1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Essentials of the faith

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Thomas Helwys, Mar 22, 2013.

  1. Thomas Helwys

    Thomas Helwys New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks. I would too.

    On that basis, would you say then that the RCC has the essentials of the faith? What about SDA?
     
  2. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    27
    I would not say they possess the essentials of the faith. Both groups would agree with some orthodox christology, but if you take their theology as a whole you are left with a decidedly non-Christian faith. Both groups you mentioned teach a works based soteriology.
     
  3. Thomas Helwys

    Thomas Helwys New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, see, that is what I am trying to get at here. What are the essentials to be called "Christian"? If it is not the elements defined in the Apostles Creed, what is it?

    I would say the same thing about TULIP Calvinism that you just said about the RCC, except the works based thing. And yet if they accept the essentials mentioned in the Apostles Creed, are they not professing the Christian faith?
     
    #23 Thomas Helwys, Mar 22, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 22, 2013
  4. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    27
    Let us say, for arguments sake, that the Apostles creed contained all the essentials needed to be in the Christian faith. If the the Apostles Creed was a zero sum game, so be it. But it is not. What the early church confessed in the Apostles Creed the Roman Catholic Church corrupted. I do not think it is necessary to list all their errors, do you?
     
  5. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    To be seen as being a "real chrsitian church", MUST adhere to saved by Grace alone, thru faith alone, and submit to Bible ONLY authority for faith/practice, both of those churches do neither!
     
  6. Thomas Helwys

    Thomas Helwys New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Certainly not. But I see on here all the time, and I have been guilty of it, about some church teaching a false gospel. I was wondering what it actually took for that charge to be justified. Without meaning to step on any toes, I consider TULIP to be just as false as some RC teachings. So, when can we say that a denomination is not a true Christian one?
     
  7. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    again, arguing for either cal/arm would be "in church" debate, as both would still be teaching saved by grace , thru faith alone, and both adhere to just the scriptures...

    Those 2 tests would seperate the chaff from the wheat!
     
  8. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    27
    There is a difference between a false teaching and a false gospel. I believe synergism propagates a false teaching in its understanding of God's sovereignty and human responsibility. That false teaching does not necessarily result in a false gospel. Many synergists believe salvation is still by grace through faith in Christ alone. I am thankful for that happy inconsistency. Monergism preaches the same gospel. It differs over God's primacy in election. It creates heated debates between both camps, and broken fellowship, but it does not add works to the gospel. If you believe it does, then with all due respect, that is a problem you will have to work out.

    Romanism adds works to faith. That is not just a false teaching, it is a false gospel that lacks the power to save.
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    yes, for BOTH calvinists/Arminianists still affirm saved by grace alone, thru faith alone, just differing on HOW that process is actually accomplish, while Roman catholics who adhere stauchly to their teaching on it are in a fasle/different gospel!
     
  10. Thomas Helwys

    Thomas Helwys New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    That is the charge that Protestants make against Roman Catholics. The RCs on here deny it, and from some of their explanations I have read, they are apparently saying they do not believe works save.
     
  11. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    27
    Did you expect they would state otherwise?
     
  12. Thomas Helwys

    Thomas Helwys New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    What I get from reading their explanations is that they feel that works are part of the sanctification process. I don't see any of them saying that works can save.
     
  13. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    27
    Great! Then let them abandon Petrine succession, baptismal regeneration, and embrace the five solas (sarcasm used for effect). Seriously, do not go by what individual Romanists tell you. The Vatican has its official teaching.
     
  14. Thomas Helwys

    Thomas Helwys New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, you would see Petrine succession and baptismal regeneration as part of a works-based salvation system? What about water baptism itself? Couldn't some charge that with being a work?

    I explicitly disavow baptismal regeneration, but I don't see it as a "work", just a wrong doctrine.
     
  15. Herald

    Herald New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    27
    Water baptism is a sign only of the thing signified. Baptismal regeneration requires more than Sola Fide. Ergo, works. Petrine succession (the papacy) continues the authority of the apostles and allows for the Pope's ex cathedra.
     
  16. awaken

    awaken Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    3,346
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe that there is more in the atonement than most of us realize! But what I have learned from scriptures is that it is our faith in the complete work that Christ accomplished! His birth..sinless life...death...resurrection..and coming again!
     
Loading...