Featured Baptist distinctives and other denominations

You have not produced ANY EVIDENCE in this thread. You produced evidence in OTHER THREADS but we are not in other threads we are in this thread.

Produce evidence in THIS THREAD or apologize for your false accusations.

 

Same here if I miss any place where the mob gangs up on you message me I will be there.

 

That is not true!

Here is your post that he responded to:

"I reject dispensationalism"

he replied:

"and other truths"

It was this reply "and other truths" that you based your charge upon and that produced your tirade!

There was no name calling in this post as you falsely charge.

 

Biblicist, do a search for the word "apostate" in threads i have been in. You will find I have never called MW an "apostate".

And he accuses me of lying?

 

Try sticking to the truth and that will be sufficient.

The so-called abusive name calling post read as follows:

"and other truths"

That is it!

 

You are intentionally skewing the facts.

FACT #1 - Your tirade was a direct response to one particular post in this thread which read "and other truths" - PERIOD!

FACT #2 - We are not in OTHER THREADS but we are in this Thread and so no amount of PREVIOUS reference can justify your charge in THIS THREAD.

Where are the posts in THIS THREAD you and Moriah have documented?? I will be glad to read them.

 

MW claims #16 is an attack, it is not. It is a challenge... which he obviously cannot meet.

 

I have read every post in THIS THREAD and Fred nor his wife uttered one single deragotory name at you as you charged.

His crime was saying "and other truths"

That was the statement you reacted to by charging him with name calling, etc.

Your charge is patently false and is obvious to anyone who simply begins on page one of this thread and reads it up to that post "and other truths."

Here is the problem. If you close this thread down and start another thread and someone merely challenges your positions by asserting they are not true to God's Word as fred did "and other truths" then you will start another tirade so that no one can dare challenge your beliefs and charge them as erroneous.

You have no justification for your charges against Fred or Fred's wife IN THIS THREAD.

You may have justification in other threads but we are not in other threads are we?????

 

Granted, it is a snide remark but that is not the post you responded in a tirade to is it. Go back and look at the post you blew up over and it was the post where he said "and other truths."

You have developed what war veterans call "shell shock." You know what that is don't you! You start jumping for fox holes every time a loud noise is heard.

 

Look, those opposed to your doctrine are going to identify your doctrine as false just as you have done with their doctrine. In both cases the inference is that false doctrine is taught by a false teacher.

If the doctrine of salvation is the point of debate then the charge will be a false gospel which means the person is teaching "another gospel."

That is a genuine charge from the perspective of both sides. The charge then needs to be demonstrated by reasonable debate instead of overreacting to what is necessarily inferred by both parties in such a debate.

 

Michael,

Biblicist is trying to give you correction, when he is just as bad as or worse than Steadfast Fred. Biblicist always resorts to calling me names, he is also allowed to get away with it. If I defend myself, or repeat what he says to show how bad it is, others come on to publicly attack me and distort the truth, while I get infractions and warnings.