1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

God's Sovereign Choice and Man's Natural Condition

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by The Archangel, Jan 20, 2010.

  1. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Allan,

    Thank you for the clarification.

    "Need" is not, I think, a proper term. God chooses to blind/harden the already blind/hardened to magnify their judgment (to make it more) so that His grace is more glorious to the elect.

    So, my answer is still the same: To magnify the judgment against them in order to maximize His glory.

    Blessings to you (both)

    The Archangel
     
  2. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The passages don't relate, but I'll play along.

    I'll freely admit and readily admit that the "all" passages are a hole in the Calvinist argument. However, it is a hole that is easily filled, even though it is most likely you won't accept the explanation.

    In the John passage, Jesus says that He will draw all to Himself. But it must be the case that "all" doesn't mean all without exception. There are many people in many centuries (after the Cross) who have lived and died never having heard of Jesus or the Cross. So, it cannot mean all without exception.

    Here's an example. Let's say I complete a crossword puzzle. Out of joy (and amazement!) I tell my wife "I got all the words." Now, does that mean I was able to put all the known words into that crossword puzzle? Or does it mean I got all the words the clues (and therefore the puzzle) were asking for? It is, obviously, the second option.

    The word in Greek is very contextually driven and doesn't always mean "all without exception."

    Blessings,

    The Archangel
     
  3. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    So, you admit that God needed to blind Pharaoh in order to keep him from being convinced and believing before the appointed time, but when it comes to the Jews being hardened, there is no need? Explain.

    You don't think that the hardening actually accomplished what the bible says it accomplished..."For this reason they could not believe, because, as Isaiah says elsewhere: 40 "He has blinded their eyes and deadened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn--and I would heal them." John 12:39-40

    It seems like you are arguing that these people didn't NEED to be hardened, so God only did this to magnify his glory. But I see at least 3 major issues with that.

    1. The bible tells us why God hardened them. To keep them from seeing, hearing or repenting.

    2. The bible tells us what they could have done OTHERWISE.

    As Paul tells us CLEARLY: "Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.' 28 "Therefore I want you to know that God's salvation has been sent to the Gentiles, and they will listen!"

    3. How does it bring God more glory to confuse his people by making it appear that he needed to blind men born already totally blind? Hardening Pharaoh brought Him more Glory because it prevented Pharaoh from being convinced too soon so as to make sure more plagues were completed, thus God's Glory was revealed more fully. That makes sense.

    Hardening Jews brought God more glory because it prevented them from repenting and believing before they crucified Christ and before the Gentiles were established in the church. Both of which brings God more glory. That makes sense.

    But if the Jews didn't NEED to be hardened (as you seem to be arguing here) then what is the point? How does this act bring God more glory? Please explain.

    It's not judgement enough to lock them from birth into a totally depraved nature predestining them to certain condemnation because of a couple ate a forbidden fruit? You are saying he needed to emphasize his judgement further by doing something to them they already had done to them from birth due to the fall? Really?
     
  4. Allan

    Allan Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,902
    Likes Received:
    5
    Again, not meaning to interupt here but you are confusing me. If I may have a moment to organize what I 'presume' is your thoughts..

    1. Man is completely blind/hardened already and thus not only will they not but in fact can not choose God or do any salvic good. (I'm with you on this point)

    2. God chooses to blind/harden man who is 'already' comepletely blind/hardened so as to maginify or increase His judgment against them...
    ...(here you lost me like a needle in a shag rug)

    My first question is, how exactly does God blind an already and completely blind man?

    Second, even if a completely blind man can be blinded even more by God's causing it.. Please explain how is it judicially just for a Holy God to increase/magnify His judgment against them for what He/God actively made them to be by blinding/hardening them even more?

    Just to be clear.. the above is regarding the increasing/magnifying of His judgement against them specifically for God has done to them- blinding and Hardening of them?
     
    #44 Allan, Jan 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 22, 2010
  5. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Not so. It can mean all without exception if you are talking about the intent of the gospel (the means God has chosen to draw all man). Even most Calvinists affirm the universality of the gospel's call in that it is MEANT for all to hear without exception...thus when Christ is raised up and send the gospel out his intent is for all to hear it and thus all to be drawn without exception.

