1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Doctrines out of context

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by tinytim, Feb 28, 2007.

  1. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Ratings:
    +0
    We all know how important it is to not build a doctrine on one Scripture, or to build a doctrine on "out of context" passages...

    Can you give me some examples of this?

    What are some doctrines that have been built this way?

    I appreciate your imput.
     
  2. J. Jump

    J. Jump New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,108
    Ratings:
    +0
    Boy are you opening up a can of worms :) The most simple doctrine that has been perverted is the simple message of salvation by grace through faith.

    There are a great deal more, but I guess my question is why the question?
     
  3. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    7,061
    Ratings:
    +284
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Snake charming is a rather inoffensive example (Mark 16).

    Rob
     
  4. Ps104_33

    Ps104_33 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2001
    Messages:
    4,005
    Ratings:
    +0
    How about baptists that baptize into the membership of the local church by using Acts 2:41
     
  5. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Ratings:
    +0
    I am teaching a Bible Study on the harm of taking a text out of context, and verse lifting, and what it will do to true doctrine.
    I am looking for examples to show how easy it is to do this, so I can show them what they need to look out for.

    And since I never take any text out of context, I can't think of any off the top of my head.:laugh: :praying: :saint:

    No.. actually I did think of the works/faith texts... you know Paul vs James...When you take one without the other, or take either out of context, it distorts scripture.

    Thanks for the input.
     
    #5 tinytim, Feb 28, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 28, 2007
  6. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    Using the "old paths" scripture to justify preferences that are often based in mid 20th-century settings.
     
  7. Andy T.

    Andy T. New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Ratings:
    +0
    Those who teach baptismal regeneration will use the "repent and be baptized" verses in Acts as proof for their erroneous doctrine.
     
  8. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Ratings:
    +0
    1 cor 14:14, 15 is often used as a proof text for a private prayer language.:laugh::laugh::laugh:
     
  9. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Ratings:
    +1
    Just about anything the RCC teaches.
     
  10. Keith M

    Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Ratings:
    +0
    Psalm 12:7 is another good one. It is often said God promised in this verse to preserve His words, when His promise is really to preserve the downtrodden (read the entire Psalm in context).

    :laugh: :rolleyes: :eek: :D
     
  11. J. Jump

    J. Jump New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,108
    Ratings:
    +0
    I like your humor.

    Here's one to make sure you get in there ;) The kingdom of the heavens (Matthew - John 3 (some manuscripts including the earliest) is not the same thing as eternal salvation. For some reason the two have been combined :(
     
  12. webdog

    webdog Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Ratings:
    +0
    "Unequally yoked" in regards to business.
     
  13. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Ratings:
    +0
    Actually v.1 determines the context of v.7 not v.5
     
  14. reformedbeliever

    reformedbeliever New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,306
    Ratings:
    +0
    Each of these two verses out of Matthew are used out of context so many times. I've been guilty of it.... till I took a hermeneutics class. :laugh:

    19. "Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven.
    20. "For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst."

    The context is church discipline.
     
  15. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Ratings:
    +0
    WOW :eek: I've been guilty of this also... you are right!
     
  16. Helen

    Helen <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Ratings:
    +1
    I knew a woman who condoned years of adultery by telling me, "Doesn't the Bible say 'God is love'? Therefore He is in this relationship."

    Then there are the truncated and misquoted verses:

    "the truth will set you free" is the THEN part of an IF clause which is usually conveniently left out or forgotten.

    "money is the root of all evil" leaves out 'the love of' in front of money!

    The sowing and reaping verses are widely used by the televangelists to get money out of people.

    Romans 10 is usually truncated at verse 17, ignoring that Paul answers his own question and the implications behind his answer when he quotes Psalm 19.

    Romans 7:14+ is often used to describe believers, ignoring that, in his narrative, Paul has put himself in a state of narrative death five times, once in almost every verse from verse 9 on.

    In Romans 9 it is claimed that Esau was hated before he was born, when the Bible in Obadiah and Malachi clearly explains otherwise.

    The discussion between God and Abraham in Genesis 15 is often used to claim that God is promising many offspring to Abraham, which He does do both before and after that time. However that particular time is explained by Paul in Galatians 3; but again the implications are uncomfortable to many.

    That's a few to start....grin. And that's without even going into how Romans 8:28 is ignored by those who used the next two verses to support ...ahem...another doctrine...
     
  17. Snitzelhoff

    Snitzelhoff New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    301
    Ratings:
    +0
    I saw someone--I believe on this board--cite "touch not, taste not, handle not" (Colossians 2:21) as a commandment to which believers should be held.
     
  18. Salamander

    Salamander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Ratings:
    +0
    Since the old paths deal specifically with holiness, it seems you have a preference against holiness.
     
  19. Salamander

    Salamander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Ratings:
    +0
    I did, and it doesn't include the footnotes in the Canon of Scripture.
     
  20. Salamander

    Salamander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Ratings:
    +0
    Actually, verse 6 and 7 go hand in hand in plurality in the pronouns: words/them, not as you suppose: godly man/them.

    I love the way God's Word is in complete harmony in our English language, it perfectly reflects the originals.
     
Loading...