Chick and Mary and Baby Jesus

I have shown that EVEN best-selling Catholic Historians admit to the history of the RCC and the adoption of Paganism into the church.

You object by saying that you can find a historian who will avoid discussing the specific examples Bokenkotter highlights.


Note that the PROBLEM between historians is NOT that the specific historic incidents that Bokenkotter mentions are disputed or refuted by other historians.

The problem is that they "supress the mention of them".

The problem is that when they come to them, when they can bring themselves to mention the specifics that Bokenkotter lists -- they back of off the "historian" mode and say "by faith as a Catholic I hope this is not the case - I hope that a better explanation is found and verified historically - some day".

Your "best hopes" as to exactly how the differences between historians plays out - are well intentioned - but wrong.

In Christ,

Bob

 

Bob,

Your entire last post...is based on...what?

So far, I see Bob's opinion being portrayed as undeniable fact. I see zero hard evidence.

God bless,

Grant