1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Cancer of torture at Abu Ghraib has metastasized

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Rufus_1611, May 17, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 4 of 5
  1. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    The fundamentals, none, though I think you'll find that most of those are a result of and not a prerequisite to belief in Christ.

    Rather, I find that these "fundamentals" are not the focus of modern fundamentalism. It is modern fundamentalism that I am opposed to.
     
    #61 tragic_pizza, May 21, 2007
  2. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please define what "modern fundamentalism" is.
     
    #62 Rufus_1611, May 21, 2007
  3. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :laugh:

    Meaning, I suppose that the "modern fundamentalist" is defined as anyone that disagrees with Tragic Pizza. :rolleyes:

    But, on the other hand, you do actually have a problem with anyone that believes in the "inspiration and infallibility of scripture", as illustrated by your previous stances against the Word of God on certain issues.
     
    #63 carpro, May 21, 2007
  4. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    You, sir, are a bloody liar.

    I have not, nor will I, ever take a stance against Scripture.

    What I have argued against is certain individuals' narrow interpretation of what Scripture is saying.

    You would do well to learn to become educated about what a person says before lying against them in a most unChristlike manner. I expect an apology for your slander against me.
     
    #64 tragic_pizza, May 22, 2007
  5. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    The short answer is to point to the "Religious Right."
     
    #65 tragic_pizza, May 22, 2007
  6. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are traditional fundamentalists part of the "Religious Right"?
     
    #66 Rufus_1611, May 22, 2007
  7. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sure they are. The figureheads of the RR are, after all, the late Dr, Falwell, James Dobson, Pat Robertson, etc.
     
    #67 tragic_pizza, May 22, 2007
  8. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see, so you are part of the religious right then?
     
    #68 Rufus_1611, May 22, 2007
  9. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes you have. And continue to do so.

    Anyone that argues that God does not always condemn homosexual acts, as you do, is definitely arguing against scripture.

    I believe any Bible believing Christian will agree with that statement.
     
    #69 carpro, May 22, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: May 22, 2007
  10. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    You believe incorrectly, then.

    Again, you are slandering me. This is unChristlike conduct. Apologize.
     
    #70 tragic_pizza, May 23, 2007
  11. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I am not.
     
    #71 tragic_pizza, May 23, 2007
  12. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0

    Definitely!:thumbs:
     
    #72 2 Timothy2:1-4, May 23, 2007
  13. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Parrot much, Timmy?
     
    #73 tragic_pizza, May 23, 2007
  14. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    You said that you had no issue with the fundamentals but you had issue with modern fundamentalism. Would this not make you a traditional fundamentalist?

    You then stated that traditional fundamentalists are part of the religious right. Would this not make you part of the religious right?
     
    #74 Rufus_1611, May 23, 2007
  15. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is nothing to apologize for.

    Your stance against scripture is clear.

    If an apology is necessary, it may need to come from you for your disparaging remarks against all of us that you deem to be "fundamentalists" or members of the "religious right", while you can't even define who or what they are.:rolleyes:
     
    #75 carpro, May 23, 2007
  16. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    carpro, show me where I have ever accused you or anyone else of "arguing against scripture" as you have falsely accused me of.

    YOU are an example of the problem with Fundamentalism, and a prime exapmle of what makes the Religious Right an embarassment to the faith.
     
    #76 tragic_pizza, May 23, 2007
  17. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No else that I know of on this board, besides you, argues against scripture.

    Define "fundamentalism" and "Religious Right". A definition is in order rather than a list of names of people you despise.

    Since I'm a "prime example".;)
     
    #77 carpro, May 23, 2007
  18. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is not a false accusation. Many on this board give you scripture (in English) that clearly demonstrates the obvious position of the word of God on issues that have no room for rejection. You do not take that scripture and believe it, even the scripture contained within your Bible of choice. You instead reject that scripture, filter it through your Greek, give it a couple shakes and presto, sodomy is alright, female pastors are alright and abortion isn't murder. Then you attack those "fundamentalists" who support the Bible by calling them names because you can not bring your emotions to reconcile that your sodomite and transvestite friends, may be given up to reprobate minds. You might oughta rebuke their sins and give them the gospel rather than partaking in their sins by telling them it's alright, as you've retranslated the Bible to make their sins acceptable.


    :rolleyes:
     
    #78 Rufus_1611, May 23, 2007
  19. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Retranslated?

    The Bible was written in English???

    REALLY???
     
    #79 tragic_pizza, May 23, 2007
  20. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, it has been...over one hundred times according to the MV folks.
     
    #80 Rufus_1611, May 23, 2007
Page 4 of 5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...