Franklin Graham Romney Hypocrisy Mirrors that of a lot of Christians(SMH)

Interesting thread.

Interesting choice of words from a guy who supports the money changer's favored candidate and throws a screaming fit at anyone not pushing the leaven of the Pharisees wouldn't you say Zaac?

Even when they are being hypocritical?

Romney is a pro death internationalist candidate facing a pro death internationalist candidate. He will do nothing about abortion as every other so called "pro abortion" candidate has done. For two reasons. Abortion to a pro death internationalist is population control which the internationalists have been pushing for a very long time. And it is an issue that divides people. It works to the internationalist's advantage to have the people divided. I have watched you all fall for it time and time again. It appears this time is no different.

You have in the past and you are now throwing your country under the bus because you will not give up the false hope that maybe this pro death internationalist candidate will do something about abortion. He will not. Population control is what these internationalists are all about. And abortion is a big part of population control.

Romney is a pro death internationalist candidate facing a pro death internationalist candidate. Obama has been supporting pro death Islamic extremists. Romney has not promised to end this support of the pro death Islamic extremists on the contrary he has promised to step up the support of pro death Islamic extremists.

Therefore anyone who says they do not support pro death Islamic extremists but support one of these men are being hypocritical and lying to themselves in order to do it. By supporting one of these men you are not only supporting the pro death Islamic extremist agenda you are also endangering the United States and it's allies you all claim to support.

If that ain't hypocrisy I don't know the meaning of the word and the meaning of the word is . . .

n. [L. hypocrisis; Gr. simulation; to feign; to separate, discern or judge.]

1. Simulation; a feigning to be what one is not; or dissimulation, a concealment of one's real character or motives. More generally, hypocrisy is simulation, or the assuming of a false appearance of virtue or religion; a deceitful show of a good character, in morals or religion; a counterfeiting of religion.

Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. Luke 12.

2. Simulation; deceitful appearance; false pretence.

Hypocrisy is the necessary burden of villainy.

Webster's 1828 dictionary

Romney is a collectivist candidate facing a collectivist candidate. Collectivism holds that the individual is disposable for the greater good of the group.

The gay agenda is used by collectivists to promote collectivism so I wouldn't look for a collectivist like Romney to do anything that would do damage to this agenda either.

 

I've been here and witnessed the mental contortions the people go through here for several s-election cycles now. Bush was the great conservative pro life anti gay candidate that they all threw their country and it's constitution under the bus for at one time. I tried to tell them then but I was the crazy one.

And what did they get? Did Bush do anything about abortion? No. Did he do anything about the gay agenda? No. Did he do anything about the UN's internationalist agenda? Yes he said he was against it but sent his wife to England to sign us back up under UNESCO. Reagan got us out of it Bush got us back into it.

Did Bush keep to his anti interventionist anti nation building platform they all supported? No.

Did Bush keep to his limited government conservative platform he ran on and they all supported at that time? No. He increased the size and scope of government by fifty percent. And they went which ever way the goads were pushing them. I saw them embrace torture and the destruction of due process under both Bush and Obama.

Did they question the Bush and neocon's bold faced lies about Iraq? No they questioned those of us who were doing the questioning. They adopted a tactic I call the Goering factor and called us un patriotic and anti American for not following our internationalist "leaders" with blind faith.

I'm not surprised by the way they are acting now Zaac. They are just staying true to form. Easily manipulated and believing only in lies and fairytales. They fight for all they are worth to keep from hearing or seeing the truth. Anyone who brings up facts they cannot refute is demonized and marginalized so they can protect their false reality.

If Romney is s-elected president this time around don't be surpirsed if the mental contortionists here start claiming they are all for supporting Islamic extremism because it is good for America and our allies. That will be the lie that is pushed and that will be they lie they will accept.

And we'll be the crazy ones for not going along with any of it. Better get used to being the bad guy here because the mental contortionists here will bend reality to the breaking point to protect the false and corrupt "leaders" they still believe they choose by voting. The reality of course is that if voting really made a difference it would be illegal.

Stick to your principles and take the lumps Zaac. That's about all we can do when talking to people who are so adamant about accusing us of doing what they have been doing all along.

 

Yeah Zaac we have to support the next best man. Even though he works for the same men and has the same internationalist collectivist ideals as the man he is opposed too.

So what if he isn't a Christian? So what if his advisers are proven liars and warmongers? So what if he changed his beliefs in each of his many campaigns?

He's still our guy because he's telling us what we want to hear this time.

 

Anyone notice that the Christmas decorations are already out in the stores?

 

What a coincidence I was just talking about subterfuge in another thread. :laugh:

 

The Christmas trees seem particularly poor this year... but then the pumpkins look healthy.

I saw some nice turkeys the other day while i was driving. Thinking about turkey hunting.

 

See how quickly their minds change gears when presented with a few facts Zaac? From hypocrisy to deaf dumb and blind in a New York minute.

Amazing but predictable, eh?

Reminds me of how these guys act.

I left something out of the above statement. So I'll add it now after we have witnessed it first hand.

My statement should now read like this.

"I'm not surprised by the way they are acting now Zaac. They are just staying true to form. Easily manipulated and believing only in lies and fairytales. They fight for all they are worth to keep from hearing or seeing the truth. Anyone who brings up facts they cannot refute is demonized, marginalized OR IGNORED so they can protect their false reality."

There that's more like.

 

There is not a thing common between you and Zaac. Your focus is on secular networking of international powers. You are open and honest about how you draw your conclusions. I usually do not agree with them, but they are arrived at in a logical manner, and most of all, in a sincere manner.

Zaac has a focus on religious differences between the Mormon Church and the Gospel. His reasoning is not open and honest, but is a cover for an Obama, liberal, socialist agenda. His normal message is that anyone voting for Romney is voting for a person who worships a "false god" whereas yours is voting for either is voting for someone who does not following the Constitution, which is true. The crux of the difference is that when all smoke and mirrors are taken away, Zaac's message is nothing but a pro Obama agenda delivered in a less than clever way.

It may appear you both are on the same wave length, but IMO, you two have nothing in common.

 

My only lack of discernment was how long it took to figure you out. Most other posters had you pegged weeks ago as the Obama troll that you are.