1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Governments' authority to regulate

Discussion in 'Polls Forum' started by Alcott, Oct 25, 2006.

?
  1. Require seat belts must be worn in a moving car

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  2. Require helmets must be worn when riding a motorcycle

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. Require helmets must be worn when riding a bicycle

    1 vote(s)
    11.1%
  4. Helmets or hard hats must be worn when walking or standing on a public street

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Forbid smoking

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  6. Make foods that exceed a certain level of fat illegal

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Require citizens to do perform a certain level of meaningful exercise daily

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. Require immunizations for children regardless of parental wishes

    4 vote(s)
    44.4%
  9. Require a physical examination at least once annually for all citizens

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. Regulate the amount of calories that a food service provider may serve any one patron

    1 vote(s)
    11.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,633
    Ratings:
    +324
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Inspired by the recent poll about requiring seat belts, which of these regulatory functions of government(s) are proper to maintain health and safety of the citizenry?
     
  2. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    You need a choice for "None of the above"
     
  3. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,633
    Ratings:
    +324
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since you can view the results without voting, that should negate the need for a "None of the above" option.
     
  4. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Ratings:
    +0
    I have to agree, I can't vote for any option, as there is not a "None of the above" option.

    So, I didn't vote.
     
  5. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,707
    Ratings:
    +658
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I wish there was a "None of the Above" (like in Nevada).
    I want my vote to count. But I could not vote for any of the above.

    Salty
     
  6. I Am Blessed 24

    I Am Blessed 24 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    44,448
    Ratings:
    +0
    I agree! I couldn't vote.
     
  7. donnA

    donnA New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Ratings:
    +0
    No, not really. Because now you don't know how many people would have voted for none of the above,against goverment intrusion, you only know how many voted for goverment intrusion in our lives.
     
  8. KenH

    KenH Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Ratings:
    +0
    The federal government shouldn't be involved in any of the items listed in the poll. I find nothing in the powers given to the federal government in the U.S. constitution that involve any of those areas. What a state can do depends on each individual state's constitution.
     
  9. StefanM

    StefanM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,024
    Ratings:
    +408
    You could make a case for food service regulations for nationwide chains based on interstate commerce, but IMO it would be a weak case.
     
  10. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,707
    Ratings:
    +658
    Faith:
    Baptist
    According to the results of your poll, 100% of the people believe there should be government intrusiton in several areas of our life

    Salty
     
  11. donnA

    donnA New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Ratings:
    +0
    Exactly why there should have been a "none of the above" choice, the results are skewed.
     
  12. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    agree w/donna; without a "none of the above" option, you simply don't know how many folks have a problem with all of the listed government actions.

    It is not the job of Government to maintain the health of its citizens.
     
Loading...