    Now, if the preaching of the gospel by free creatures is the only means God has chosen to use to draw the world to himself (which it may or may not be), then Christ would be expressing his desire for all people to be invited, though disobedience in a sinful and fallen world might prevent that from happening.

    Like the illustration of the banquet where the master send servants into the highways and byways to invite anyone who would come, God send us, his servants into all the world to invite whosoever will come..."all without exception." This passage along with verses such as these prove that God does desire for all to hear (be drawn), repent and believe:

    9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.

    and

    3 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4 who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.

    and

    14 How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them?

    Now, for those who never hear the gospel, I think there can be a very strong argument made that they will be held accountable to the level of their revelation...but start another thread if you want to discuss that because that is a big rabbit that I'd rather not chase here.
     
  6. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not to worry...no interruption.

    I think "blind" is not the best word here for this discussion. But, as far as hardening goes, I think it is clear that God gives sinners what they want--sometimes. He turns them over to their sinful desires--He removes His common grace--and allows them to be worse.

    How He does this? I don't know. That He does it is evident throughout scripture.

    As for the justice of this--Again, it's not as if God was doing this hardening to Mother Theresa. The hardened whom God hardens further want to have hard hearts.

    So, perhaps, a young Hitler was not quite the monster the Hitler of the holocaust was. But, because of God's further hardening of an already hardened heart, Hitler became the monster we all know he was. (Not intending to get into a Jewish debate here...I could have used Stalin instead).

    Why do I think this? It is clear that, in Romans, Paul talks about God raising up Pharaoh for a specific purpose. It would seem that the Pharaoh of the Exodus existed to be a pinata for God. Before my Calvinist days, I used to argue that Pharaoh hardened his own heart before God hardened it. But, I was wrong about that then. God tells Moses that He (God) will harden Pharaoh's heart. Now, we know that Pharaoh was not the poster-child for righteousness, but God still hardens his heart to make an example out of him.

    In the episode of the Exodus, you have an already unbelieving person (Pharaoh) being hardened by God to increase the judgment (the plagues) so that God's own glory is magnified and proclaimed throughout the world. And in all of that, according to Paul, God is absolutely justified in doing what He did. Pharaoh was created for dishonorable purposes; Moses was created for honorable purposes.

    Blessings to you! (It's 3:20 AM where I'm at...I'm going to bed!). When you get the chance, sleep well, my friend.

    The Archangel
     
  7. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    OK...one more post before bed.

    It can mean all without exception, but it doesn't have to. I agree with a universal call. However, even the "all" in your phrase "...his intent is for all to hear" cannot be all without exception. The American Indian living in North America in 800 AD would not have heard. He or she would have never known the name Jesus or the title Christ or even the existence of a place called Jerusalem.

    I agree that we should invite all we can. We should work arduously to invite all.

    Let me note something here: "if the preaching of the gospel by free creatures is the only means God has chosen to use to draw the world to himself (which it may or may not be)" Are you kidding me? The heresy alarm is going off. Please clarify.

    You have several contextual issues here.

    2 Peter 3:9--Peter is addressing the beloved (presumably Christians) and God is said to be patient towards them...not willing that any should perish...

    Since he is addressing believers, Peter is rightly exhorting his listeners to be constantly and consistently examining their lives and their faith to make sure they are, in fact, saved.

    This is not a general statement. The "all" is qualified by the "you [plural]" that Peter is addressing as he encourages them.

    1 Timothy 2:4--In the context, Paul has exhorted his listeners to pray for kings, etc. This is astounding considering the fact that many Christians had already faced persecution and death at the hands of many rulers, not the least of which was the Roman Emperor (Nero, likely at this time).

    Paul says to pray for the king is good in the sight of God who desires all to be saved. The all obviously is a reference back to the kings/rulers Paul has just exhorted the people to pray for.

    So, in essence, Paul is exhorting the people to pray for the salvation of Nero, among the other oppressive kings/rulers.

    Again, the "all" is qualified and does not mean "all without exception."

