1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Democrats Consider Reviving 'Fairness Doctrine'

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Revmitchell, Feb 13, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    41,157
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A political battle is brewing over control of the radio airwaves as Democrats consider pushing for the revival of the Fairness Doctrine, an FCC policy that requires broadcast stations to provide opposing views on controversial issues of public importance.

    Democratic lawmakers who support the doctrine say it will help increase the number of liberal shows in a landscape dominated by conservative talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh.


    More Here
     
  2. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    41,157
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Libbies cannot compete in the free market with their ideas so they must use force to get their ideas out.
     
  3. Paladin

    Paladin New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slick Willie has weighed in on the issue

    http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/12/bill-clinton-hey-you-know-what-we-need-the-fairness-doctrine/

    The money conservative radio host earns comes from sponsors and advertisers. They have no George Soros funding the operation. They garner their listening audience with hard work. They are not given a time slot to fill some bureaucratic need.

    Hey lib radio host, try being entertaining, laugh at ourself, work hard. Attract and keep an audience entertained and informed. EARN IT.

    What is the democrat party, seemingly opposed to freedom and liberty?
     
  4. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    The real agenda is to kill conservative talk radio and TV. Do they really think that the broadcast media will put some liberal on the air that nobody will listen to?

    Besides, the liberals already have access to the mainstream media. In fact, they are the mainstream media.
     
  5. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Get ready. I forecast that in less than 10 posts, someone will post on this thread and say, "that's not really going to happen...you're just using a scare tactic."

    More and more people who are willing to trash the First Amendment are lining up under the banner of "fairness." With regards to this issue, they are anti-American and anti-freedom.
     
  6. Ps104_33

    Ps104_33 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2001
    Messages:
    4,005
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you take all the media as a whole, that is TV, print media, and radio and make two lists. One list of all the liberals and another of all the conservatives, which list do you think would be longer? The answer is obvious. With the exception of Fox News (and even that is at times debatable) and talk radio, the liberals dominate. What are they complaing about? Can we not have our little bastion of conservatism? Talk radio?
     
  7. KenH

    KenH Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,699
    Likes Received:
    22
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The airwaves - AM and FM radio and television channels 2-13 ad the UHF channels(if they still exist) on television belong to the public - which is what this debate concerns. I have no problem with the Fairness doctrine applying to those airwaves owned by the public.
     
  8. Steven2006

    Steven2006 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    0
    I seriously doubt this will even come up for a vote let alone pass. It is not 1960 and we have only three main choices for our news.This is just rhetoric.
     
  9. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    115
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I am a conservative, most who know me know this, but I don't really have a problem with the doctrine in this sense;

    I watch Oreilly and I use to like Hannity and Colmns because they bring on speakers from both sides of the issues. By donig this the left wingers are exposed as to how foolish their arguments are. If all you have is a conservative preaching to you about how foolish the liberals are it isn't as convincing as hearing it straight from the horses mouth.

    Bring-em on! Let the world hear their distorted views. I think it would do the conservative radio a service they are not considering. Just think, you have the left-wingers right there in front of you and you start shooting questions at them and let the public listen to them try to defend the indefensible!

    Anytime I ever watched a liberal try to defend such things as global warming or Evolution they just come off as idiots. Lay the facts on them and watch-em squirm!

    Hey, speaking of Evolutionist, I was on the history channel the other day and there was a woman on there explaining why modern women expect the man to stick around and help raise the kids. She was talking about how the chimps and apes are our closest relatives and how the females take care of raising the kids while the male just goes about mating whom he will and making babies. She said this changed when we began to stand up and walk on two feet because prior to this the female could carry the kids on her back and it was pretty easy for her, but when she started walking on her feet upright she now had to carry the kids in her arms and it was alot tougher, so she now needed the male to help her out, so this is how the men had to start helping with taking care of the children.

    Yeah, let-em speak! We have nothing to fear. :laugh:
     
  10. Steven2006

    Steven2006 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    0
    Steaver,

    That is all fine, but why should a station be forced into hiring someone that will bring in less ratings that would negatively affect their profits? No, the idea is outdated and has no place in this day and age with modern media and communications available to all.
     
  11. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    115
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Maybe I don't understand the details. I thought shows like Rush would just be required to have opposing viewed guest on.
     
  12. Steven2006

    Steven2006 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    0
    No. I believe the stations would be required to air a show of the opposite view if they air the Rush show. And because of that cost factor many stations would just drop Rush (or any other conservative show) instead.
     
    #12 Steven2006, Feb 14, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 14, 2009
  13. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    115
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Oh, if that is the case then it is a raw deal indeed.
     
  14. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,820
    Likes Received:
    100
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Even so, your point is still extremely valid.

    This board just verifies your theory -- er-r-r- facts!

    Like a quote I saw t'other day:

    "Americans got tired of other countries thinking they were idiots, gullible, and naive, so they went to the polls last Nov 4 and proved it!"
     
  15. JustChristian

    JustChristian New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since you insist that the national media is completely liberal I am surprised you don't support this. That is unless that often heard claim just isn't true.
     
  16. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    55
    The truth is that the democrat/leftists want to stifle all dissent, just like all totalitarian governments.
     
  17. KenH

    KenH Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,699
    Likes Received:
    22
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yeah, OR, we haven't had an election in soooo long in this country we don't know what one looks like. :rolleyes:
     
  18. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most all those are liberal run and operated, and thus not a focus of this legislative thrust.... Even so, I have a big problem with the govt. deciding program content, i.e. any "Fairness" doctrine, what ever they label it...
    The focus is Rush, Hannity, Ingraham, in short, those perceived as conservatives with large followings..... They expose the leftist agenda for what it really is, and that cannot be tolerated, if possible...
     
  19. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    77
    Question to those that support a "fairness doctrine". Should the "fairness" extend to religious stations? Should Christian radio stations be forced to have an opposing view point? After the Gospel message is given, should they have to have someone give an account of atheism, islam, hinduism, buddism, and sikhism?
     
  20. JustChristian

    JustChristian New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    We finally escaped the grip of the totalitarian government, Bush and his Neo-Con brownshirts.
     
Loading...