Getting to Know the NIV Translators

Now why would they want to do that? MV defenders know that it's best to keep the "qualifications" and beliefs of their translators secret.


Jim

 

Although many here laugh at fact that it was the Anglicans who translated the Authorized Version, I think you miss the point of why so many Christians hold to the KJV. It has proven itself over the centuries. Since God has blessed this Holy Book, I do not see any reason to switch Bibles now, especially not to a Bible translated by this apostate generation.

 

I couldn't agree more.

it's almost sad how these mv lovers can't see the fact that the resons for all the various new mv's is just for someone to make money. They don't care about Biblical accurast, just $$$$$$

 

Interesting list

 

michelle said:

If you trust the Ecumenical and apostate days with a melting pot of beliefs of the translators, and the corrupt texts that underline them in these perilous times, go right ahead.

Thank you. That sounds like a great idea.

 

Thumpster said:

This list does not include their qualifications

If you popped your head up out of your self-imposed "fundamentalist" hidey-hole once in a while, you would know their qualifications.

 

Jim Ward said:

They don't care about Biblical accurast, just $$$$$$$

Yeah, we should pay more attention to someone who not only apparently has no knowledge of translation, but doesn't appear to care about English "accurast" either.

 

I see that Ransom is back to his usual tactics of insulting others.

[ September 18, 2004, 07:47 PM: Message edited by: Pastor_Bob ]

 

You're right, Terry. The course of action I took is wrong.

Instead, I should just have posted the names of all the KJV translators and hinted that they were evil or something, without actually providing any evidence that it was so, or even actually saying so.

 

That's great that you were are interested in studying Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic. Apparently you have come out of the KJV 1611 only crowd.

 

I couldn't agree more.

it's almost sad how these mv lovers can't see the fact that the resons for all the various new mv's is just for someone to make money. They don't care about Biblical accurast, just $$$$$$ </font>[/QUOTE]Please, Jim, show the MV users just exactly where it comes down to the "money" as you put it for the use of the MV's. And, also, please prove that MV users don't care about Bible accuracy.

AVL1984

 

Praise the Lord for these translators!

 

Amazingly enough I did spend several hours on the net looking for a pro-NIV site thta would give me information about the translators. I found only the site that was posted and it does not give a full list and there is nothing in there about Virginia Mollencott.(go figure) Apparently they dont like people knowing about her. So possibly you could "enlighten" me as to where to go to find a complete list of qualifications for ALL of them?

 

This is a specious argument. When I go to the Christian book store. The KJV cost just as much as any other translation. This ridiculous charge needs to be put to rest permanantly.

Bro Tony

 

This is a specious argument. When I go to the Christian book store. The KJV cost just as much as any other translation. This ridiculous charge needs to be put to rest permanantly.

Bro Tony </font>[/QUOTE]Sounds like they make more money on the KJV because they don't have to pay for translation work.

 

What I found after a quick search FROM HERE

 

Google shows:

for Virginia Mollenkott - 674 results
for Virginia Mollencott - 065 results

Recommend the correct spelling be used.

Searching my leads down i find something
interesting:

--------------------total---www.av1611.org---chick.com
Virginia Mollenkott - 674-------18 times-----1 time
Virginia Mollencott - 65---------2 times-----22 times

So Chick Comics must be the source of
the misspelling. BTW, the 1 "hit" on
the "K" spelling with chick.com was
a pointer to it from another source

[ September 19, 2004, 10:34 PM: Message edited by: Ed Edwards ]

 

Even the perverts like Mollenkott?