    Romans 10:14--I'm not sure what you are getting at here. Paul is exhorting the Romans Christians to do missions. Don't be stupid hyper-Calvinists! Get out there and do the work that God has commanded you to do--make disciples.

    Since the elect are unknown to everyone but God, it makes sense to go to everyone calling them to repentance and faith.

    Agreed. Not a rabbit to chase here. I do think there will be varied judgments and punishments against those who have had more opportunity/less opportunity. For example the American Indian who lived in North America in 800 AD will be judged far less severely than someone who lives today. Again, a subject for another time.

    Blessings,

    The Archangel
     
    #47 The Archangel, Jan 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 22, 2010
  8. Allan

    Allan Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,902
    Likes Received:
    5
    See, I follow you here
    What I don't understand is where you have God having to harden that which by nature can not be spiritually hardened any more than it already is - from birth. If it can not see or hear (spiritually) and has no ability whatsoever to even choose to believe God that He can change them, then I am at a loss for any need or choise to 'harden' even more. For me, it makes no sense. To me it is like God placing duct tape over a blind mans eyes so he can't see. It serves no purpose.

    Ah... I thought you had some insider information and that I would have some good preaching material this Sunday :laugh:

    Well.. I think God did (with respect to Mother T. - but that is just me)
    Just because a person does murder in mass doesn't necessitate a hardened heart. We can find the same hardness in the religiously minded.

    Granted, but then again the question comes, Is God doing the hardening their hearts so He can pour upon them greater spiritual judgment for His work in their life? Maybe am just not understanding your concept here - actaully I am pretty sure it is me.

    Not sure if you addressed this point but could you provide me with some scripture to support this contension of hardening to magnify their judgment?

    If I may on this..
    Yes, God did tell Moses He would harden Pharoahs heart, but that does not mean God was the reason Pharoah first hardened his heart. I say this becuase scripture does state specifically 'when' God began hardening and that was 'after' pharoah initial hardening. I believe to assume God's statement meant that He was going to be the intial hardener of Pharoah's heart we would see scripture detail that God did this, as it does in the other instances. It 'almost' sounds like God is become the author of Pharoah's disobedience.


    So are you contending the 'judgment' of which you speak is physical and not spiritual? -- maybe I'm just to tired to be one here :laugh:

    I have no issue or problem with that IF Pharoah was the intial hardener of heart. The only time in scripture we see God giving men over to their sins is after they chosen sin over righteousness. In fact we see God sending forth a strong delusion (hardening) to those who have rejected truth so that they are sealed in the condemnation (2 Thes 2:10-12)

    I wont get to go to bed until noon today. After work (6am) I go home and wake up the wife and kids for home schooling, say good morning and take shower. Head BACK up here to work at 8am for a meeting till 9am and then from 9 till noon a First aid/CPR class for those in security. So I will be near passing out come then :laugh:


    ANWAY - Some of my post is off topic and not necessary something needing to be address. You guys have a pretty good thing going and I would hate to derail. I'll someone else come and do that :)
     
    #48 Allan, Jan 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 22, 2010
  9. Allan

    Allan Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,902
    Likes Received:
    5
    I agree with you here as this is what the context dictates.

    On this one, I take exception.
    The kings and rulers are not the qualifiers for whom the 'all men' phrase is speaking to brother. The Kings and rulers that Paul speaks to is for the purpose of 'including' them into phrase, not to exclude all others. I believe Paul directly addressed their inclusion for the very reasons which you stated. These horrific men and advisaries of the gospel were not whom one would typically think to include in our supplications and intercessions. Vs 3 qualifies his command for their inclusion into the sain't prayers and vss 4-5 expound on this reasoning for their inclusion.

    As we see vs 4 conitues on with what the original intent of verse 1 was speaking to. We know this because vs 6 speaks 'back to' the 'all men', yet if we are to hold to your view then Christ was only a ransom for the kings and rulers. However we know this is not the case. Pual is maintaining his thought all the way through regarding whom the 'all men' are, and this meant all inclusively - even toward the very enemies of the church and God.
     
    #49 Allan, Jan 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 22, 2010
  10. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I can live with that...

