1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Gap Theory - the poll

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Salty, Oct 10, 2009.

?
  1. The Bible plainly teaches AGAINST the Gap theory

    4 vote(s)
    12.9%
  2. The Bible in context would not allow for a gap theory

    10 vote(s)
    32.3%
  3. The Bible does not appear to support a Gap theory

    6 vote(s)
    19.4%
  4. The Bible is silent about the Gap theory

    1 vote(s)
    3.2%
  5. The Bible appears to support a Gap theory

    1 vote(s)
    3.2%
  6. The Bible in context allows for a gap theory

    6 vote(s)
    19.4%
  7. The Bible plainly teaches there is a Gap( more than a year) between Gen 1:1 and 1:2

    1 vote(s)
    3.2%
  8. Not sure

    2 vote(s)
    6.5%
  9. Other answer

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,902
    Ratings:
    +612
    Faith:
    Baptist
  2. TC

    TC Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,241
    Ratings:
    +30
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Gen 1:1-2
    Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.


    I am kind of on the fence on this one. The Bible does not say how long the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. It could have been a long or short time. I just don't know. I was not there when God made the Earth. Lest anyone accuse me of not believing the Bible, I am a creationist and believe that God created everything that was made. I do not believe in evolution - evolution is nothing more than fanciful story telling and seems like a lot of wishful thinking to me.
     
  3. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Ratings:
    +0
    In order to believe the Gap theory, one must assume it from outside the text. Nothing in the text indicates such a "gap." It doesn't matter how long the Spirit of God hovered - there is no indication earth was destroyed and re-created.
     
  4. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,169
    Ratings:
    +0
    No Gap Theory in the Bible. Good fiction though.
     
  5. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm not up on this Gap theory. What is it exactly? If it pertains to Genesis then it will surely interest me. I've always been fascinated by Genesis.
     
  6. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Ratings:
    +0
    Gap Theory asserts that the Genesis six-day creation involved literal 24-hour days, but that there was a gap of time between two distinct creations in the first and the second verses of Genesis.

    It's actually a misnomer, because it doesn't qualify as a theory according to the definition of what a theory is. Like Intelligent Design, it can be best described as a gap philosophy. A literal reading of Gen 1 does not suggest a gap consisting of two creations.
     
  7. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    How do they come up with two distinct creations?
     
  8. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,169
    Ratings:
    +0
    The way it was put to me was. In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth - Now would God make anything imperfect or full of Chaos? Then we see - The earth was formless and void - Well, what happened I thought God just created everything. Thus a Gap of an unspecified period of time.
     
  9. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't think void meant nonexistent, but rather, plain, featureless, desolate, etc. There was obviously water existing, and apparently there was no separation between the heavens and earth. Like one big empty canvas I guess.
     
  10. Marcia

    Marcia Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Ratings:
    +0
    Right, nothing in the language suggests chaos or previous destruction. The Gap Theory came about, as far as I know, after evolution theories in order to make Genesis and evolution compatible.

    If a gap were implied here, people before evolution came along would have discerned it in the text.
     
  11. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm no scientist but the world ain't no billion years old. Excuse my southern.
     
  12. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Ratings:
    +0
    To be specific, the field of geology and geophysics estimate the age of the earth to be 4.5 billion years old.

    Now that we've opened that can of worms, it's probably best to get back to the topic of Gap Theory, rather than have this thread denegrate into another needless debate and veer it off topic.
     
  13. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'd say their estimators broke. :smilewinkgrin: Sorry for the off topic. I don't see where the gap theory is possible. It doesn't really matter what you perceive the details of verse 2 to mean, verse 5 says it all happened on day 1.
     
  14. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Ratings:
    +0
    Huh? Verse 5 reads "... every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground." All that says is that man was not yet around to till the earth. That verse in and of itself doesn't say what happenned and when.
     
  15. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
     
  16. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Ratings:
    +0
    No fair, you didn't say what chapter :wavey:

    Thinkingstuff makes a good observation: That prior to v5, according to Gap supporters, there existed an earth, but it was without form.
     
    #16 Johnv, Oct 14, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 14, 2009
  17. JMSR

    JMSR New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    212
    Ratings:
    +0
    Chapter 1 of course. :tongue3: Sorry I didn't clarify.
     
  18. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Ratings:
    +75
    There is as much evidence for the Gap Theory as there is the Macro-evolution Theory, NONE. They are both figments of a tired imagination!
     
  19. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Ratings:
    +0
    So much for staying on topic.
     
  20. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,902
    Ratings:
    +612
    Faith:
    Baptist
Loading...