1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Finally, a court that has not been intimidated by this administration.

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by SRBooe, Dec 15, 2010.

  1. SRBooe

    SRBooe New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll bet that they judge who found Obamacare's provision of forced insurance purchases to be unconsitutional is wondering about his future employment status.

    Good to see a judge with both eyes AND a spine.
     
  2. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is still an open case. It will finally be decided by the Supreme Court.

    The judge's job is no in danger. He is there for life unless he commits a crime and I doubt that will happen. His decision may be overturned. Time will tell.
     
  3. SRBooe

    SRBooe New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    His nickname "Hang Em Harry" is a rather telling name. Also, it really does not seem that fairness or facts enter into, at least some of his decisions.

    No apology implies, IMHO, no regrets that he sent an innocent man to jail.

     
  5. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
  6. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    I find it hilarous that billwald and Crabby feel qualified to judge the judicial career and qualifications of Henry Hudson...

    ...on no more than a wikipedia article. :laugh:

    As Michael Scott of "The Office" fame pointed out...

    "Wikipedia is a website where anyone in the world can write anything that they want on any subject. And you just can't get better information than that."

    No doubt Crabby and billwald believe that too. :laugh:
     
  7. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Tainted Judge Henry Hudson

    Tar ... how do you like this quote:

     
  8. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Key phrase is "where Congress has the authority"

    and Congress does NOT have the authority to mandate health care - along with hundreds of others programs they have enacted. Up until now, most folks have just rolled over and played dead with the philosophy that you cant beat City Hall. Looks like folks are beginning to wake up now.
     
  9. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Using that line of reasoning - Congress could bring back slavery if they thought that it was necessary to make a regulation effective.

    Do you agree that Congress has that power?
     
  10. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There you go again, trying to derail the thread. What is your opinion of "Hang Em Harry". Would you trust a judge who says his goal in life is putting people in prison? And, one who obviously ignored evidence in putting an innocent person in jail?

    Do you really believe he is concerned with the Constitution or his own political philosophy?
     
  11. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    The topic is the court decision that forcing citizens to buy insurance is uncontitutional.

    Clean your glasses, Mr. Magoo.
     
  12. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Poor example as that was specifically refered to in the constitution. But I do get your point. Here is a better example: Suppose Congress passed a law that in addition to your state or Commonwealth vehicle registeration' you also had to have a national registration of your vehicles so in event of a national emergency, the govt would know which vehicles they could confiscate to meet federal needs.
     
  13. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why would a guy named "Henry Hudson" be called "Hang em Harry" ?
     
  14. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And you tried to led it down another path. It is your modus operandi.

    I stand by my first post. This is an open case and will finally be decided by the Supreme Court. The more I read about Hudson the more inclined I am to believe he will be overturned.
     
  15. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Actually I made a mistake. It was not/is not Hang Em Harry," it was/is "Hang Em High Harry." Now to your question, why would he be called that?

    Would you trust a judge who made such a statement? And who sent an innocent man to jail even though there was strong evidence he was innocent?

    And did he have a conflict of interest whereby he should have removed himself from the case?

     
    #16 Crabtownboy, Dec 16, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 16, 2010
  16. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    His name is HENRY.

    It makes no sense to call him "Hang Em High Harry"

    His name is not HARRY.

    Clean those glasses !
     
  17. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Originally Posted by Crabtownboy [​IMG]
    Actually I made a mistake. It was not/is not Hang Em Harry," it was/is "Hang Em High Harry." Now to your question, why would he be called that?



    Actually, I was more pointing out that in your rush to condemn the man, playing along with Bill Wald's hijacking of the thread (something you dishonestly blame on other people), you overlooked an obvious fact. Your modus operandi. The truth is, he was approved for his post on the federal bench, after the episode you describe, so it seems the accusation is impotent.

    Kinda like the sources you cite.
     
    #18 Bro. Curtis, Dec 16, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 16, 2010
  18. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Wikipedia is a website where anyone in the world can write anything that they want on any subject. And you just can't get better information than that." Crabby Magoo
     
  19. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So prove what is said wrong ... or are yu simply trying to derail the thread again, seeing as how you are not appearing rational in this thread.

    Would you trust a judge with his track record, nickname, and appearance of disregarding evidence?
     
Loading...