1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Bush: Never Wudda Happened on HIs Watch!

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by righteousdude2, Apr 15, 2013.

?
  1. Yes...

    2 vote(s)
    11.8%
  2. No...

    9 vote(s)
    52.9%
  3. Could have happened on any Presidents watch...

    11 vote(s)
    64.7%
  4. Never would have happened under Bush Jr....

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Never would have happened under Bush Sr....

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Never would have happened under Reagan....

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. May have happened under Clinton....

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  8. May have happened under Carter....

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  9. These things will happen under anyone. It is ALL timing!

    9 vote(s)
    52.9%
  10. Here's my opinion on todays bombing!

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    11,154
    Likes Received:
    242
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Now that is one BIG Oxymoron...

    "intelligence services" :laugh::laugh::laugh:
     
  2. General Mung Beans

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    2
    And Obama "held the fort" for another four years. The fact is that the number of terrorist attacks in the United States have been declining for the last several decades including under both Bush and Obama.

    The deficit is stablizing over the short term. Long-term obviously entitlements will cause a problem but right now getting people back to work should be the priority.

    How so?

    You need to cut military spending if you're serious about reducing deficits. And we're hardly "gutting" the military.

    Where would those countries be?

    ?

    Unfortunate perhaps, but then few Republicans want to abolish no-fault divorce laws either which is the main enemy of traditional marriage in these United States not gay marriage.

    Just like Reagan.

     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No what the President does depends on how bad he needs to cover his backside. Which is why he was in a hurry to give him is miranda rights.
     
  4. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    11,154
    Likes Received:
    242
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes...Don't you?

    You asked >What's the sarcasm for? Do you believe our intelligence services are a joke?<

    It looks as though - and it looks like time will show this to be a fact - that the FBI and others did a smash-bang job of following up on the concerns of Russia about the older brother.

    Yes I am being sarcastic.

    And as far as Obama needing to cut back on military, let me ask why he has NOT yet cut back on the money he and his family spend on jetting across the country and around the world.

    If large corporations can utilize cyber generated meetings, why can't the government get with the new age, use cyber meeting techniques, and save us all the money it costs to fly around the world?

    Sure, some meeting, for the purpose of security need to be face-to-face. But, generally, the president could use Skype to talk with leaders around the world.

    Do you realize how much oil, manpower and money we'd save with Skype generated meetings? There are programs like "gotomeeting," "cvent" and "imeet" to name a few. And it wouldn't take much for technology to devise a security proof cyber meeting program that could be used to help nations save tons of money and be "Green" while doing it. :wavey:
     
Loading...