1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Compatibilism: Is God the Author of Sin?

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by Agent47, Jan 13, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 1 of 4
  1. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    Classical Calvinism theorizes that God's omniscience, especially perfect foreknowledge is founded on God causing everything from the shape of individual snow flakes to the briefest of thoughts to flash through your mind. In other words, everything means everything.

    This theory commonly called 'exhaustive/hard theistic determinism' is plagued by innumerable difficulties, chief among them being that God authors sin since sin is included in 'everything.

    If God causes sin, why is man culpable for it? Why is God not culpable? Calvin and his adherents have attempted to get around this by;

    1. Appealing to mystery so they don't have to explaining it
    2. Denying that God causes sin,a hopeless contradiction
    3. Claiming that God being God He is FREE to do as He wishes
    4. Claiming that all is done for God's glory (I wonder how many would volunteer to burn in hell for God's glory)

    None of these lame excuses saves Calvinism from self imposed dilemma. Neo-Calvinists developed another theory called Compatibilism.

    From the word 'compatible', the theory seeks to explain how man is culpable for actions(sin) decreed by God while God is not. The theory claims freewill is compatible with determinism.

    Compatibilism is also called soft determinism.

    The purpose of this thread is simple; to demonstrate that Compatibilism still charges God with authoring Sin, the very problem it was trying to avoid.

    I will do this in two posts with the first one examining the basic premises of compatibilism, and the next dealing with objections to this theory. It is my hope that compatibilists here will step in and correct me where I misrepresent them, as well as challenge my objections.

    If Compatibilism or soft determinism can't escape the ghosts of hard determinism, then it's no better, nor any improvement over hard determinism, and is therefore equally worthless.
     
    #1 Agent47, Jan 13, 2017
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Are you describing Hyper Calvinism here, as know of no real calvinist or theologia that would stat that God ahored sin, or causes murder, or ay othr sin contary to His nature!

    That God isfully sovereign, and haschoen/set th ,imitations on how much we can act and decide is biblical though!
     
    #2 Yeshua1, Jan 13, 2017
  3. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    There is nothing like 'hyper-calvinism', we only have consistent and inconsistent Calvinists.

    I will educate you on the difference as soon as you demonstrate you possess a teachable spirit.

    This thread deals with compatibilism. Restrict yourself to the subject else you will be guilty of trolling and spamming.


    PS
    These topics are not for everyone. If you have nothing to contribute, please ignore it; you don't have to spam
     
    #3 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
  4. utilyan

    utilyan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2016
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    293

    Jesus Christ would have to adhere to same limitations else he is not 100% human even 0% person since Jesus has no free will.
     
    #4 utilyan, Jan 17, 2017
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,415
    Likes Received:
    3,556
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As with the thread recently closed, this thread is erroneous at the start. The problem is that there exists NO Calvinistic doctrine that "charges God with authoring sin" as Calvinism plainly states that God is not the author of sin, nor is Providence worked in such a way as to make God the author of sin.

    What you may mean to argue is that Calvinistic doctrine should culminate in such a "logical conclusion", or that there is a lack of consistency within their doctrine, or that they misinterpret such and such...But as it stands you are wrong. None of those you accuse charge God with authoring sin or evil any more than free-will theology credits man as authoring his own salvation.

    You seem to bring up good arguments and issues to discuss, if only your topic were not so easily refuted. None of those you accuse believe what you would pretend they believe. You argue not against their doctrine but that they do not really believe what they say they believe. This is nothing but trolling and a fool's errand.

    I believe God is sovereign over all, nothing occurs apart from His plan and control. But I do not believe God authors evil. I believe the Fall preordained before God created man. But I do not believe God authors sin. When you get to the level of maturity that you can argue against my belief instead of against the fact I hold that belief, maybe we can have a good conversation. As it stands, you are trolling.
     
    #5 JonC, Jan 17, 2017
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    Protesting against charging God authoring Sin hardly counts as evidence against charging God with authoring Sin.

    There is nothing like "logical conclusion", logic is no respected of theories; it's either logical or illogical.

