1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Everthing that comes to Pass is Ordained of God

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by steaver, Jun 29, 2014.

  1. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Do people on your side of the debate always agree on every point?

    The Archangel
     
  2. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Is it TULIP doctrine or not?
     
  3. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Again, a doge. Does everyone on your side of the debate agree on everything?? I'll supply the answer here, because it's so easy: No, they don't.

    In the same manner, Calvinists don't necessarily agree on every nuance. For instance, there is a debate about Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism.

    Further, there is a debate between people of my position--who affirm the absolute necessity of the preaching of the Gospel for salvation--and those who say that a member of the elect doesn't need to believe in Christ to be saved.

    So, there is a wide range on either side of the debate and to suggest that there is no debate within your camp just isn't realistic.

    The Archangel
     
  4. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I would like to stick with the doctrine of TULIP. Do these debates you speak of have anything to do with TULIP?

    "My side" as you call it has no "creed" it professes. I only have the Scriptures as my final authority.
     
  5. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism does have much to do with the understanding of "TULIP."

    There's a logical fallacy here. By saying "I only have the Scriptures as my final authority" begs the question that we have something other than the Scriptures as our final authority. Both sides would claim that Scripture alone is the final authority.

    Also, "TULIP" is not a creed. But, along that line of reasoning, Baptists are, historically speaking, people who have had quite a number of creeds--2nd London and New Hampshire being examples of Calvinistic creeds and the Baptist Faith & Message being the official "creed" (so to speak) of the SBC.

    TULIP, not being a creed, is a doctrine(s) drawn from biblical and systematic theology.

    The Archangel
     
  6. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Well, most of what I hear from Calvinist is that TULIP is the gospel and if you do not believe TULIP then you are not believing in the gospel. Do you believe this is true in your heart, even though you may not say it in open circles?
     
  7. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No, I absolutely do not believe that if you don't believe in TULIP you don't believe the Gospel.

    Orthodoxy can and does encompass both the Arminian and Calvinist positions.

    If I could figure out how to do a Venn diagram on this board I would... But, essentially, one might envision two circles side-by-side. One circle is Arminianism, the other is Calvinism. The Arminian circle includes error such as Pelagianism and the Calvinist circle includes error such as Hyper-Calvinism. In the middle, there would be an overlap of the two circles. This overlap would be "Orthodoxy."

    As long as a person believes in salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone--no matter whether he or she prefers the Calvinist or Arminian schema--he or she is saved.

    I, for one, am not a "Calviniser." My goal is not to preach the Gospel to make Calvinists. The Gospel is preached, in both schemas, to make disciples of Christ.

    I have good friends, "famous" people in the SBC--one person, specifically--who is not, by any means, a Calvinist. Yet, he is one of my favorite preachers and someone I admire greatly. Though he is not a Calvinist, I have no doubt of his love for Christ, his commitment to the Gospel, or his eternal destiny.

    The Archangel
     
  8. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well said. In my opinion, the issue is THAT one is in Christ, not HOW one thinks he got there. :)
     
  9. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28


    [​IMG]
     
  10. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Well that is nice to hear. I have good friends also (non famous :tongue3: ) who are Calvinist and they do not hurl insults at the brethren as some of the one's I see posting in here.

    Blessings!
     
  11. Jkdbuck76

    Jkdbuck76 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,322
    Likes Received:
    71
    Decreed vs Ordained? Anyone?
     
  12. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A decree is absolute and authoritative. For instance, when God said "Let there be light" and proceeded with creation, things not yet in existence obeyed His voice.

    Something that is ordained, on the other hand, takes into account the free will of sinful man. For instance, when Joseph's brothers did "evil" to him it was part of God's plan, but God did not "decree" their sinful evil. Joseph clearly says "what you [the brothers] intended for evil, God intended for good."

    So, we have God fore-ordaining the free and sometimes sinful actions of man to serve His purposes and display His glory.

    That's the difference.

    The Archangel
     
  13. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It might be easier to use theological terminology that has been well understood for centuries.

    God's "decretal will" and his "prescriptive will." God's decretal will is, simply put, His command that something come to pass.

    God's "prescriptive will" is what he allows due to the divergence of man from His holiness.

    This is why so many don't understand God's Sovereignty in salvation. It is critical to learn to differentiate between God's desire for someone to BE SAVED (prescriptive will) and God's desire TO SAVE (decretal will).
     
  14. steaver

    steaver Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    10,443
    Likes Received:
    182
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Is God's salvation plan really that complex and complicated to understand? What you just said here might as well be written in Latin, it wouldn't be any less clear to me anyways. But then again I have been called an imbecile :tongue3:
     
  15. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    Excellent post!! :thumbsup:

    King Darius' decree is a good example of this, imo. Whenever a king made a decree, even he couldn't go back on it....see King Ahasuerus and Esther, too. King Darius, after he had been tricked into making that decree that only he could pray to his god, tried to get Daniel off of it, but to no avail. He had to toss Daniel in the den of lions.


    Once God decrees something, He, being immutable, can not change it...
     
  16. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    1 Corinthians 2:14? :D
     
  17. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,557
    Likes Received:
    2,889
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wow, just now noticed he was banned; must have been a final straw somewhere that brought it on, oh well.....
     
    #37 kyredneck, Jul 2, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 2, 2014
  18. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,557
    Likes Received:
    2,889
    Faith:
    Baptist
    AA, who says obedience to the gospel is not necessary in order to be saved?
     
  19. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Think that many here before here on the Board, and the basic problem is that you already have a misunderstanding of the fall and "free will" to start!

    Does ANYTHING happen in history outside of what God eithers caused/determined, or else allowed to come to pass?
     
  20. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,557
    Likes Received:
    2,889
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Lol, you think you'll the last word in Yesh?
     
Loading...