1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Calvinism and the Rapture

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by Sapper Woody, Jan 16, 2015.

  1. Sapper Woody

    Sapper Woody Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,112
    Ratings:
    +292
    I know this is a debate forum, but I am not trying to start a debate. I personally am nonCal and a pre-tribber. But I was wondering if all Cals hold a position other than preTrib, because of the verse that talks about "if possible would receive the elect" (paraphrase from memory). This is talking about a time after the rapture according to preTrib.



    So, out of curiosity, can you be a Cal and a preTribber?
     
  2. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Ratings:
    +366
    John MacArthur is a Calvinist who is a pre-trib, dispensationalist.
     
  3. BobRyan

    BobRyan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,837
    Ratings:
    +25

    Arminian. Post trib. PreMill.

    So that text fits perfectly.
     
  4. Sapper Woody

    Sapper Woody Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,112
    Ratings:
    +292
    Just saw I put "received" instead of "deceived" in my OP. But I think you guys knew what I meant.
     
  5. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Ratings:
    +80
    Dr. Bob I believe!
     
  6. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,862
    Ratings:
    +752
    Faith:
    Baptist
    24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.
    34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all these things be accomplished. Mt 24
     
  7. JamesL

    JamesL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Ratings:
    +207
    In my opinion, a phrase like PreTrib Calvinist would be an oxymoron. Here's why:

    Calvinism stems from Covenant Theology, which is starkly opposed to the Dispensational view of a PreTrib rapture.

    The idea in Dispensationalism is that of God will remove the Church, so that He can reinstate His "program" with the nation of Israel (I don't like the word "program" btw)

    But in Covenant Theology, the church is a continuation of God's covenants of times past, including those with Israel. That's one reason a Calvinist believes OT saints were regenerated.

    The church is either distinct or it's not. Pretty black and white.

    Those like MacArthur are holding two conflicted ideas simultaneously by trying to categorize one as Soteriology and the other as Eschatology.

    But Eschatology is one aspect of Soteriology. Old Testament "salvation" looked to a finality when God would establish a forever kingdom of righteousness. And that's what New Testament "salvation" looks to as a finality also.

    This Eschatological salvation is what saints of all times have hoped for.

    The Calvinist and Dispensationalist are at odds Eschatologically speaking, because the entirety of their Soteriologies are at odds. It's logically impossible to have one view of the covenants, yet embrace the opposing view as it relates to the finality of the covenants
     
  8. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Ratings:
    +80
    You do realize, don't you, that the first inroads of pre-trib-dispensationalism in this country were made in the Presbyterian Churches.

     
  9. BobRyan

    BobRyan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,837
    Ratings:
    +25
    By that definition I am a Calvinist.
     
  10. JamesL

    JamesL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Ratings:
    +207
    I've said a hundred times that Calvinists are nothing but Arminians in disguise
     
  11. JamesL

    JamesL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Ratings:
    +207
    Doesn't really matter. Protestantism started to get really muddled back in the mid-1800s, and everybody was trying to "restore" the first century church. Millerites, Mormons, Adventists, Russellites, you name it.
     
  12. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    19,934
    Ratings:
    +366
    Faith:
    Baptist
    End result....."freak churches "
     
  13. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    19,934
    Ratings:
    +366
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well which came first?
     
  14. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    19,934
    Ratings:
    +366
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amen:applause:
     
  15. JamesL

    JamesL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Ratings:
    +207
    They came out of Rome together
     
  16. JamesL

    JamesL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Ratings:
    +207
    Yes, but they all had their roots in mainstream Protestantism. My only point there was that not everything which cropped up within Protestantism was in keeping with Protestant doctrine
     
  17. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Ratings:
    +366
    Your URL leads to a site by Earnest Reisinger. No wonder you are confused and have such a hatred for dispenationalists and others with like views! Do you know anything about this man? You should read up on him.
    From:
    http://calvinistflyswatter.blogspot.ca/2008/02/reisinger-biography-reviewed.html

    Note how early on how this man was zealous for the Lord; how evangelistic he was.
    He lost his zeal for the Lord. But how? The article continues:
    What a sad turn of events in this man's life who used to be zealous for the Lord, and now was zealous toward infant baptism and other like doctrines.
     
  18. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Ratings:
    +80
    Childish nonsense. You brans anyone who disagrees with Darby's pre-trib-dispensationalism as confused and full of hate! Childish nonsense. I realize you would love to deny I am saved by the Grace of God but you fear getting banned. You come as close as you can anyhow. Frankly DHK I could care less what you think about me or my Faith.
     
  19. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Ratings:
    +80
    I think the chicken came first!
     
  20. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Ratings:
    +366
    I was pointing out your source OR, and said nothing about you.
    Look at the difference in Reisinger's life:
    He was saved by reading a tract--was labeled as an Arminian believer, and was a zealous soul-winner reaching others for Christ with a heart for the Lord.

    Then he was introduced to Presbyterian Calvinism.
    He became an ardent defender of pedobaptism or infant baptism, a doctrine that Baptists fight against.

    This is one of the authorities that you often quote if I remember correctly.
    It is sad to see a life so mixed up and confused, one who was once zealous for the Lord and then a defender of Presbyterian infant baptism.
    I trust you would have agreed with that much and not have defended the Presbyterian infant baptism.
     
Loading...