Best person in 2008

In my book, Arnold Schwarzenegger, although some of his views on moral issues are different from mine.

 

Arnold's true colors come out more and more as time goes by. He's no friend of Christian conservatism, nor is he fiscally or socially conservative. RINO. He's easily manipulated by the sodomites and liberal entities that run California.

 

Charlie Rangel, but, like Pat Moynahan was, he is to smart to run.

 

I first thought it would get confused with the salt and sugar but it might work if you mix your coke with liquid???

 

Democratic Party: Russ Feingold
Republican Party: Arlen Spector

 

I believe you are confuting, confusing, and conflating my 'coke' with my "Coke®" , here. :laugh: :laugh:

Ed

 

How about the minutia that he, unlike, say, his wife, Maria Shriver, is Constitutionally inelligible to hold the office of President? Is that important enough that it count?

Ed

 

<out on a limb>

If the guy is allowed to be governor then he should qualify for the White House as well. Change the constitution.

</limb>

ETA: By no means am I a fan of Mr. Pump-up-govt-spending in California.

 

Well, you know how to accomplish that change in the Constitution.

Get elected to Congress (either in the Senate or the House); get a proposed Amendment(s) passed by Congress (only takes a 2/3 majority in the two houses for this) and submitted to the legislatures of the several states; and get 3/4 of the states legislatures (currently 38) to ratify said Amendment(s).

Or, in the alternative, simply convince 2/3 of the Legislatures of the several states (currently 34) to apply to the Congress to call for a Convention for proposing Amendment(s), and, when said Amendment(s) is/are proposed, convince the legislatures of the same 38 states to ratify the ensuing proposed Amendment(s).

Pretty simple procedure, really.

And that's all there is to it.

I would, however, add 3 personal suggestions to this.

1.) Don't try and deprive any state by the taking away the of Senators from any state, unless they have consented to this, in advance, for that balloon will never fly, at all.

2.) And don't have a seven-year time limit included in the language of the proposed Amendment, as has been the style (and death-knell) of some recent proposed Amendments, and would have, if included, prevented the adoption of some extant Amendments.

3.) Oh yeah! One more thing, IMO. Don't give up your 'day job' while attempting this, until and unless that 'day job' just happens to be that of 'legislator'.

SO - Happy 'Amending'! :thumbsup:


[Edited to add] "Pull-oop!"

"Pulll-oop!"

"Pull -oo-oo- brr- redddn'!"

"Vr-r-r-o-oo-oom! Rev-v-v-v-v! -vroo-Vroom-vroom! Putt! Putt!"

"Huh?"

"What did you say?? You need ta' speak up a little!"

It's kinda' hard to hear over my Homelite[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]®[/FONT] !"

Ed

 

You'll note: "<out on a limb>" & "</limb>." Also note the word "should."

ETA: