1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Have MV's caused more confusion than good?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Baptist4life, Jun 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. labaptist

    labaptist Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    1
    One thing that amazes me is that the more educated you are, the more 'easy to read' you want your bible. Case in point, my brother in law graduated from Cornell, U of Mich and Princeton and uses the NIV. I dropped out of Jr high, went to HAC for half a semester and took one correspondence course and I can ready the KJV fine. Things that make you go hmmmm as Arsenio would say.
     
  2. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you "can ready the KJV fine" , can you ?

    Before the TNIV it had been an established practice to bash the NIV . The custom has still not waned . However , the TNIV has gotten more maltreatment in more recent years .

    The NIV is a fine version . It doesn't have a striking personality as far as versions go . But it has settled in as having some of the overall best qualities . Smart people already have determined that long ago ;)
     
  3. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    I still say we should eschew all Modern Versions, including the KJV, and return to reading the Greek and Hebrew.

    If one Modern Version is evil, simply because it's a modern version, then they all must be. (This, obviously excludes such things as "Judith".)
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    What happens to this thread if we define "modern" as any time after 1600 :)?
     
  5. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's too modern.

    I say nothing after 1200.
     
  6. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    I assume that according to scripture we are in the last days now. So wouldn't that qualify us to be "modern."
     
  7. mcdirector

    mcdirector Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,292
    Likes Received:
    11
    Technically, 1150 to 1450 is the Early Modern English Period, Roger, so we could go back before that.

    What's your pleasure? Old English or Anglo-Saxon? :thumbs:
     
  8. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Yeah, and the "last days" commenced with John's words, "Even so come Lord Jesus."
     
  9. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, MV's haven't caused more confusion than good.
    MV's have caused more good than confusion
    especially among those who understand that
    what is being communicated by the Bible
    is much more important than the form or format
    of the communication. The Written Word of God
    is the communication (software) of God to people,
    not the exact words (hardware) which the person
    being communicated to might understand best.

    Ain't God Good! :saint:
     
  10. Keith M

    Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Brother Ed! Preach it!

    MVs have clarified much confusion rather than creating more confusion. The confusion lies with those who refuse to accept MVs as the written word of God.
     
  11. mcdirector

    mcdirector Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,292
    Likes Received:
    11
    Seconding that Amen!
     
  12. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    And with that amen we are on page 20 and this thread is closed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...