1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do youagree with the Ten Commandments of Logic

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Salty, Jan 27, 2013.

  1. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,725
    Ratings:
    +662
    Faith:
    Baptist
  2. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
  3. Oldtimer

    Oldtimer New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    1,934
    Ratings:
    +0
    NO!

    Best example:

    Thou shalt not kill.

    Yes or No.
     
  4. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    That is not relevant. That is not a debate argument.
     
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,131
    Ratings:
    +2,360
    Faith:
    Baptist
    8. Thou shall not lay the burden of proof onto him that is questioning the claim. (Burden of proof reversal)

    This seems to be the current favorite tactic around here.
     
  6. Oldtimer

    Oldtimer New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    1,934
    Ratings:
    +0
    Murder of unborn babies is much debated. Is it a sin to kill a baby after conception? Regardless of how the argument is framed, it is still only a choice between a yes or no position.
     
  7. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    It is not just a tactic. It is true. The person making a claim bears the burden of proving that claim. Otherwise, it is dismissed out of hand.
     
  8. thegospelgeek

    thegospelgeek New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,139
    Ratings:
    +0
    No. For two basic reasons.

    Sometimes a debate or argument can only have two possibilities.

    Secondly, the so call 10 Commandments of logic have nothing to do with logic. They apply to debating, not logic. Different subjects.
     
  9. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,131
    Ratings:
    +2,360
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You misunderstood my post. I was told recently on this board by a Calvinist that they had no burden to prove or back up their claim that was being questioned because they were the one's with the real truth and the person (me) questioning their claim carried the burden to prove their claim wrong.
     
  10. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,646
    Ratings:
    +328
    Faith:
    Baptist
    8. Thou shall not lay the burden of proof onto him that is questioning the claim.

    Case 1:
    "God does exist."
    "Prove it."
    "I've already had it proven enough for me."
    "I ain't for me."

    Case 2:
    "God does not exist."
    "Prove it."
    "I see no evidence of him, so he's not there any more than Zeus, Marduk, or Thor."
    "That's not proof of his nonexistence to my satisfaction."

    In both cases-- and I've heard or read lots of either-- the argument inevitably turns to the burden of proof being on the one questioning the claim. In case 1 to "Prove he doesn't exist," and in case 2 to "Prove he does exist." But would there be anything to debate if it didn't?
     
  11. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ah, so I did misunderstand. Thanks for clarifying.
     
  12. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    21,777
    Ratings:
    +1,280
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Really?

    You made this claim:

    in another thread : http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=84129&page=3


    When called on to prove your preposterous claim, you vanished from the thread. And it was your thread.

    Care to correct either your statement in this thread or the other? You can't have it both ways. That would be hypocritical.
     
Loading...