Do you agree with this? Washer & Lordship salvation

Trustiti and HP...

Hmmmm.


Interesting.

I know the discussion you guys are referring to. I read the posts by DHK you are referring to.


Be interesting to see how this plays out.



:godisgood:

 

ok you characters cut the nonsense! :BangHead:

I am simply stating that Web's position "sounds like" what the WOF "adhere to."
That is, they put their faith in faith. Their emphasis is on faith.
If you are saying faith is a condition then you are assuming faith is an actual entity in and of itself, rather like a tangible. But it isn't.

 

Oh boy......

 

DHK,

With all due respect, I share this.

Here is what HP said to another poster...

Wich drew this reprimand from you...

But then Webdog said this...

And YOU then said THIS...

And you are now trying to say that you DIDNT do the same thing you reprimanded THEM for?

????????????????

I mean, I dont have a dog in this fight, so I am unbiased in this.

My goodness, it seems pretty clear to me.

Nobody will respect you any less if you say "Ok, I blew it" In fact, they will respect you more.


:godisgood:

 

No, I didn't call anyone anything.
I didn't say: "You are a...."
I said your theology, or what you believe in "sounds like this...."

There was no avoidable way to get away from naming terminology since most here are not acquainted with it. Unlike Calvinism where all here are able to recite PILUT backwards, not many know about the WOF movement and I would not have been able to explain my point without the mention of the name. I never said he belonged to the group.