1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Elect does not mean "saved at birth"

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Dale-c, Jun 13, 2007.

  1. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not with a sin nature.
     
  2. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    While I never said that, I believe sin is inevitable. Man is born not guilty. If he were, he would be guilty of the very act of being born, which is far from justice. Man becomes guilty by breaking God's law and statutes.
     
    #22 webdog, Jun 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 14, 2007
  3. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    why do you say sin is inevitable?
     
  4. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Post 21...
     
  5. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    sorry....one more thing. :)

    So is it fait to say you believe this...

    "Man is born neither righteous nor unrighteous, holy nor unholy. He has simply the capacity of becoming either.
    HOWEVER....being endowed with reason and free will, he WILL at sometime become a sinner when he chooses sin?"

    Better?
     
  6. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm still not sure about this. I'm leaving work now, but will ponder this later.
     
  7. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    post removed...but may repost later :) :)
     
  8. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,977
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Romans 9:18-21 "So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires. (19) You will say to me then, 'Why does He still find fault? For who resisits His will?' (20) On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, 'Why did you makes me like this,' will it? (21) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use, and another for common use?"
    Romans 9:22-23 "What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? (23) And He did so in order that He might make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory."

    No gall here. Your problem is with God's Word.
    John 1:12-13 "But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name (13) who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man ("free-will" rejected here in very plain terms) but of (the will of) God. (they are born by the will of God, and then born again (John chp. 3) by the will of God Holy Spirit.)
    He said something else, just prior.

    Matt 11:27-28 "All things have been handed over to Me by My Father; and no one knows the Son, except the Father; nor does anyone know the Father, except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him. (28) Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest."

    Behold the will of Jesus Christ is determining who will "know" the Father and Himself. Surely "all things" includes the salvation of men's souls, or do you believe Jesus wasn't telling the truth when He said "all things have been handed over to Me by My Father" and then in the next sentence speaks of those who "know" and those who do not know the Father.
    John 6:37 "All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out."
    John 10:14 "I am the good shepherd; and I know My own, and My own know Me.
    John 10:27 "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me;
    John 10:26 "But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep."

    Very clear, at least "some" do not believe because they are not "My sheep". When you consider Jesus had just said His sheep know His voice and will follow Him, it seems clear that all who do not follow are not His sheep.
    As already seen above, this statement is clearly shown to be inaccurate.

    peace to you:praying:
     
    #28 canadyjd, Jun 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 14, 2007
  9. AresMan

    AresMan Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    11
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If sin is inevitable, then does that not conflict with man's "responsibility"? I have seen the argument many times that God would not command man to do something that he is unable to do. If man cannot avoid sin, and it is "inevitable," then according to your logic, man cannot/should not be held responsible: man must have some kind of "libertarian" "free will."
    According to the Psalmist, one is a sinner at conception.
    Every person is born (even conceived) dead in tresspasses and sins. Each person is totally responsible because he consciously and willfully commits sin because he is born and conceived as a sinner. One is not a sinner because he sins; one sins because he is a sinner. Every person needs a Saviour.

    It's hard to swallow that every person is conceived totally depraved; yet every person is totally responsible for consciously and willfully sinning against God. Don't whine about it; just accept it. :cool:
     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Not at all.
    It's not that man cannot avoid sin, but with their nature, they will inevitably sin, as that is part of the curse. We are not born perfect, we are flawed from birth, but we are sinners once we sin.
    Other translations more accurately state...Psa 51:5 Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.
    Did you miss "the wicked"? I've never seen a wicked newborn...especially one that could talk, let alone speak lies.
    So says original sin...but not Scripture.
    Can you not see how foolish this is? A newborn consciously and willfully committed what sin to be responsible for?
    Urban legend along the lines of "God helps those who help themselves". By definition...a sinner is one who commits sin. You are a sinner because you have commited sin to be deemed as such.
    It is hard to accept any false doctrine.
     
  11. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    On the contrary Mr.Dog , it is very easy for many to accept false doctrine . Thankfully the elect will not be swayed ..."even if it were possible..."

    So you want the passages from Ps.51:5 ; 58:3 ; Is.48:8 to mean something other than which they plainly state ? And you also want Eph. 2:1-3 and Col. 2:13 to be twisted as well ?

    The mountain of biblical evidence is against you ... again .
     
  12. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hardly. Proper exegesis of the Scripture IN CONTEXT is HIGHLY in my favor Mr. Pon.

    You are right...jewish believers won't be swayed by false doctrine.
     
  13. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    WD , are you contending that Matthew 24:24 relates to Jews only ? You are again against the Scriptures . Christ's elect ones consist of only those He has chosen from before the foundation of the world -- both from the Gentiles and the Jews . Making this verse ( and by extention all other verses dealing with the elect -- the chosen , sheep , saints , His possession , His Church , His Bride etc. ) apply only to Jewish people is wrong to the enith degree .

    for false christs and false prophets will appear and display great signs and wonders to deceive , if possible , even the elect . ( ISV )
     
  14. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I never said His possession, His Church, and His Bride all refer to believing jews. Every time the "elect" is used in dealing with humans (as there are also elect angels), it is referring to true Israel.
     
  15. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not only "hard to swallow" but untrue --- an untenable INTERPRETATION. The "seed" of sin has been "planted," the "flesh." Within the flesh at birth is the sin nature in the form of "survival instinct."

    Sin comes when we knowingly demand our WANTS be met rather than our NEEDS. Do you see that? Up to a certain age, survival instinct helped you get what you NEEDED. Born as a sinner is a good PROSPECTIVE statement because our behavioral means of getting what we NEED are willfully perverted to get what we WANT --- what doesn't belong to us. VIOLA! Sin.

    This is the more contemporary, free will understanding of those verses you cite.

    skypair
     
    #35 skypair, Jun 15, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 15, 2007
  16. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,977
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Where do you find biblical support for the "survival instinct" theology?
    That is simply not the biblical definition of sin. If you change the meaning of the words, it is impossible to have the correct understanding of the passage.
    Probably. But it isn't a correct understanding of the verses cited.

    peace to you:praying:
     
  17. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    Great posting Canadyjd! I admire you guys that can deal with Skypair. I can't even understand what he's saying most of the time.
     
  18. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    That's because you're too busy studying Calvin and not Pelagius. ;)
     
  19. Dale-c

    Dale-c Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Neither can I!
     
  20. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for asking that, canady. It comes from the "curse." Everything in earth was cursed so that mankind had, for the first time, to fend for himself. Obviously, Adam and Eve were sustained by God before the fall in every way. All their "wants" were "legal" except the eating of the forbidden fruit, right?

    Survival instinct was introduced by the fall. Every animal has it. There is nothing inherently sinful about it.

    Right, wanting is not sinning. But it is temptation to sin such that we "lust conceived unto sin performed into death." Take out the "wanting"/lust and sin never comes. And where did the lust come from? It is just a desire for something God hasn't provided.

    skypair
     
    #40 skypair, Jun 17, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 17, 2007
Loading...