Coulter at it again

Hey MP, I trust that you and yours are doing well!

Ann Coulter doesn't matter. She has no relevance, no substance, no morals and no credibility. Some day, the right wing will realize this and kick her to the curb with the rest of the refuse. I have seen some claim that she is no different from Keith Olbermann, which is LAUGHABLE.

And let's not forget the statement she made in the article entitled Ann Coulter 2005, where she told us what she loved about wishing someone a Merry Christmas. Of course, as Ann Coulter is the source, it is a statement so vile, that I will not provide a link to what she said.

I wonder if there are any participants on this board who consider themselves to be neocons. If so, I wonder if they have ever read the works of Strauss, Kristol (either one) et al.

Regards, hope all is well,
BiR

 

TYeah, it is LAUGHABLE to compare the two, Coulter's marginally saner.

Ya can dish it out but you can't take it.

And you don't even know what a "neocon" is, except what Chomsky tells you he thinks one is. It's Joe Lieberman.

 

What do you need clarification with?

"Neocon" is a term from the 1960's for a liberal who advocates an aggressive foreign policy.

If the country is so polarized, Magnetic Poles, then extremist speech will become even more extremist, even the parts you don't want to hear.

You know this coz you're a tolerant liberal!

oink oink oink

 

You do need claification, don't you? I agree with your last post for the most part, except:

You have a perfect right to criticize her, but she's not an "idol", or a spokesperson, just like KO isn't for you.


And the rhetoric is just going to get worse, why would that stop?

 

Ann Coulter isn't worth listening to or reading. (Was that too blunt?)

 

I watch Bill O'Reilly and Hannity & Colmes on a fairly regular basis...about twice to three times a week.

When Ann Coulter is on, I turn the channel.

The "woman" is vindictive, ruthless, and just down right mean. She is also crude.

I really don't understand why people seem to like her so much.

I am by no means a PC cop, but there are just some things that should not be spoken about in certain manners. She seems to relish in upsetting people with her vitriolic speak.

Aside from what she talks about, the way in which she says it is also way too overbearing.

I may be wrong, but it seems to me that most of the so-called "righties" here also do not care for her. I am definitely in that number.

 

They aren't condemning extreme left wingers they're condemning ALL Democrats. This goes so far as having self-professed right wing Christians tell other professed Christians that they cannot be a Christian and a Democrat at the same time. This is most likely the way the Pharisees treated those not in their little sect. They were Christ's greatest enemies because of their hypocrisy.

 

Please show us where Keith says anything about anyone in the same manner as Ann Coulter. For example, where has Keith ever advocated fragging someone like Ann did? Perhaps you could show us where Keith made an analogy for the phrase "Merry Christmas" in such a vile manner as Ann did.

As you have claimed that she is "marginally saner," until you can demonstrate any proof, you really don't have much in terms of credibility......

Again, you haven't supplied any proof to contradict what I have written.

You really do love to display abject fatuity with every post to me, don't you? On more than one occasion I have participated in discussions about what exactly is a neoconservative. I would dare imagine that I know more about Neoconservatism than you, judging by this response. But, by all means, feel free to enlighten us on what exactly the neocons believe.

I can hardly wait to see your "Oh, yeah?" response. I wonder what website you will reference this time.......

Regards anyway,
BiR

 

I wasn't even talking to you.

I support Ann Coulter and Keith Olbermann's right to free speech, what else can I say?

Both of them, and they're not the only ones, go over the line often, that's what they do. Good for them.

 

As I stated before...

selective indignation.:thumbs:

 

Are you sure about that?

Let's look at what you wrote:

Exactly who used the word "LAUGHABLE" - in bold and in all caps?

If you were not talking to me, then to whom was this directed?

Well, for starters you could actually offer some sort of proof for your claims.......

Regards anyway - even if you weren't talking to me,
BiR

 

Don't listen to these jay birds. They are avowed leftists and full of hate speach. They take the wrong position (unbiblical) on nearly all issues. They are in favor of the destruction of the US if it will bring GWB down. And you have been here long enough to see that and I'm sure you have.

 

church mouse guy

It may be a crime in some places but how can telling the truth be morally wrong? It isn't. It's just this new thought police mentality.

 

M.P., what's the stinkin' difference between her calling Edwards this, and you calling Limbaugh a pig ? Why is it allright for you and not her ? You both claim to be christians....

"...physician, heal thyself"

"It was a joke. I would never insult gays by saying they were like John Edwards"
Ann Coulter

 

A-Pal, you have made so many insulting remarks about Matt Drudge's sexuality that to see you chiming strikes me as particularly hypocritical.


Coulter has every right to speak that everyone else has. Hyperbole sells, on the left & the right. When I see the libs bringing up Rhandi Rhodes to slam what she says, then I'll beleve what they say about balance & fairness.

 

That quote sounds just like Ann Coulter.

I've got to leave for church soon, but you do know why they're demanding this apology?:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,256239,00.html

There's hundereds of example of speech just as bad or worse on the left, take Bill Maher as an example:

http://newsbusters.org/stories/maher_sorry_cheney_assasination_attempt_failed.html

See, it's a just a joke when they do it.

 

Again...

Selective indignation on the part of liberals.:thumbs:

 

But you felt you just had to respond. :laugh:

Abject fatuity?