1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

GAP: Theory or Fact

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Accountable, Aug 23, 2007.

  1. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    It says "RE-plenish." All attempts to retranslate my KJV will be ignored. It has more than proven itself worthy.

    Lacy
     
  2. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    It says "Created." All attempts to retranslate my KJV will be ignored. It has more than proven itself worthy.
     
  3. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmmm... KJVOs battling it out over the word replenish....


    This is going to get interesting...
    Anyone have any popcorn?
     
  4. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isa 65:17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

    This says create also.
     
  5. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    Let's see now, since Isaiah wrote that verse circa 690 BC, and Abraham was told to Isaac circa 1872, the new heaven and earth created must have been some time after Abraham and Isaac. That would put it many more years after the creation account in Genesis.

    God did say in Isaiah, "I create,' did He not? He did not say created (past tense), but create (present tense). Yep, just checked.

    I submit to you that your gap theory is so full of holes it is like a sunken ship...

    That boat don't float.
     
  6. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. I'm not a KJVO or any other Onlyist. What I'm advocating, along with many others, is to take proper scholarship into consideration.

    2. Here's the question, maybe you might be able to answer it, Why did the KJV translate Hebrew verb male "fill" in Genesis 1:22 but "replenish" in v. 28?
     
    #166 TCGreek, Aug 30, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 30, 2007
  7. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    Funny, the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. Yet, in your minds, there is a former earth before this one. Which further proves the gap theory is nothing more than theory.

    The supposed past earth has entered your minds, and the Bible says that the former will not come into mind.

    More holes in the gap theory.
     
  8. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who inhabited this "previous earth" men or angles?

    What is the context of replenish in Genesis 1:28 and what words in that verse indicate such?
     
  9. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    If they also believed the gap theory, then they obviously were.
     
  11. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0
  12. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    It is interesting that the Geneva Bible (1599) translated the word 'male' (maw-lay) as fill in Genesis 1:28

    Wycliffe (1388) also uses the word 'fille' in this verse.
     
Loading...