Featured Babes Serving the Lord's Supper: Hubba Hubba

Am I to assume that the OP expresses that lust is to be a part of worship at the Lord's table? That there was disappointment that the "babes" were in some manner did not perform as expected?
It would seem the title may.

But, I have no idea why this thread is part of the BB.

 

My guess is the o/p author was making an observation concerning women serving communion perhaps fishing for a response of biblical authority for women serving communion?

HankD

 

Regarding his thread title "Babes Serving the Lord's Supper: Hubba Hubba," the OP explained himself in post #12:

 

And, what? You're offended by that?

 

Actually, it is an offense.

To be distracted by the flesh at a time when one should be focused upon the praise and gratitude of the promise fulfilled and that promise yet to come is certainly offensive.

Then to post about it as sailors singing lustfully about dames in the musical "South Pacific" is most troublesome.

What is the validity of the thread on the BB?

Are we to glory in the flesh?

 

Some are simply too uptight and take themselves too seriously to relax and enjoy Aaron's sense of humor. He even gets amusement from the stiff shirt's reactions to his posts, and he's been doing it since I've been on board. FYI, I've gotten a ton of belly laughs from Aaron over the years, so, I guess what ever is wrong with him ails me also....