China's Tallest Building Catches Fire, Does Not Collapse

I guess I'm too full of neocon propoganda to see your answer, can I get a little help ?

 

Also, I don't have my KJV in front of me, but I"m pretty sure the "turn the other cheek, give him your cloak,...etc" are not found in Romans 13. Is there a correlation that you could explain ?

 

Here is bible:
Proverbs 14:15 The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going.

 

next verse....

A wise man feareth, and departeth from evil: but the fool rageth, and is confident.

 

Nitpick much or what?

There wasn't supposed to be, but you knew that. Well, yer goal of wasting the last couple pages of this thread is almost at hand...tell ya what, when the mods close this one I'll start part two how's that for not submitting to your "grown up" demands? :laugh:

That's right the one worlders rage on confident that you'll submit to their evil ungodly one world government and they're right because you already have.

 

Yup. When you make these kind of accusations, I'm-a-gonna nitpick.

 

I guess when it comes right down to it that's all ya can do is nitpick and distract everyone from discussing the topic of the thread because you certainly can't prove "19 Arabs 15 of them Saudis" were even on those planes much less that Bin Laden was the "mastermind" behind it all.

Unless of course you happen to have inside infromation even the FBI doesn't know about.

 

Well, you'll have to do better than this thread to convince me. This has been way too easy to nitpick.

This building and the WTC did not go thru comparable trauma. Period.

 

Where did I say it did?

Easy to pick little nits but you still haven't proved your theory that "19 Arab hijackers 15 of them Saudis" were ever on those planes and that Bin Laden was the "mastermind" behind it all. That's the one giant nit you'd rather leave all alone me thinks.

 

Sigh.


OP Title....

China's Tallest Building Catches Fire, Does Not Collapse


Just sigh.

 

Oh sigh...who started the thread?

My screen name isn't Rufus_1611.

Just sigh...

The nits jest keepa comin don't they?

Prove your conspiracy theory that there were indeed "19 Arab hijackers 15 of them Saudis" on those planes and Bin Laden was the "mastermind" behind it all. Just show us all the hard evidence that has you so convinced. So that the rest of us may be convinced. Is that so tough?

 

How true, how true!

And I saw the 17-acre roof fire live on TV (it went on for about
four days).

 

Alrighty then two people here are in agreement and that makes them the lonely majority so they win the debate by not debating again. Lets wrap it up and git outta here, whatta y'all say eh?

 

Yup. Let's do one better...

Let's stop all the "Let's laugh at those who disagree with us" threads.

But a parting thought, the W.T.C fireballs were pretty impressive, but short, I believe, of the energy needed to hurl a jumbo jet with 20,000 lbs of human on it across the country. Of course, my knowledge lies in electronics, but still, I went to firefighting school in boot camp, and have seen & put out fires in open tanks, and in compartments, (firefighting school ROCKED!!!!) I've seen tanks of fuel ignite, and have seen the mushroom cloud of smoke & flame, but I didn't study it, I put 'er out.

I think most of that fuel did not evaporate quick enough to burn, immediately, but seeped into carpets, walls, etc....before igniting.

 

Union built. I'm certain the Chinese building was not.

One can draw their own conclusions about that.