along the way,,not called baptists, per se..............then there are variations amongst those who claim landmarkism,,there is also a strict group of landmarkists......adhere to certain doctrines such as closed communion, baptism in that local church only etc.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  8. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,720
    Ratings:
    +660
    Faith:
    Baptist
  9. annsni

    annsni Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,479
    Ratings:
    +1,004
    OK - after reading that? Nah - no way.
     
  10. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Ratings:
    +0
    In no way. Landmakism (the trail of blood) grow from a hate of the RCC. The hate is at such a high level that they are will to make up history points in order to rewrite history and fool a few people.

    However, Landmark Baptist churches are often times good in their theology. Poor in history.
     
  11. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Ratings:
    +0
    Since this is mainly a poll thread to see how many Landmarkers are out there, I suggest we move any debate to a thread on the subject which is already underway in the General Baptist Discussions category.

    Those of you who've never heard of it before are quite young, I'm sure. But a century ago, Landmarkism was the predominant ecclesiology among Baptists. It was not monolithic, but among Southern Baptists, at least, it was widespread and strongly held.

    Southern Baptists have largely abandoned any semblance of Landmarkism. But they're still out there. There's even a Baptist denomination who are Landmarkist.

    I find it curious that what was once considered normal ecclesiology is now considered heresy.

    Go to the other thread for some robust discussion.
     
  12. Allan

    Allan Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,888
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yep, even Spurgeon believed it.
     
  13. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Ratings:
    +0
    If there was evidence that we did go back to the Apostles, then it would not be that hard to believe. In their own frame of reference, the Catholics claim a link back to the Apostles, since according to them, Peter was the first pope. That in itself makes me very leary of any such claim. There is a big gap between believing that Baptists did not come out of the Reformation to we go back to the Apostles.
     
  14. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Ratings:
    +0
    Going by the Wiki definition (realizing that it is not by any means a scholarly one) and my personal studies, I hold to some tenets of Landmarkism.
     
  15. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Ratings:
    +0
    I've addressed this in a post in the General Baptist Discussion thread on Landmarkism. Go there for enlightenment and persuasion. Once you read my brilliant and incisive post, you'll be convinced.

    (Folks, saturneptune and I are fellow servants in our church. Some of this is a little light-hearted banter with a little barb thrown in here and there. We don't agree on everything but have a mutual respect and brotherly love.)
     
  16. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Ratings:
    +0
    I am a landmarkist. I don't proselytize. I don't demand that you be a landmarkist too. It is my personal study and beliefs on the history of the "baptistic" belief system.

    The Catholic Church came later and was not in existence in New Testament times. Even the claim that Peter was the first pope came in later times.

    If some want to claim the Methodist Smythe as the founder of he Baptist Church, they can do that.He wasn't even immersed and didn't practice believer's baptism by immersion.

    Yes, some of the groups we claim even had heretical ideas, but there remains a trail of baptism and autonomy. Some New Testament people had to be straightened out. Ever read the New Testament letters of Paul and Peter? If people that close to Jesus' life on earth can be so off, so can people in 2nd century,,,,,and even the 21st century.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  17. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Ratings:
    +0
    As Dr Bob has said.....

    Its a good and neat idea, but there is no support. I often have had this debate and what I tell others is that if one wishes to believe this, that is fine. However, to give support based on the facts, you will not find them. There are to many gaps to fill.

    Let me suggest a book.

    James E. McGoldrick..."Baptist Successionism".

    McGoldrick, a professor of history at Cedarville College.

    a quote from a review on that site..

     
  18. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Ratings:
    +0
    so, let's abandon all baptist churches as just another offspring of a Catholic's (remember, Luther remained a catholic until he was excommunicated) thinking. We have no reason for our existence. Drop the insistence on baptism before membership. That is just a silly hindrance to getting more people to join the club.

    It is hard to believe that so soon after the New Testament formation of the churches of Christ that baptistic distinctives we claim so dear should just disappear until the reformation.

    That is the nonsense! Pure and simple.
    As a matter of fact, this whole book lends credibiity to the claim of the Church of England to succession of their bishops and we are the rebels.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  19. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Ratings:
    +0
    I composed a lengthy comment based on Jim1999's most recent post. But to post it here would be doing exactly what I discouraged others from doing--that is, arguing the merits or demerits of Landmarkism. So I'm going up to the Landmark thread in the General Baptist Discussion section to post it. See you there.
     
    #19 Tom Butler, Jan 14, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 14, 2009
  20. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Ratings:
    +0
    moved to General
     
    #20 Jim1999, Jan 14, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 14, 2009
Loading...