1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

conflicting KJV-only claims

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by Logos1560, Mar 14, 2005.

Top Posters
Page 2 of 2
  1. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    More "selective blindness" on Dr. Waite's part. Seems his KJVO myth is almost all-important to him.
     
    #21 robycop3, Apr 23, 2005
  2. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is interesting that it is D. A. Waite himself that shows that he is actually giving out misinformation around this nation when he keeps
    repeating his inaccurate "only 421 differences"
    count.
     
    #22 Logos1560, Apr 23, 2005
  3. Friend of God

    Friend of God Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,971
    Likes Received:
    13
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In response to the KJVOs-Don't you think that if the KJV was the ONLY accurate version that the Lord would only allow that version, and not so many others? :confused:
    I'm not knocking the KJV, just the opinions of some that it is the ONLY accurate, inspired version of the Holy Bible. 2 Timothy 3:16
    [​IMG]
     
    #23 Friend of God, Apr 23, 2005
  4. av1611jim

    av1611jim New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    Friend of God;
    In response to your question, No.
    Otherwise we would only have one church also.
    Or only one doctrine taken from Scripture.
    Or...well you get my drift I suppose.
    God allows many things which make no sense to our finite minds wouldn't you say?

    Now...if you want to have a plethora of translations, that is your business between you and God. I would only ask for the same courtesy.

    In HIS service;
    Jim
     
    #24 av1611jim, Apr 23, 2005
  5. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    David Cloud commended the "diligent study" and
    "dilegent research" of Waite, and he indicated that Waite should be taken as an example of those who defend the KJV (EXAMINING "THE KING JAMES ONLY CONTROVERSY, pp. 18-20). Cloud also maintained that Waite "has tallied and categorized every change and has shown us exactly what the differences are" (p. 73).
     
    #25 Logos1560, Jun 3, 2005
  6. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That's the same Dr. Cloud who claims the arnabeth is "a rabbit" while there are no rabbits in Palestine.
     
    #26 robycop3, Jun 3, 2005
  7. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    David Cloud also claimed that the coney [Hebrew word shaphan] was a rabbit.
     
    #27 Logos1560, Jun 4, 2005
  8. Orvie

    Orvie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wonder if Elmer Fudd knows about these "conies", or should we say, "wonies?" :eek:
     
    #28 Orvie, Jun 5, 2005
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 2 of 2
Loading...