1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Caths/Prots: Do you believe the other side is saved?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by mojoala, Jul 12, 2006.

  1. Darron Steele

    Darron Steele New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is a HUGE variation of beliefs/practices in the Churches of Christ. There is the predominant hard-line branch, and then there is a small but growing minority of Churches of Christ that are vastly different. These are so different that they are not acknowledged by the hard-liners to be Churches of Christ :):praise: .

    The hard-liners believe everything you just wrote with one exception: they typically believe that their doctrines and practices are a perfect Restoration of the EXACT New Testament church doctrine and practice, are for that reason themselves the church Jesus Christ established, and that they are the ONLY Christians.

    I myself am a member of the hated "change" movement :). We are Churches of Christ that believe that Scripture and the Restoration principles require something different than most Churches of Christ at present. We typically believe that because of our attempts to further restore first century Christianity back in the early 1800's, we are closest to the truth, yet "Christians only but not the only Christians" -- we are a part of the church Jesus Christ established because of the succession of believers.
     
    #21 Darron Steele, Jul 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 13, 2006
  2. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    Darron, thanks for the clarification. I was aware that there is a liberal element of the Churches of Christ, and you've helped me understand it better. I have heard that some congregations have added instruments to their worship, have adopted contemporary music and are going the whole CGM route.

    Any more light you'd care to shed would be appreciated. Or is this a subject for another thread?
     
  3. Jack Matthews

    Jack Matthews New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    1
    We're not saved by correct doctrine, we're saved by grace through faith in Christ. It is possible to hear that message in a Catholic church and come to a clear enough understanding so that a person could repent and confess to salvation. It is also entirely possible for someone to sit in a Baptist church for years and never get that far.

    The Catholic Church is indeed loaded down with ritual, tradition and practices accumulated over a 2,000 year period of time. But I believe we have a God who is more interested in mercy than he is in sacrifice, and as a result, I think he is powerful enough to get his message of salvation into people's lives through just about any means possible. The apostle John clearly says, "Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God (John 5:1a NIV). That's a clear teaching of the Catholic church. It is written that way in the catechism. It doesn't mean all Catholics are saved, but it does mean that they can hear the message of salvation and respond to it.
     
  4. Darron Steele

    Darron Steele New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    0
    We are NOT liberals. We recognize that the Bible is 100% Word of God, 100% full and absolute authority, 100% full reliability.

    I hate that designation -- I doubt that you know this, but it is used by hard-liners to slander us. It gets us falsely linked to denominations that openly treat the Bible with skepticism, which is the aim.

    We are "changed" or "emerging" or something like that. This is somewhat more accurate, but the Restoration Movement did not envision anything like what devolved into most Churches of Christ. "Redirected" might be a better term -- we are among a segment of Churches of Christ that is redirecting to better follow Scripture and Restoration principles.
     
    #24 Darron Steele, Jul 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 13, 2006
  5. Jack Matthews

    Jack Matthews New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    1
    I was saved in a Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) that is a part of the same restoration movement as the churches of Christ, but has become a completely separate group. The problem with a movement or group that is trying to "get back" to the original New Testament church in doctrine and practice is that, sooner or later, you have someone who sees a way to interpret a passage of scripture just a bit differently, and someone who sees a way to apply a passage of scripture a bit differently and, poof, you have dissention and division in the ranks. In addition to churches of Christ, there are several Baptist groups in and among the various denominations, branches, and independent Baptists, who all insist that their position is closest to the original truth, and all claim to be literalist, inerrantist, and in some cases, KJV only. Yet there are major doctrinal differences among all of these groups, and in some cases, between churches within the same group. They can't all be right. It could well be that none of them are.

    The D of C/Christian Church at one time had many members who advocated for the position of being the "most correct" of all Christians. However, because it is a loosely structured denomination, far more so than most Baptists, and in any attempt at arriving at pure doctrine, being in the flesh interferes, after many splinters and splits, what remains of the Disciples of Christ has become fairly ecumenical.

    One thing that characterizes a D of C congregation, or at least a majority of them, is the depth of Bible study that is done. In my experience, the study of scripture is taken far more seriously than in a Baptist church. I find it interesting that, doctrinally, there is not a lot of difference between the two groups, but in actual practice, or ecclesiology, there are major differences.

    Most church of Christ people have little to do with the D of C, since it represents something within their own movement that is quite different from themselves, yet once held on to many of the same claims. And it is hard to criticize a group that identifies its churches as "The Christian Church" because of the name. Many in the churches of Christ consider the Disciples to be the liberal side of the restoration movement.
     
    #25 Jack Matthews, Jul 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 13, 2006
  6. Charles Meadows

    Charles Meadows New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    1
    As a former catholic I have some insight here.

    I am afraid that the percentage of true Christians in the RCC is not terribly high. That being said I think there are many Christians in the RCC. I disagree with DHK and Mike McK - one can still abide in RCC doctrine and be a Christian. The RCC teaches that Jesus died on the cross for our sins - that sounds pretty right to me. If we say that the wrong points in RCC doctrine preclude salvation then the Methodists, Pentecostals, Wesleyans, UBI, and Anglicans are in trouble too. I also strongly disagree with Mike's remark comparing the RCC to the Mormons. Definitely not even close. True Mormon doctrine (as in Jospeh Smith Doctrine books) is absolutely bizarre and incompatible with Christianity.
     
  7. tragic_pizza

    tragic_pizza New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    The main difficulty with finding "True Christians" in any branch of Christianity is that the speakers tend to define "True Christianity" by their own standards.
     
Loading...