    Well, its usually the Calvinist that insist there is another means at work...the "effectual call," by which God "draws" all "his elect" effectually. (still have heresy alarms going off?) I was just acknowledging that God may choose to use other means to bring people into faith with him where the gospel is never preached. Miracles, supernatural interventions, dreams, or even finding scripture etc. Obviously God used all these means in scripture so I don't rule them out has possibilities. The point is that God desires for all to be invited...just like he desires you to resist temptation everytime. It doesn't mean it will necessarily happen just because it's God's desire, nor does it mean God has failed. It simply means God intends/desires for all to hear and repent.

    Why would he express patience with them if he is the one doing everything in their salvation? What is he waiting on? Himself?

    Wow, and you think I have trouble with Acts 13... I can't imagine anyone objectively reading these texts and walking away thinking anything other than God wanting every person to be saved, but when you have to make a passage fit into your system I guess you do what you have to do.

    I'm simply affirming what we both agree upon already...that God has sent the message to ALL without exception. I'm just not sure why you would believe that God would want all without exception to hear the gospel, but not desire all with out exception to believe the gospel. Explain that seeming contradiction.
     
  11. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wanted to comment on this one reply to Allan. I think the scripture does give us some insight on how he hardened them. It think he uses supernatural means and "normal" human means:

    1. He spoke in parables so some could not understand (human means)
    2. He sent them a "spirit of stupor"
    3. In Pharaoh's case there were other magicians duplicating the plagues with "tricks"
    4. He "blinded" them spiritually
    5. He provoked them with hard teachings...(i.e. eat my flesh and drink my blood)


    I point these out because God is actively hardening Israel in their rebellious condition. Paul, who was also a hardened Pharisee, was confronted in such a powerful way that it convinced him to change direction. If the so called "effectual call" (regeneration) is being employed by God why was it necessary for God to blind Paul in this way? Wasn't the point of the supernatural intervention to change Paul's will? Couldn't a simple act of regeneration have accomplished the same thing?

    BTW, I know you are answering a lot of posts but please don't miss #43. I'm interested to hear your responses: http://baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1506688&postcount=43
     
    #51 Skandelon, Jan 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 22, 2010
  12. The Archangel

    The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    233
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No, I don't think God "needed" to blind Pharaoh. Pharaoh was already hardened because he was a sinner--like the rest of humanity.

    The Jews were hardened by nature of their being human.

    A further hardening was given so that the sin would be greater, the judgment more substantial, and God's glory would be maximized.

    Sure it says they were hardened to keep them from seeing. But it doesn't say when they were hardened. The hardness of humanity--because of the fall--is present in every human (ie. a heart that desires only evil continually and a heart that is desperately wicked).

    If election is talked about in terms of "before the foundation of the world" then reprobation must take place in the same time-frame.

    Again, a further hardening--giving them exactly what they want, according to the flesh--happened. I would argue that this is God removing His restraint against evil and allowing the hardened to pursue evil with gusto. After all, the only-evil-continually heart has to be restrained, or else all of humanity would plunge into the anarchy we see immediately before the flood.

    God may do as He pleases. If He chooses to harden further--which He does--then so be it.

    Blessings,

    The Archangel
     
  13. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    That seems to contradict what you said earlier when you agreed with me... I'll repost it here:

    If this is true, then answer these three questions:

    1. Why doesn't it describe them being in this condition from birth? Why does it speak of them BECOMING like this over time?
    2. Why does Paul contrast those who are being hardened (Israel) with those who "will listen" (Gentiles)? (Acts 28:28)
    3. Why does it describe what they "might" have done "otherwise?"

    But, what is point? In my system, there is a REASON for God hardening the Jews. To keep them in darkness so they would not believe. He used their rebellion to crucify Jesus and he allowed for a time where the Gentiles could be grafted into the vine.

    In your system, there is no purpose for the hardening because they would have done exactly what they did regardless of whether or not God hardened them or not. How does God kicking them while their down bring him more glory? How do you judge someone more than by sending them to eternal damnation? There is no good reason for hardening in your system. It is redundant at best and accomplishes NOTHING.
     
Loading...