Bush Q&A with US soldiers this morning was staged?

--------------------------------------------
Only in your imaginary little world.You have no substance whatsoever in your statement. </font>[/QUOTE]Bro Curtis had plenty of substance in his statement. You are just not smart enough to see past your indolent hate to know the difference between "stoked" and "embarrassed". If I were you, I would be "embarrassed", especially since youve obviously no idea that the President has on his staff a very capable Public Affairs/Media Relations staff, who occupy a great big part of the White House.

 

{As posted by emeraldcity angel}
Bro Curtis had plenty of substance in his statement. You are just not smart enough to see past your indolent hate to know the difference between "stoked" and "embarrassed". If I were you, I would be "embarrassed", especially since youve obviously no idea that the President has on his staff a very capable Public Affairs/Media Relations staff, who occupy a great big part of the White House.
-------------------------------------------
Emeraldcityangel,
It is obvious that you are not getting it,Bro. Curtis got off topic and casted out insults to all who disagreed with him all for the sake of winning some cheap points.Are'nt you smart enough to see that.Seems to me that you are the one who is eager to get on that hate bandwagon.

 

Indeed, and it amazes me how some on this board are convinced that our President can do no wrong.

Notice that I didn't name anyone, and did not direct this at anyone (that includes you, JohnV),
BiR </font>[/QUOTE]BiR,

Who are these people who blindly follow the president like cogs and don't believe he can do any wrong? I don't think I have met one yet.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Bro. Curtis also wrote:

"I'm pretty sure the soldiers that got to talk with him are pretty stoked. They see it as a commander addressing his troops."

Any particular reason you left that part of his statement out?

 

Didnt fit into his agenda Capro.

Rock, I dont hate you, I dont even know you, and actually, if you want blunt, you give yourself way too much credit. If anything you are typical. Talk about getting off topic. I think your posts are PR stunts, I just cant figure out for what though. Oh yeah, ego. Blah.

Did this conspiracy theory die yet, or is there now a secret photo of the President getting live feeds in his ear from outer space?

 

("I'm pretty sure the soldiers that got to talk with him are pretty stoked. They see it as a commander addressing his troops.")

If Bro.Curtis had just made that statement, there would be no argument and I would agree to that, it is what he added in

(bored, sit at home with nothing to do, unemployed,leftist, America hating, trust fund hippie Bush basher see it as a PR stunt)

that wasn't necessary to the argument and that is what I find repulsive to his argument.

Now however stoked these soldiers were Bush still used our military for a publicity campaign and it it was very poorly produced.

 

Indeed, and it amazes me how some on this board are convinced that our President can do no wrong.

Notice that I didn't name anyone, and did not direct this at anyone (that includes you, JohnV),
BiR </font>[/QUOTE]BiR,

Who are these people who blindly follow the president like cogs and don't believe he can do any wrong? I don't think I have met one yet.

Joseph Botwinick </font>[/QUOTE]Perhaps, your real surprise is that there are people who are not convinced that Bush is the evil, demonic, monster who can do no right that you like to portray him to be along with all but forgotten Sheehan and the rest of the hate-filled, angry bitter liberal left?

Joseph Botwinick

 

I guess if Harry and Linda Thomason had produced it, and had special effects from ILM, it would have been ok?

Joseph Botwinick

 

emeraldcityangel,
Aren't you off topic? Umm, that is very typical of you.

 

I guess if Harry and Linda Thomason had produced it, and had special effects from ILM, it would have been ok?

Joseph Botwinick </font>[/QUOTE]Perhaps Joseph, but I don't know anything about how well Harry and Linda could have produce this.
Point is that the President lost his message because the whole event was poorly produced.
Have a good day.

 

I guess if Harry and Linda Thomason had produced it, and had special effects from ILM, it would have been ok?

Joseph Botwinick </font>[/QUOTE]Perhaps Joseph, but I don't know anything about how well Harry and Linda could have produce this.
Point is that the President lost his message because the whole event was poorly produced.
Have a good day. </font>[/QUOTE]Go visit the Clinton Presidential Trailer on the Arkansas River sometime and you will see how well they can produce something. They are quite good and quite slick. We, the American People, however, didn't elect and re-elect hollywood in 2000 and 2004 to entertain us or produce a good show. We had enough of that in the 90's.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Joseph. I wouldn't be interested in seeing the Clinton Library. Bush did not do a good job of getting his message across.
Have a nice day.
Hey aren't we off topic?

 

I guess if Harry and Linda Thomason had produced it, and had special effects from ILM, it would have been ok?

Joseph Botwinick </font>[/QUOTE]Perhaps Joseph, but I don't know anything about how well Harry and Linda could have produce this.
Point is that the President lost his message because the whole event was poorly produced.
Have a good day. </font>[/QUOTE]Go visit the Clinton Presidential Trailer on the Arkansas River sometime and you will see how well they can produce something. They are quite good and quite slick. We, the American People, however, didn't elect and re-elect hollywood in 2000 and 2004 to entertain us or produce a good show. We had enough of that in the 90's.

Joseph Botwinick </font>[/QUOTE]Didya find a lot of material there about Monica, and Clinton's plea bargain to stay out of jail for perjury?

 

No. But, I did see an exact replica of the Oval Office as it was when Monica was taking care of Bill in a public office paid for by the taxpayers. There was also this great movie produced by the Thomason's that could even bring a tear to most conservative's eyes. But, once you got past all the Hollywood Happy Good times sensationalism, you remember that this is all his presidency was about: All emotion and no substance.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Ok Joseph...you have me dying over here. I am confused if the Presidential library for Clinton is an actual trailer (like a mobile home) or you are referring to an advertisement style movie short. Either way...the trailer park sounds quite apropriate for a Presidential library, and I am just giggling myself off this chair thinking of how Jeff Foxworthy could get some mileage off of it. Still in stiches...em

 

What? You haven't seen pictures of the Presidential Trailer?

http://www.clintonfoundation.org/photo-gallery.php?theme=Clinton%20Presidential%20Center:%20Photo%20Tour&pg=0&i=661

 

Here is a better picture of it at the bottom of this page:

http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/

At the top of the page, you see a picture that Clinton thinks is a great accomplishment where he made a deal with a terrorist, along with Prime Minister Rabin.

Joseph Botwinick

 

Stop it! It DOES look like a trailer. Thanks for the lift. This should have been posted on that joke thread.

 

Joseph,
Just curious, does this trailor come with indoor plumbing?

 

So if Hillary gets into the White House in 2008 can we expect a major makeover?