    Calvinism, or at least Consistent Calvinism charges God with authoring Sin. It is irrelevant whether it's adherents believe it, what matters is whether they effectively subscribe to it.

    You are wrong in your assessment

    Red herring.

    Whether they believe it or not is irrelevant, what matters is what they effectively subscribe to.
    Or they have not thoroughly interrogated their beliefs. Call it whatever you wish

    Adam's disobedience was God's master plan. He not only foresaw it, He decreed it. Warned Adam against exactly what He willed him to do.

    When you are honest enough to interrogate your theology, we can have a mature conversation. All else is defensive posturing which is unhelpful.

    But I do understand many to have invested all in theories so it's not easy to countenance being wrong let alone abandoning them. Throw in pride and you will be reviled and cursed worse than they reviled Jesus Christ.


    Moving on,
    I have been rather busy so I'm yet to do the two parts on compatibilism. I will verily do them in due time. Only then can I engage on the subject. I will try as much as possible stick to purpose I bolded in OP so help me God.
     
    #6 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2017
  7. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,415
    Likes Received:
    3,556
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You assume too much. You did not open a thread about why those views are wrong. You opened a thread about those people believing something they in truth reject. It would be the same if I were to assert that you believe men authors their own salvation. It is just plain foolish to define what others believe.

    I am open to discussion what I believe, and as always to refine my views. But I do not understand why you bypass legitimate debate in order to tell me I believe something other than I am telling you I believe. This is not debate. It's a child's game. If you want, I will play one time (just to illustrate):

    You believe that you, not God, authored your own salvation. You believe Jesus' was God's instrument, his tool, but deny him as Savior. I know this is what you have been taught by your "church", but you need to abandon your theories and traditions. Your theories are blinding you to God's Word. Jesus is the Savior, regardless to your theories.
     
    #7 JonC, Jan 17, 2017
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus is God, so think that He has real free will!
     
    #8 Yeshua1, Jan 17, 2017
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There are real Calvinists and Hyper Cals one, and the topic under discussion refers only to calvinists...
     
    #9 Yeshua1, Jan 17, 2017
  10. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    It's even more foolish denying what you plainly subscribe to.

    There is something I told you about Calvinism being esoteric
     
    #10 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Did Adam have real freewill to resist the tempation ofSatan? Did Eve?
    I am calvinist, and hold that they really could have chosen not to sin, do you?
     
    #11 Yeshua1, Jan 17, 2017
  12. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    Stick to your definition, I stick to mine....just ensure you stick to topic or get thee behind me ....
     
    #12 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
  13. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    @JonC This is spam
     
    #13 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
  14. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No it is not, as I am showing to you how God decreedthe Fall to hapen, , and yet He also used free will in the Planning process.
     
    #14 Yeshua1, Jan 17, 2017
  15. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Stick to what real calvinism teaches and what we believe...
     
    #15 Yeshua1, Jan 17, 2017
  16. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,415
    Likes Received:
    3,556
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The topic is
    Is this a weak attempt at denying the fact that you believe you authored your own salvation? Who are you to tell us what you believe???!!!

    Clarify your topic. Are you claiming that compatiblists believe God authors sin or that they are inconsistent because their own theory should lead to that conclusion?

    I'm really not trying to be difficult here, but one of those options is honest (the latter) and one is dishonest (the former). Which are you arguing?
     
    #16 JonC, Jan 17, 2017
  17. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What Baptist Church teaches that God autored sin and created evil?
     
    #17 Yeshua1, Jan 17, 2017
  18. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,415
    Likes Received:
    3,556
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That depends. I am not sure if you are looking for an honest discussion or if you just want to misrepresent and insult other members.

    If you choose to insult others by arguing what they believe then I have no interest. If, however, you want to argue against the doctrine itself, then you have my support. Decide and let me know.
     
    #18 JonC, Jan 17, 2017
  19. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    Spam is irrelevant and OFF TOPIC posts. Please warn him/her
     
    #19 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
  20. Agent47

    Agent47 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    18
    You make a terrible comedian.

    Read the bold part of the OP.

    If it's not clear to you, I can't help you. Leave this thread alone
     
    #20 Agent47, Jan 17, 2017
Page 1 of 4
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...