Conservatives who don't care about abortion

You are arguing from error.

I do not argue with people who paint and accurate picture...

I argue the accuracy of the picture.

Which is something that is required of your misrepresentations quite often.

I challenge you to find a post that reflects what you have said as opposed to my reponse to your mischaracterization.

I have no problem with speaking out against politicians of any stripe.

I just prefer that the truth be used instead of the hyperbole that you very often employ.

 

I'm still wondering how it was possible for you to be so pro-Santorum and so anti-Romney at the same time after Santorum endorsed Romney.

A little cognative dissonance going on there. :laugh:

 

You probably spend hours pondering how to make ice water.

 

Hmm, I wonder if he considers this a "potential people"?

 

How about this?

 

Potential people? Golly day.

 

Here is Santorum's endorsement of Romney the last time that Romney ran for the nomination...

"In a few short days, Republicans from across this country will decide
more than their party's nominee. They will decide the very future of our
party and the conservative coalition that Ronald Reagan built.
Conservatives can no longer afford to stand on the sidelines in this
election, and Governor Romney is the candidate who will stand up for the
conservative principles that we hold dear," said Senator Santorum.
"Governor Romney has a deep understanding of the important issues
confronting our country today, and he is the clear conservative candidate
that can go into the general election with a united Republican party."

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...a-endorses-governor-mitt-romney-56763867.html

Let's not forget that Romney was a Mormon pro-abortion cult member at the time that Santorum gave this glowing endorsement of Romney.

So as I have pointed out, and as you continue to ignore...

You have been very critical of Romney.

You have been very critical of anyone on the board who was not as overtly critical of Romney as you have been.

You have lauded Santorum even though he previously endorsed the Mormon pro-abortion cult member.

What are we left to think of you?

 

per·son·al·i·ty/ˌpərsəˈnalitē/
Noun:
The combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual's distinctive character.
Qualities that make someone interesting or popular.
Synonyms:
character - individuality - personage - person - figure
More info »Dictionary.com - Answers.com - Merriam-Webster - The Free Dictionary

What is the personality of a collection of undifferentiated cells?

 

I said in a previous post that this is my last post on Romney, and that is exactly what I meant. Vote for whom you please. The question is not "what are we left........" the question is "why are you left?"

 

So don't post about Romney.

Post about yourself.

Just explain how you could support and endorse Santorum who previously endorsed a Mormon pro-abortion cult member?

I mean what does that say about your morals?

Didn't you sell your soul by supporting someone who endorsed a Mormon, pro-abortion, pro gay cult member?

 

Well, if your standards were not so mixed up, I might agree. You have stated over and over that Romney could have changed his mind about abortion, to explain the difference between his record as Governor of Massachussetts and his campaign speeches. Yet, you must think Santorum cannot change his mind from 2008 until now endorsing Romney.

Now, either you think a person can change, or they cannot. Which is it? Or, are you a Democatic double agent? If you are a double agent, which side of the donkey do you represent?

 

Never said this.

Not once.

Never.

I challenge you to show one single post where I ever said anything even remotely close to this.

So - try again.

Only this time explain how you could support and endorse Santorum who previously endorsed a Mormon pro-abortion cult member?

Did you sell your soul in doing so?

The whole board is watching and waiting for your answer I am sure.

 

Differentiation starts within four days of egg fertilization. That question is bunkum.

 

There are certainly a lot of things that you never did. You never supported the IRS abuse of power against American citizens. You never defended Romney when others questioned his abortion stance. You never degraded Santorum for opposing Romney. You never accused others of calling people "trash" when they never did. You are just one class act.

 

You keep making these false accusations...

And I keep challenging you to show even one post where I ever wrote anything even remotely close to what you misrepresnt.

Any yet you do not.

Other here of capable of reading and they too know that you are wrong and dissembling.

Billwald has over and over called different groups of people "trash".

And everyone else reading here in the Politics and News/Current Events sections know it.

How is it possible that you do not?

Is your memory truly that poor?

Or is it that your dislike for anyone who does not agree with your every word distorts your rememberances?

 

Taking myself out of your typical posts of cutting others down, here is a quote from you about another member on April 14th.

"Would you make one of your insipid toll remarks and then go make yourself a sandwich?"

Here is a quote by you from April 11, where you refer to Lady Eagle, wondering why someone never called her a name she was not called.

"You forgot to call LadyEagle a Romney apologist...
Make critical remarks about her obvious lack of morals...
Belittle her for selling her soul for always voting for pro-gay, pro-abortion cult members.
Oh well, maybe you'll do better next time."

From April 10, an example of you accusing other people of using the word trash in describing fellow members when they did not.

"Since we are not the ones wanting to take money away from the "rich" or anyone else - what difference does it make?
"Rich" is a term used by people like Obama, the Democrats, libs, and you in particular, that like to divide people up into to categories so that one group can be pitted against another.
You know - kind of like the way that you put different people into a group that you call "trash"

From April 9, a basically racist remark from you.

"Naahh... the libs already have a lock on the plantation class.
They keep them there with welfare and call them Democrat voters."

Many more examples to follow when I have time to search them out. The point is, not only are you a troll, you are a clueless troll.

 

What is the problem with this question?

This is merely asking you why you did not post your usual response to those who do not agree with your hyper criticism of Romney.

You repeatedly accused others of low morals and of selling their soul for even considering voting for Romney.

Billwald has repeatedly referred to different groups of people as trash.

I can pull up multiple posts.

I have no doubt that he will do it again one day.

Nothing racist in that statement.

So you've got nothing.

Everyone reading here on the Board can see how wrong you have been and how wrong you continue be.

You should go back to just responding to my posts with a line of little dots.

 

BTW - I just can not help but notice that saturneptune will not give a simple one word answer to a basic question that has been posed to him numerous times...

Did Santorum sell his soul when he endorsed Romney?